Delhi High Court

80,117 judgments

Year:

Atul Jain v. Amber Joshi & Anr

02 Jul 2015 · Manmohan · 2015:DHC:10876

The Delhi High Court disposed of contempt petitions alleging dishonour of post-dated cheques as satisfied upon respondents submitting fresh cheques and providing binding assurances to honour all obligations under the Settlement Agreement.

civil petition_allowed contempt of court wilful disobedience post-dated cheques settlement agreement

Ishan Education Research Society v. National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions

02 Jul 2015 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2015:DHC:5195

The Delhi High Court upheld NCMEI's revocation and denial of minority status to educational institutions established by a society that failed to prove genuine establishment and administration by a notified minority community.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Minority Educational Institution National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions Act, 2004 Section 2(g) established and administered

Subhash Chand v. MCD

02 Jul 2015 · Sunita Gupta · 2015:DHC:5184

The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition and condonation of delay application filed by MCD, holding that delay was not sufficiently explained and suppression of material facts disentitled the respondent from relief, affirming reinstatement with full back wages to the petitioner under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay Section 5 Limitation Act review petition Article 226 Constitution of India

Umed Singh v. Union of India

02 Jul 2015 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Deepa Sharma · 2015:DHC:5182-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the petitioner’s removal from CISF service due to violation of natural justice in non-supply of documents and remanded the matter for fresh inquiry.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant departmental inquiry natural justice non-supply of documents mala fides

Ramesh Nagar & Ors. v. State & Ors.

02 Jul 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:5181

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 308 IPC on the basis of a matrimonial settlement between the parties, applying inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC after a prima facie assessment of the case.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR non-compoundable offence Section 308 IPC

Shashi v. State

02 Jul 2015 · Sanjiv Khanna; R.K. Gauba · 2015:DHC:5190-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld a murder conviction based on credible single eyewitness testimony despite absence of forensic evidence and minor procedural discrepancies.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant single eyewitness testimony murder conviction corroboration forensic evidence

Rajesh Khanna v. Union of India and Ors.

02 Jul 2015 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Deepa Sharma · 2015:DHC:5177-DB

The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the old Land Acquisition Act, 1894 lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is unpaid or possession not taken, and mere deposit of compensation in treasury does not constitute payment.

property petition_allowed Significant Section 24(2) RTFCTLARR Act 2013 Land Acquisition Act 1894 compensation payment physical possession

Deenu v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

02 Jul 2015 · Ashutosh Kumar · 2015:DHC:5189

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 411 IPC for possession of a snatched gold chain but modified the sentence to account for the period of custody already served.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 411 IPC possession of stolen property test identification parade gold chain snatching

Virender v. State

02 Jul 2015 · Ashutosh Kumar · 2015:DHC:5188

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 474 IPC for possession of a forged document but modified the sentence to account for custody already served.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Forgery Section 468 IPC Section 474 IPC Possession of forged document

Jhamman Lal v. Tara Chand Sharma

02 Jul 2015 · Vipin Sanghi · 2015:DHC:5176

The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal upholding that an oral gift of immovable property without a registered deed is invalid and affirmed possession in favor of the purchaser under a registered sale deed.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant oral gift immovable property registered sale deed Transfer of Property Act

Rajesh Thakur v. Union of India and Ors.

02 Jul 2015 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Deepa Sharma · 2015:DHC:5193-DB

The Delhi High Court held that promotion benefits must be granted retrospectively based on upgraded ACRs despite the absence of specific DoPT instructions, directing the respondents to hold a Review DPC accordingly.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Annual Confidential Reports ACR upgradation Departmental Promotion Committee promotion entitlement

Sudhir Bansal v. Shyama Devi & Ors.

02 Jul 2015 · J. R. Midha · 2015:DHC:5192

The Delhi High Court dismissed the employer’s appeal and upheld the Workmen’s Compensation award to the deceased’s family, affirming employer liability for a fatal accident occurring during the course of employment.

labor appeal_dismissed Workmen’s Compensation Act employer-employee relationship fatal accident compensation

Vidyawati v. Punjab Khadi Mandal

02 Jul 2015 · Mukta Gupta, J. · 2015:DHC:5174

The Delhi High Court held that a co-owner substituted as sole petitioner in an eviction suit is entitled to arrears of rent accrued prior to transfer without specific assignment of such arrears.

civil appeal_allowed Significant co-ownership arrears of rent eviction petition Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958

DCM Limited v. Shri Jassa Ram

02 Jul 2015 · Mukta Gupta, J. · 2015:DHC:5173

The Delhi High Court allowed eviction petitions under Section 14(1)(l) DRC Act, holding that redevelopment mandated and approved by statutory authorities constitutes building work at their instance, justifying eviction.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(l) eviction Master Plan of Delhi

Balbir Singh and Another v. Deepak Kumar and Ors.

02 Jul 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:5183

The Delhi High Court accepted a voluntary out-of-court settlement in a civil suit before framing of issues, decreed the suit accordingly, and granted a 50% refund of court fees under Section 16-A of the Court Fees Act.

civil appeal_allowed compromise settlement court fees refund Section 16-A Court Fees Act

Amit v. The State (Govt. of NCT) Delhi

02 Jul 2015 · S.P. Garg · 2015:DHC:5185
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside the appellant's conviction for rape and criminal conspiracy due to unreliable sole testimony of the prosecutrix and lack of corroborative evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant sole testimony prosecutrix rape Section 376 IPC

Akshita Kohli v. Directorate of Education & Ors.

02 Jul 2015 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2015:DHC:5186

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking permission for the petitioner to appear in Class XII exams without passing Class XI, holding that attendance and examination records are presumed correct and such disputes require detailed factual inquiry beyond writ jurisdiction.

education petition_dismissed Significant writ petition attendance records examination appearance Class XI detention

UP Airways Ltd. v. Pritam Singh

02 Jul 2015 · Ved Prakash Vaish · 2015:DHC:5187

The High Court held that the respondent was a workman under the Industrial Disputes Act and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after allowing both parties to adduce evidence, setting aside the earlier award of reinstatement without proper enquiry.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act workman definition domestic enquiry termination of service

Ved Prakash & Ors. v. Deepak & Anr

02 Jul 2015 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2015:DHC:5178

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal setting aside the injunction order and permitted amendment of the plaint to challenge an unchallenged gift deed, directing compliance with municipal laws and encouraging mediation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant gift deed registered Will Order 39 Rule 1 CPC amendment of plaint

Sonu Kumar & Ors. v. The State of Delhi

02 Jul 2015 · Vipin Sanghi · 2015:DHC:5170

The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants under Section 498A IPC due to lack of evidence of specific harassment or cruelty beyond dowry demand and held that mere dowry demand without cruelty is insufficient for conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC dowry demand harassment cruelty