Delhi High Court
80,866 judgments
Trigen Electronics Private Limited v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside an indefinite blacklisting order by SDMC for failure to provide a show cause notice and hearing, remanding the matter for fresh consideration in compliance with natural justice.
Anil Shandilya & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal case under Sections 406, 420, 467, and 471 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, applying the inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Deepak Rohilla v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 365, 323, 506, and 34 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Sachin Mittal & Ors. v. NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes on the ground of amicable settlement between the parties before framing of charges.
GOVIND @ SURAJ v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable settlement and divorce decree, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Shah Alah & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, applying its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Vinod Kumar & Ors. v. The State, (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, affirming the High Court's power under Section 482 CrPC to do so in such cases.
DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE v. GUO ZHISHENG & ANR
The Delhi High Court upheld bail granted to foreign nationals accused of smuggling gold, emphasizing that bail may be granted with conditions despite the seriousness of the offence and ongoing investigation.
M/S SAUMYA MINING LTD. & ORS. v. M/S S.E. INVESTMENTS LTD.
The Delhi High Court held that a consent Award passed pursuant to a signed settlement agreement is binding and not challengeable under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Sudhir Kumar v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and applications for condonation of delay due to lack of documentary evidence and upheld the dismissal of the petition for non-filing of the original will and incomplete witness examination.
Gram Sudhar Samiti v. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to dispose of the petitioner’s pending land exchange application or treat the writ petition as a representation and decide the matter within ten weeks by passing a reasoned order.
Sushil Kumar Aggarwal v. Ajay Industrial Corporation Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a defence sufficiently disclosed in a Section 251 Cr.P.C. notice entitles the accused to cross-examine the complainant under Section 145(2) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, quashing the trial court’s dismissal of such application.
Ranbir @ Kala v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR under Section 363 IPC based on the prosecutrix's consent and amicable settlement with the petitioner, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Anil Yadav v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 328 IPC based on an amicable settlement between husband and wife, applying inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to secure ends of justice in a matrimonial dispute.
Rakesh Bahadur Mathur v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the official to first decide the jurisdictional issue of whether the land is agricultural before proceeding with demarcation under the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954.
Surinder Kumar Babbar v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the rape convictions of two appellants, affirmed the victim's minor status based on official records, and modified sentences to run concurrently, emphasizing the reliability of prosecutrix testimony despite minor discrepancies and delay in FIR.
SUMAN BANSI DHAR AND ORS v. UOI
The Delhi High Court held that legal heirs are entitled to execution of conveyance deed on an accepted and fully paid leasehold-to-freehold conversion application of the deceased lessee without fresh application or charges.
Vihan Tagra v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and futility of proceedings.
Satya Narayan & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC on the basis of amicable settlement and mutual divorce, affirming the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to end futile criminal proceedings.
Dinesh Kumar Sethi v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.