Delhi High Court

80,866 judgments

Year:

Sunni Kadian v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)

13 Jul 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:5469

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under the Essential Commodities Act due to procedural lapses and lack of evidence of diversion, upholding the appellate authority's order setting aside cancellation of the petitioner's Fair Price Shop license.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Essential Commodities Act, 1955 FIR quashing procedural irregularities Fair Price Shop

Virender & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT) of Delhi & Anr

13 Jul 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:5470

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 307 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement at the investigation stage, applying inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC while considering the minor nature of injury and possibility of conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 307 IPC non-compoundable offence

U.P. Rural Institute of Medical Science & Research & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.

13 Jul 2015 · Vibhu Bakhru, J · 2015:DHC:5457
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that strict adherence to prescribed cut-off dates and valid Consent of Affiliation is mandatory for approval of medical courses, dismissing the petition challenging rejection of late application.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Medical Council of India Consent of Affiliation cut-off date time schedule

Kishan Chand & Ors v. Union of India & Ors

13 Jul 2015 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2015:DHC:5489-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is not paid within five years, and the 2015 Amendment Ordinance cannot retrospectively affect vested rights.

property petition_allowed Significant Section 24(2) RTFCTLARR Act 2013 Land Acquisition Act 1894 compensation payment acquisition proceedings lapse

Rajeev Chawla v. State

13 Jul 2015 · Indermeet Kaur · 2015:DHC:5465

The Delhi High Court held that a screw driver is not a deadly weapon under Section 397 IPC, converted the conviction to Section 392 IPC, and ordered the appellant's release considering time already served.

criminal sentence_modified Significant Section 397 IPC Section 392 IPC deadly weapon robbery

Harish Khurana v. Ministry of Corporate Affairs & Anr.

13 Jul 2015 · Chief Justice; J. Jayant Nath · 2015:DHC:5463-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition as infructuous after a statutory amendment mandated appointment of company secretaries, removing the petition's cause of action.

corporate petition_dismissed Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Rules, 2014 Rule 8A company secretary writ petition

Dharmabir Yadav v. Union of India & Ors.

13 Jul 2015 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Deepa Sharma · 2015:DHC:5471-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that personnel not sent for pre-promotional courses due to administrative reasons are entitled to the second financial upgradation under the ACP Scheme after 24 years of service.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Assured Career Progression Scheme ACP Scheme second financial upgradation pre-promotional course

Mir Singh & Ors. v. Govt of NCT & Ors.

13 Jul 2015 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2015:DHC:5474

The Delhi High Court set aside the rejection of alternate plot allotment due to discrepancies in land identification, directing the authorities to re-examine the case with a personal hearing and pass a reasoned order.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 4(1) Khasra number discrepancy alternate plot allotment

Hero Reality Limited v. Brajesh Nagar & Anr.

13 Jul 2015 · Manmohan Singh · 2015:DHC:5501

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and punitive damages to Hero Realty Limited against defendants for infringing its registered trademark 'HARIDWAR GREENS' by using the deceptively similar mark 'HARIDWAR GREEN CITY'.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off permanent injunction punitive damages

Vinod Kumar Singh & Ors v. Devraj Singh & Ors

13 Jul 2015 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:5458-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld rejection of a partition suit on the ground of res judicata, affirming that prior final decisions between the same parties bar subsequent suits absent substantial pleaded facts to reopen partition.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant res judicata partition suit Order VII Rule 11 CPC Hindu undivided family

HDFC Bank Ltd & Anr v. Sanjiv Kumar Gupta

13 Jul 2015 · Pratibha Rani · 2015:DHC:10821

The Delhi High Court set aside the Trial Court's order closing plaintiff's evidence due to absence of defendant's counsel and granted one opportunity to cross-examine the witness subject to costs.

civil appeal_allowed cross-examination discharge of witness closure of evidence fair trial

Urmilla Seth v. Jaideep Seth & Ors.

10 Jul 2015 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2015:DHC:11934-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed appeals by consent to set aside directions requiring deposit of rents with the court registry and suspension of maintenance payments, without affecting other parts of the interim order.

civil appeal_allowed interlocutory order deposit of rents maintenance payments Order 23 Rule 3 CPC

The New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Kusum Lata Devi and Ors

10 Jul 2015 · J. R. Midha · 2015:DHC:11915

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal against a compensation order under the Workmen's Compensation Act, affirming liability to pay compensation with interest where the deceased was employed by the vehicle owner at the time of the accident.

labor appeal_dismissed Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 compensation employee vehicle owner liability

M/S L&T Finance Ltd. v. Depinder Singh Bedi

10 Jul 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:11229

The High Court upheld the discharge of a director accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that mere directorship without signing the cheque or specific allegations is insufficient for prosecution.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 141 Negotiable Instruments Act summoning order director liability

Ram Narayan Singh v. New Delhi Municipal Council

10 Jul 2015 · Rajtv Sahai Endlaw · 2015:DHC:11182

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions by street vendors challenging municipal dispossession due to lack of proper pleadings and parties, imposing costs and emphasizing procedural compliance under the Street Vendors Act.

administrative appeal_dismissed Street Vendors Act 2014 Town Vending Committee pleadings exemplary costs

Shinil Kumar v. Union of India & Anr.

10 Jul 2015 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Deepa Sharma · 2015:DHC:11179-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court held that CISF employees granted outdoor residence permission without official accommodation are entitled to HRA benefits, adjusting any compensation paid under Rule 61(3).

service_law petition_allowed Significant House Rent Allowance CISF Rules outdoor residence permission Rule 61(3)

Gurminder Jit Singh Modi & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

10 Jul 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:5440

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal proceeding under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, affirming the High Court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to do so in such cases.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial disputes Section 498-A IPC

Suraj & Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

10 Jul 2015 · Suresh Kait, J. · 2015:DHC:5441
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 308 IPC on the basis of amicable settlement between parties and exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC, emphasizing cautious application in serious offences.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR non-compoundable offences Section 308 IPC

Pran Kumar Kaul v. Indian Overseas Bank & Ors.

10 Jul 2015 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:5427-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the removal of a bank officer for unauthorized withdrawals and transfers, holding that procedural compliance was met and such misconduct justifies dismissal.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant disciplinary proceedings bank officer misconduct Indian Overseas Bank Regulations misappropriation

Sandeep Bhatnagar v. State, Govt of NCT Delhi

10 Jul 2015 · Ashutosh Kumar · 2015:DHC:5426

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's discretion in partially allowing the petitioner's application to summon defence witnesses and refusing others, emphasizing that the accused's right to summon witnesses and documents is subject to judicial scrutiny to prevent abuse.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 91 Cr.P.C. Section 233 Cr.P.C. defence witnesses summoning documents