Delhi High Court

81,561 judgments

Year:

Ajit Singh v. Additional Commissioner of Customs

24 Jul 2015 · P. S. Teji · 2015:DHC:5908
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed revision petitions acquitting accused due to inadmissibility of retracted confessions, non-examination of independent witnesses, and failure to produce recovered gold as evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Confessional statement Section 108 Customs Act Section 135(1)(a) Customs Act Retracted confession

State of NCT of Delhi v. Salim @ Guddu

24 Jul 2015 · Ashutosh Kumar · 2015:DHC:5896
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court held that the trial court erred in discharging the accused at the charge framing stage where sufficient prima facie material existed, and remanded the case for framing charges and trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 227 CrPC charge framing conspiracy extra-judicial confession

CIT v. M/S Bharat Hotels Ltd.

24 Jul 2015 · S. Muralidhar; Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:5891-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the assessee's entitlement to claim depreciation on buildings constructed under a licence and held that refundable deposits from sub-licensees are not taxable income.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant depreciation Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 32 license agreement

M/S. TODAY HOMES AND INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. v. SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

24 Jul 2015 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:5885-DB

The Delhi High Court held that civil suits challenging property tax assessments under the DMC Act, 1957 are maintainable in the absence of an express statutory bar and where the statutory remedy is onerous or inadequate.

civil appeal_allowed Significant property tax assessment Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 civil suit maintainability express bar

M/S. TODAY HOMES AND INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. v. SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

24 Jul 2015 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:5886-DB

The Delhi High Court held that civil suits challenging property tax assessments under the DMC Act, 1957 are maintainable in the absence of an express statutory bar, especially where the statutory remedy is onerous, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant property tax Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 civil suit maintainability statutory remedy

Lokesh v. State, NCT of Delhi & Anr.

24 Jul 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:5897

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354/354B IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between close relatives, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC in a non-compoundable offence arising from a family dispute.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR non-compoundable offences family dispute

Delhi Transport Corporation v. Kanwar Singh

24 Jul 2015 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:5884-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that employees who opted for voluntary retirement under the 1993 scheme and accepted provident fund benefits are not entitled to pension under the 1992 pension scheme, affirming the binding Full Bench precedent and dismissing the pension claim after long delay.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Transport Corporation Voluntary Retirement Scheme Pension Scheme Contributory Provident Fund

Sahana Pal v. UK Samanta

24 Jul 2015 · Vipin Sanghi · 2015:DHC:5899

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and granted divorce on grounds of cruelty, holding that the trial court erred in relying on the respondent's unsubstantiated written statement after striking off his defense.

family appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 cruelty divorce written statement

Rehmat Khan v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

24 Jul 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:5906

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 406 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between parties, applying the inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process of law.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 406 IPC

Roshan Chauhan & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

24 Jul 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:5905

The Delhi High Court quashed two cross FIRs involving serious offences under IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, applying the principles governing the exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC compromise in criminal cases Section 308 IPC

Roshan Chauhan & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

24 Jul 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:5904

The Delhi High Court quashed two cross FIRs involving serious offences under IPC based on an amicable settlement between neighbors, applying the principles governing the exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR settlement between parties cross FIRs

Satender Prasad Singh & Anr. v. State & Anr.

24 Jul 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:5903

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 287, 288, 338, 201, and 34 IPC on the basis of compensation and settlement, applying the principles governing quashing of criminal proceedings under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC compromise in criminal cases compensation

Chander Pal v. State & Anr.

24 Jul 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:5902

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279, 337, and 304A IPC on the basis of compensation and absence of negligence, affirming the power of the court under Section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings in appropriate cases.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC compromise in criminal cases negligence

Govind & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

24 Jul 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:5901

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 308, 452, and 34 IPC based on an amicable compromise between the parties, applying the principles governing quashing of criminal proceedings under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR compromise deed Section 308 IPC

Amit Mehta & Ors. v. State & Anr.

24 Jul 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:5907

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498-A IPC

Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/S Bharat Hotels Ltd.

24 Jul 2015 · S. Muralidhar; Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:5889-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the assessee’s entitlement to depreciation on licensed hotel properties and ruled that refundable deposits from sub-licensees are not taxable income under the Income Tax Act.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant depreciation Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 32 license agreement

Deepak Gupta v. Dhanesh Kumar Akaria

24 Jul 2015 · Pratibha Rani · 2015:DHC:5890

The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of tenant's leave to defend in an eviction petition where the landlord's bona fide requirement for aged mother was established and tenant failed to raise triable issues.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act Section 14(1)(e) eviction petition bona fide requirement

Raju & Ors. v. State Through NCT Delhi & Ors.

24 Jul 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:5893

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal proceeding under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes upon amicable settlement between the parties, affirming the High Court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial disputes Section 498A IPC

Rohit & Ors. v. The Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

24 Jul 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:5894

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 323/328/341/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties at the early investigation stage, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR non-compoundable offences settlement between parties

Bijender Kumar & Ors. v. State, NCT of Delhi & Anr.

24 Jul 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:5895

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC in a matrimonial dispute upon amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC