Delhi High Court

81,561 judgments

Year:

Manish Budakoti & Ors v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr

27 Jul 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:5923

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a mediated settlement, affirming the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to end criminal proceedings in such settled cases.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute mediated settlement

Sukhbir Yadav v. State

27 Jul 2015 · S.P. Garg · 2015:DHC:5946
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of rape charges due to inconsistencies in the prosecutrix's testimony, unexplained delay in FIR, and lack of corroborative evidence, holding that conviction on sole uncorroborated testimony must be based on credible and reliable evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant rape Section 376 IPC sole testimony delay in FIR

ROHM AND HAAS ELECTRONIC MATERIALS HOLDING UK LIMITED v. R.B. BUSINESS PROMOTIONS PVT. LTD.

27 Jul 2015 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2015:DHC:5918

The Delhi High Court held that assignment of rights under a Technology Transfer Agreement includes the arbitration clause, mandating reference to arbitration and clarifying the applicability of Part II of the Arbitration Act to international arbitrations.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 45 application Technology Transfer Agreement Assignment of rights

Shanti Devi v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

27 Jul 2015 · Vibhu Bakhru, J · 2015:DHC:5945

The Delhi High Court upheld the Municipal Corporation's policy cancelling coal depot licences, ruling that licensees hold no property rights and forged documents disentitle petitioners from relief.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Tehbazari licence Municipal Corporation of Delhi Delhi Development Authority Coal depot

Shanti Devi v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

27 Jul 2015 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:5944

The Delhi High Court upheld the MCD's policy cancelling coal depot licences, ruling that licencees have no right to occupy land post licence expiry and that reliance on forged documents disentitles relief.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Tehbazari licence Coal depot Municipal Corporation of Delhi Delhi Development Authority

Mool Chand Khairati Ram Trust v. Director of Income Tax (Exemptions)

27 Jul 2015 · S. Muralidhar; Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:5917-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a charitable trust running an integrated Ayurvedic and Allopathic hospital is entitled to exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as its activities are within its objects, and the AO cannot deny exemption or depreciation merely because of the predominance of Allopathic treatment.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 11 exemption Charitable trust Ultra vires

SAP AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT & ANR. v. M/S APPSONE CONSULTING INDIA (P) LTD. AND ANR.

27 Jul 2015 · Manmohan Singh · 2015:DHC:5916

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and punitive damages against defendants for unauthorized use and training on plaintiffs' copyrighted SAP software, affirming copyright infringement under the Copyright Act, 1957.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant copyright infringement computer software SAP ERP unauthorized training

State v. Brijesh Kumar

27 Jul 2015 · S.P. Garg · 2015:DHC:5919

The Delhi High Court upheld a three-year sentence for rape of a minor, ruling that special and adequate reasons justified imposing less than the statutory minimum seven-year sentence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 376 IPC minimum sentence rape of minor consent

Ravinder Singh & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

27 Jul 2015 · Suresh Kait, J. · 2015:DHC:5925

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC based on an amicable settlement, affirming the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to quash non-compoundable offences arising from family disputes.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial disputes Section 498-A IPC

Kuldeep Mehta and Anr. v. State & Anr.

27 Jul 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:5926

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal case under Sections 406, 420, and 120B IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC in line with Supreme Court precedents.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC non-compoundable offences settlement between parties

Bhagwan Das @ Chokanni v. State

27 Jul 2015 · Indermeet Kaur, J. · 2015:DHC:5920

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the conviction for kidnapping and rape, holding that the prosecution failed to prove the appellant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt and inadmissible disclosure statements cannot be relied upon.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant disclosure statement child witness testimony Sections 24 and 25 Indian Evidence Act Section 27 Indian Evidence Act

Vikas & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr

27 Jul 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:5921

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498-A IPC

Shri Bhagwan & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

27 Jul 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:5922

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 341, 308, 506, and 34 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between related parties, applying the principles governing quashing under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR settlement between parties Section 308 IPC

Chander Shekhar & Ors v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr

27 Jul 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:5924

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a full mediated settlement, affirming the High Court's power under Section 482 CrPC to end criminal proceedings in such cases to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute mediated settlement

Shanti Devi v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

27 Jul 2015 · Vibhu Bakhru, J · 2015:DHC:5942

The Delhi High Court upheld the Municipal Corporation's policy cancelling coal depot licences, ruling that licencees hold no property rights and cannot resist eviction, especially when relying on forged documents.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Tehbazari licence Municipal Corporation of Delhi Delhi Development Authority Coal depot

Shanti Devi v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

27 Jul 2015 · Vibhu Bakhru, J · 2015:DHC:5934

The Delhi High Court upheld the Municipal Corporation's policy cancelling coal depot licences, ruling that licencees have no right to occupy premises post-cancellation and that reliance on forged licences disentitles petitioners from relief.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Tehbazari licence Coal depot Municipal Corporation of Delhi Delhi Development Authority

Shiv Prakash Katiyar v. Jawahar Lal University & Ors.

27 Jul 2015 · C. Hari Shankar; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:8097-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that an interlocutory order issuing notice without deciding any controversy is not a "judgment" under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent, and thus the Letters Patent Appeal against such order is not maintainable.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Letters Patent Appeal judgment definition interlocutory order Clause 10 Letters Patent

Digital Radio (Mumbai) Broadcasting Ltd & Another v. Union of India

26 Jul 2015 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2015:DHC:5911-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that denial of security clearance to FM radio companies based on adverse inputs against indirect minority shareholders who are not directors or controlling shareholders is unsustainable and quashed the rejection of their auction applications.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant security clearance corporate veil piercing the corporate veil FM radio auction

Digital Radio (Mumbai) Broadcasting Ltd & Another v. Union of India

26 Jul 2015 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2015:DHC:5910-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that security clearance under the FM radio auction policy applies only to the applicant company and its directors, not to shareholders, and quashed denial of clearance based on allegations against non-controlling shareholders.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant security clearance corporate veil piercing the corporate veil FM radio auction

Ajit Singh v. Additional Commissioner of Customs

24 Jul 2015 · P. S. Teji · 2015:DHC:5909
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court acquitted petitioners convicted under the Customs Act due to inadmissibility of retracted confessions, non-examination of independent witnesses, and failure to produce recovered gold, highlighting strict evidentiary requirements in smuggling cases.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Customs Act 1962 Section 108 Customs Act Confessional statement Retracted confession