Delhi High Court

81,561 judgments

Year:

V.K. Jain v. C.B.I.

24 Jul 2015 · Ashutosh Kumar · 2015:DHC:5898

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction for possession of counterfeit currency under Section 489C IPC but reduced the sentence from two years to six months considering the long trial delay and appellant's circumstances.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 489C IPC counterfeit currency possession knowledge

Krishna v. State

24 Jul 2015 · Indermeet Kaur, J. · 2015:DHC:5900

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for rape of a three-year-old child, rejecting the defence of false implication and alibi based on consistent victim testimony and corroborative medical evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant sexual offence rape of minor child victim testimony false implication

CIT v. M/S Bharat Hotels Ltd.

24 Jul 2015 · S. Muralidhar; Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:5892-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the assessee's entitlement to claim depreciation on licensed hotel properties despite legal ownership vesting in NDMC and held that refundable deposits from sub-licensees are not taxable income.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant depreciation Income Tax Act, 1961 license agreement sub-licensee deposits

Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/S Bharat Hotels Ltd.

24 Jul 2015 · S. Muralidhar; Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:5887-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the assessee's entitlement to claim depreciation on buildings constructed on licensed land despite NDMC's ownership, and held that refundable deposits from sub-licensees are not taxable receipts separate from business income.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant depreciation Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 32 licensee

Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/S Bharat Hotels Ltd.

24 Jul 2015 · S. Muralidhar; Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:5888-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the assessee's entitlement to claim depreciation on licensed hotel properties despite legal title vesting in NDMC and ruled that refundable deposits from sub-licensees are not taxable income.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant depreciation Income Tax Act, 1961 license agreement sub-licensee deposits

Ayushi v. Delhi Technological University & Ors.

23 Jul 2015 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2015:DHC:5869

The Delhi High Court held that Delhi Technological University could restrict defence quota reservation to specified gallantry awards excluding police medals, dismissing the petitioner’s claim based on police gallantry awards.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant defence quota reservation gallantry awards police personnel Delhi Technological University

Lakhbir Singh v. Arun Khanna

23 Jul 2015 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:5865-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that a subsequent suit for specific performance is barred under Order II Rule 2 CPC if it arises from the same cause of action as an earlier suit for injunction filed without leave of the court.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order II Rule 2 CPC cause of action specific performance permanent injunction

Rakesh Mayor & Another v. M/S Vigneshwara Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Others

23 Jul 2015 · Manmohan Singh · 2015:DHC:5872

The Delhi High Court held that the defendants must pay the plaintiffs the Buy-Back amount with interest as per the agreement, rejecting illegal additional charges raised after exercising the Buy-Back option.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Buy-Back Agreement Developer-Anchor Unit Agreement Order XXXVII CPC Recovery of money

Sanjay v. State

23 Jul 2015 · Sanjiv Khanna; R. K. Gauba · 2015:DHC:5873-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC where the appellant intentionally inflicted fatal head injuries on his mother, rejecting the plea for reduction to culpable homicide.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant murder Section 302 IPC culpable homicide Section 304 IPC

Jamna Datwani v. Kishin Datwani & Ors.

23 Jul 2015 · V.K. Shali · 2015:DHC:5867

The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition seeking contempt proceedings against respondent Kishin Datwani, holding that contempt is discretionary and alternative remedies under Order 39 CPC are available.

civil petition_dismissed Significant contempt proceedings wilful disobedience review petition Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC

Ajay @ Rajesh v. State

23 Jul 2015 · Ashutosh Kumar · 2015:DHC:5866

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction for armed robbery but reduced the sentence to the period already served, balancing punitive and reformative sentencing principles.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant robbery identification non-recovery of weapon sentencing

Amjad Ali v. Salma Begum and Anr.

23 Jul 2015 · S.P. Garg · 2015:DHC:5879

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition and upheld the Trial Court's order directing the petitioner to pay reasonable monthly maintenance to his divorced wife and child under Section 125 Cr.P.C., finding no evidence of reduced income or illegality.

family appeal_dismissed maintenance Section 125 Cr.P.C. concealment of income dowry cruelty

Ajay @ Rajesh v. State; Devi Prakash Yadav v. State

23 Jul 2015 · Ashutosh Kumar · 2015:DHC:5871

The Delhi High Court upheld the robbery convictions of appellants but reduced their substantive sentences considering their conduct and absence of criminal antecedents.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant robbery identification non-recovery of weapon sentencing

Kamal Kishor v. Addl. DCP-I North West Distt Delhi & Ors.

23 Jul 2015 · Ashutosh Kumar · 2015:DHC:5868

The Delhi High Court upheld the externment of a habitual offender under the Delhi Police Act, emphasizing that preventive externment orders do not require conviction in all cases and must be based on material showing danger to society and witness intimidation.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant externment habitual offender Delhi Police Act 1978 Section 47

Vimal Sharma & Anr. v. The Standing Counsel (Crl.) & Anr.

23 Jul 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:5878

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage, affirming the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to do so in such cases.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial disputes non-compoundable offences

Rambir & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

23 Jul 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:5877

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 308/323/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement, affirming the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to quash non-compoundable offences when continuation of proceedings would be unjust.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR non-compoundable offences Section 308 IPC

Sunder & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

23 Jul 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:5876

The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal case under Section 308 IPC based on an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR non-compoundable offences Section 308 IPC

Tara Chand & Anr. v. State & Anr.

23 Jul 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:5875

The Delhi High Court quashed a long-pending criminal case under Sections 420/471/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC in line with Supreme Court precedents.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR non-compoundable offences settlement

Avdesh Kumar v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

23 Jul 2015 · S.P. Garg · 2015:DHC:5881

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of kidnapping and rape charges after holding that the victim was above 16 years and the sexual act was consensual, setting aside the conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant kidnapping rape consent ossification test

Karimuddin & Ors. v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr

23 Jul 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:5882

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under the Indian Electricity Act and IPC based on a mediated settlement, reaffirming the court's power under Section 482 CrPC to end criminal proceedings where disputes are amicably resolved and continuation would be futile.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR mediated settlement non-compoundable offences