Delhi High Court

81,561 judgments

Year:

Mhaya Buildcon Private Limited v. DLF Home Developers Limited

27 Jul 2015 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2015:DHC:5940

The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with certain shareholder and creditor meetings and directing convening of creditor meetings for approval of a Scheme of Arrangement involving amalgamation and demerger among DLF group companies.

corporate appeal_allowed Scheme of Arrangement Section 391 Companies Act, 1956 Amalgamation Demerger

Competent Hotels Private Limited v. Mahindra Holidays & Resorts Private Limited

27 Jul 2015 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2015:DHC:5939

The Delhi High Court allowed the application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for sanctioning a Scheme of Amalgamation where all parties consented in writing and no objections or pending proceedings existed.

corporate appeal_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act 1956 dispensing meetings shareholders consent

Indiabulls Finance Company Private Limited v. Indiabulls Commercial Credit Limited

27 Jul 2015 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2015:DHC:5938

The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with certain shareholder meetings and directing convening creditor meetings for approval of a Scheme of Arrangement between two companies.

corporate appeal_allowed Scheme of Arrangement Companies Act 1956 Section 391 shareholders consent

AHIPL Management Consulting Private Limited v. Fabindia Overseas Private Limited

27 Jul 2015 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2015:DHC:5937

The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application to dispense with shareholders' meetings and directed convening a meeting of unsecured creditors for approval of a Scheme of Amalgamation under the Companies Act, 1956.

corporate appeal_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act 1956 dispensing with meetings equity shareholders

Ganraj Sugars Private Limited & Ors. v. Ojas Industries Private Limited

27 Jul 2015 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2015:DHC:5936

The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for approving a Scheme of Amalgamation where all stakeholders had given written consent.

corporate appeal_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act 1956 Sections 391 and 394 dispensing meetings

Avanti Bristlers Private Limited; Grassmore Products Private Limited v. W.H. Targett India Limited

27 Jul 2015 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2015:DHC:5935

The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application under Section 391(1) of the Companies Act, 1956 to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for sanctioning a Scheme of Amalgamation where all parties consented in writing.

corporate appeal_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Section 391(1) Companies Act, 1956 dispensing with meetings shareholders consent

Rajesh Kumar Gandhi v. Shriram Institute for Industrial Research

27 Jul 2015 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:5912-DB

The Delhi High Court held that non-supply of the Inquiry Officer's report does not invalidate dismissal unless prejudice is shown, Section 25F does not apply to disciplinary dismissal, and upheld the penalty for misconduct while remanding to assess prejudice.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Inquiry Officer report non-supply Section 25F Industrial Disputes Act retrenchment

Nandan v. State

27 Jul 2015 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2015:DHC:5915-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for kidnapping and rape of a minor but modified the life sentence to 14 years rigorous imprisonment considering mitigating factors and principles of just punishment.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant rape of minor Section 376(2)(f) IPC sentence modification life imprisonment

Shanti Devi v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

27 Jul 2015 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:5913

The Delhi High Court upheld the MCD's policy cancelling coal depot licences, ruling that licencees have no right to occupy land post licence expiry and that forged documents disentitle petitioners from relief.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Tehbazari licence Municipal Corporation of Delhi Delhi Development Authority coal depots

Shri Brahma v. UOI & Anr.

27 Jul 2015 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Vipin Sanghi · 2015:DHC:10545

Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for land acquired in village Ghevra to reflect fair market value as of notification date, correcting clerical errors and ensuring statutory benefits under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 4 notification compensation enhancement fair market value

T M Sampath v. State & Anr

27 Jul 2015 · S. P. Garg · 2015:DHC:11238

The Delhi High Court acquitted the petitioner and disposed of revision petitions under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act as compounded following an amicable settlement between the parties.

criminal appeal_allowed Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act compounding of offence amicable settlement revision petition

Felix Software Solutions Private Limited v. Empower Research Knowledge Services Private Limited

27 Jul 2015 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2015:DHC:5941

The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with meetings of shareholders and creditors for a Scheme of Amalgamation except for unsecured creditors of one transferor company, directing a meeting with prescribed procedural safeguards.

corporate appeal_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act, 1956 Sections 391 to 394 dispensation of meetings

MAS Project Engineers Pvt Ltd v. Sushil Kumar Agrawal & Anr

27 Jul 2015 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:12016-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant unconditional leave to defend a suit under Order XXXVII CPC upon finding prima facie evidence of RTGS payment against the dishonoured cheque, setting aside the dismissal of leave to defend.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXXVII CPC leave to defend dishonoured cheque RTGS payment

Shanti Devi v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

27 Jul 2015 · Vibhu Bakhru, J · 2015:DHC:5927

The Delhi High Court upheld the MCD's bona fide policy cancelling coal depot licences, holding that licencees have no proprietary rights and must vacate premises, dismissing petitions challenging the policy and eviction.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Tehbazari licence Municipal Corporation of Delhi Delhi Development Authority coal depot

Shanti Devi v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

27 Jul 2015 · Vibhu Bakhru, J · 2015:DHC:5928

The Delhi High Court upheld the MCD's policy cancelling coal depot licenses, ruling that licensees have no proprietary rights and MCD has jurisdiction to retrieve sites despite ownership disputes with DDA.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Tehbazari license Municipal Corporation of Delhi Delhi Development Authority coal depot

Shanti Devi v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

27 Jul 2015 · Vibhu Bakhru, J · 2015:DHC:5929

The Delhi High Court upheld MCD's policy cancelling coal depot licenses, ruling licensees have no property rights post-cancellation and dismissing petitions based on forged documents and jurisdictional challenges.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Tehbazari license coal depot Municipal Corporation of Delhi Delhi Development Authority

G.R. Sharma v. Union of India & Ors.

27 Jul 2015 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; V.K. SHALI · 2015:DHC:5948-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking ACP benefits, holding that completion of qualifying service alone does not entitle an employee to ACP without fulfilling other eligibility criteria including clean disciplinary record and requisite annual confidential report gradings.

service_law petition_dismissed Assured Career Progression ACP benefits Central Industrial Security Force disciplinary penalties

Alok Yadava v. Govt. of (NCT) of Delhi & Ors.

27 Jul 2015 · Kailash Gambhir; P. S. Teji · 2015:DHC:5949-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a Habeas Corpus petition filed by a husband alleging illegal detention of his wife and son, holding that no prima facie case of illegal detention was made out and that the petition was an abuse of the Court's process.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Habeas Corpus illegal detention Section 498-A IPC matrimonial dispute

Shanti Devi v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

27 Jul 2015 · Vibhu Bakhru, J · 2015:DHC:5943

The Delhi High Court upheld the MCD's policy cancelling coal depot licences, ruling that licencees have no proprietary rights and dismissing petitions based on forged documents and jurisdictional challenges.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Tehbazari licence Municipal Corporation of Delhi Delhi Development Authority coal depot

Gurcharan Singh Walia v. Shashi Sareen

27 Jul 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:5947

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that disputed factual issues must be decided at trial and not at the pre-trial quashing stage.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act quashing of complaint statutory notice Section 482 CrPC