Delhi High Court
81,561 judgments
Jai Prakash v. School Management of ITL Public School & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that termination of a probationer without confirmation after the probation period is lawful absent specific rules for deemed confirmation, dismissing the appeal for reinstatement and full back wages.
Subhash Gupta v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act are deemed lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession and compensation remain pending for over five years, regardless of court stay orders, and that the 2015 Ordinance proviso does not affect vested rights.
Sudershan Kumar Kohli v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if no possession or compensation occurs within five years of the award.
Mani Kamat @ Dinesh v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of murder due to insufficient and unreliable circumstantial evidence, emphasizing the necessity of a complete and unbroken chain of proof for conviction.
Neena Wadhwa v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession is not taken and compensation not tendered, and that the 2015 Ordinance proviso excluding certain periods applies only prospectively and when possession has been taken.
Sanshar Singh and Ors v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession and compensation have not been effected within five years of the award.
M/S Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. v. Raghuvinder Singh Bhatia
The Delhi High Court upheld the DRAT's finding that the bank's overdue charges were excessive and directed the borrower to pay an additional sum to settle the dispute, dismissing the bank's writ petition.
Narinder Singh Arora v. Essence Bar & Restaurant & Others
The Delhi High Court decreed recovery of outstanding rent, damages, interest, and costs against lessees who defaulted on lease terms and unauthorizedly occupied commercial premises.
Dilip Nigam v. Sanjay Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's appeal against ejectment after lease expiry, affirming that a tenant cannot continue possession post-lease term and upholding the ejectment decree passed on admissions.
Gopi Chand Sharma v. Delhi Nagrik Sehkari Bank Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that expulsion of a cooperative society member without statutory hearing and Registrar's approval is illegal and quashed the expulsion and related tribunal order.
Harkishan and Ors. v. GNCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is not paid within five years, and that the 2015 Ordinance's proviso cannot retrospectively affect vested rights.
M/S NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA v. HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION CO LTD
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that delay in re-filing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act cannot be condoned on false or unsatisfactory grounds, emphasizing the need for diligence and adherence to statutory timelines.
Ram Chander and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse if compensation is not paid within five years under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, and that the 2015 Amendment Ordinance cannot retrospectively deprive landowners of their vested rights.
Pawan Kumar v. Lt. Governer NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, where possession and compensation were not completed within five years before the 2013 Act, are deemed to have lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.
Virender Singh v. M/S Lancer Convent Senior Secondary School
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of a school bus driver terminated for traffic violations, upholding compensation in lieu of reinstatement due to procedural irregularities in termination.
Prabhjyot Kaur v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a mediated settlement, applying the principles governing quashing under Section 482 CrPC.
Sandeep Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging CAT's order rejecting disclosure of answer sheets in an unfair means case but directed preservation of answer sheets and disclosure of marks and reasons for rejection.
Dinesh Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging CAT's order on rejection of candidature due to unfair means, directing disclosure of marks and reasons while preserving answer sheets for future remedies.
Gagan Khosla v. Canara Bank
The Delhi High Court allowed petitioners a limited opportunity to seek a one-time settlement with Canara Bank in recovery proceedings, emphasizing that such opportunity cannot be used to delay the case indefinitely.
Ajeet Singh & Ors. v. State of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 324/34 IPC based on a genuine compromise between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.