Delhi High Court

79,582 judgments

Year:

Rishi Khurana & Ors. v. State & Anr.

13 Aug 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:6567

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and divorce decree, applying its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial disputes Section 498A IPC

Shiv Kumar & Ors. v. State & Ors.

13 Aug 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:6568

The Delhi High Court allowed quashing of an FIR under Sections 323, 308, 354, and 34 IPC based on an amicable compromise, applying principles under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR compromise heinous offences

Sunil v. State Govt. NCT of Delhi

13 Aug 2015 · Indermeet Kaur, J. · 2015:DHC:6556

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Sections 498A and 304B IPC, ruling that a demand of money linked to marriage constitutes dowry and that cruelty soon before death in connection with such demand justifies dowry death conviction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dowry death Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC dowry demand

Kallu Babu Rohatgi v. Raj Kumar Rohatgi & Ors.

13 Aug 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:6565

The Delhi High Court decreed the suit in terms of a court-mediated settlement prior to framing of issues and granted refund of court fees under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870.

civil appeal_allowed Settlement Agreement Court-annexed mediation Site plan Court Fees Act 1870

Kamaljeet Singh v. Central Bureau of Investigation

13 Aug 2015 · Siddharth Mridul · 2015:DHC:6574-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed suspension of sentence under Section 389 CrPC during the pendency of appeal in a Prevention of Corruption Act case due to delay in hearing and absence of the prime accused, imposing conditions to ensure the appellant's presence.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 389 CrPC Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 suspension of sentence bail during appeal

M/S Vital Castings Ltd & Anr. v. The Oriental Bank of Commerce & Anr.

13 Aug 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:6557

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a civil suit barred by SARFAESI Act jurisdiction, granted liberty to approach the DRT, and stayed auction proceedings for two weeks to facilitate settlement.

civil appeal_dismissed SARFAESI Act Section 34 civil court jurisdiction Debt Recovery Tribunal

Ajit R. Kyal v. Central Bureau of Investigation

13 Aug 2015 · Siddharth Mridul · 2015:DHC:6577-DB

The Delhi High Court suspended the sentence of a corruption convict during the pendency of his appeal due to delay in hearing and his compliance with bail conditions, imposing strict terms to ensure his presence.

criminal sentence_modified Significant suspension of sentence Section 389 CrPC Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 appeal delay

Mediciti Institute of Medical Sciences v. Union of India

13 Aug 2015 · G. Rohini; Jayant Nath · 2015:DHC:6548-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the rejection of renewal of additional MBBS seats by the Union of India based on MCI's recommendation, holding that an opportunity of hearing is mandatory and minor deficiencies should be rectified before refusal.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Medical Council of India renewal of permission opportunity of hearing Section 10-A(4) MCI Act

DOW JONES & COMPANY v. M/S INDIABULLS HOUSING FINANCE LTD & ORS

13 Aug 2015 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2015:DHC:6544-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of a 14-day delay in filing appeals by a foreign corporation, holding that bona fide procedural delays justify condonation under the Limitation Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay limitation period service of summons foreign corporation

Dalip Kumar v. Om Parkash & Ors.

13 Aug 2015 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2015:DHC:6581

The Delhi High Court held that tenancy rights under the Rent Act are partitionable assets and allowed the appeal directing a preliminary decree for partition among legal heirs.

civil appeal_allowed Significant partition of tenancy rights Rent Act legal heirs impartibility of tenancy

Reckitt Benckiser India Ltd v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr

13 Aug 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:6559

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against Reckitt Benckiser under the Insecticides Act due to delay causing expiry of the sample's shelf life, defeating the statutory right to retesting and amounting to abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Insecticides Act, 1968 Section 24(4) misbranding Central Insecticides Laboratory

Mahesh Jawa v. Shivam Infocom Pvt Ltd & Ors

13 Aug 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:6560

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition holding that salary and employment disputes lacking criminality are purely civil matters and do not warrant criminal proceedings.

criminal petition_dismissed salary dispute criminal proceedings civil nature misappropriation

Dr Ravi Shanker Garg & Anr v. State & Ors

13 Aug 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:6561

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR involving serious offences and public servants, holding that compromise between parties does not warrant quashing under Section 482 CrPC in such cases.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC compromise deed public servants

Dinesh and Ors. v. State and Anr.

13 Aug 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:6562

The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Sections 406/498A/34 IPC upon amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute non-compoundable offence

Reckitt Benckiser India Ltd v. Govt of NCT of Delhi

13 Aug 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:6563

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against Reckitt Benckiser under the Insecticides Act due to delay causing expiry of samples, defeating the right to retesting and rendering prosecution an abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Insecticides Act, 1968 Section 24(3) Section 24(4) misbranding

Surinder Singh v. State & Another

13 Aug 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:6564

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal case arising from a landlord-tenant dispute under Sections 436, 451, and 506 IPC based on mutual settlement, applying the principles of inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC mutual settlement landlord-tenant dispute

Vinod Kumar v. Commissioner of Police

13 Aug 2015 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2015:DHC:6583-DB

The Delhi High Court converted the dismissal of a police constable for unauthorized absence into compulsory retirement, emphasizing the principle of proportionality in disciplinary punishment.

administrative petition_allowed Significant departmental enquiry proportionality of punishment unauthorized absence compulsory retirement

Padam Singh v. Union of India & Ors.

12 Aug 2015 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Deepa Sharma · 2015:DHC:11558-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging denial of ACP benefits as withdrawn, directing petitioners to submit representations to the competent authority for decision within four weeks.

administrative appeal_dismissed Assured Career Progression ACP benefits writ petition departmental remedy

Indo Alusys Industries Ltd v. GNCT of Delhi & Anr

12 Aug 2015 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:11264-DB

The Delhi High Court held that punitive termination during probation requires inquiry and upheld monetary compensation in lieu of reinstatement for illegal termination without inquiry.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant termination probation punitive termination inquiry

Bayer Corporation v. Union of India & Ors.

12 Aug 2015 · The Chief Justice; Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2015:DHC:11263

The Delhi High Court held that a compulsory licence restricting use within India does not permit export of the patented drug abroad under Section 107-A, and directed expeditious disposal of the writ petition challenging such export.

intellectual_property other Significant compulsory licence Section 84 Patents Act Section 107-A Patents Act export of patented drug