Delhi High Court

79,582 judgments

Year:

Roche Products (India) Pvt Ltd & Ors. v. Drugs Controller General of India & Ors.

13 Aug 2015 · Manmohan Singh, J. · 2015:DHC:6555

The Delhi High Court restrained defendants from launching biosimilar Trastuzumab for additional indications without complying with interim injunctions and held that approval based on extrapolation is permissible but requires disclosure of material facts during litigation.

civil petition_dismissed Significant biosimilar drug approval extrapolation of indications Drugs and Cosmetics Act interim injunction

Mahavir Prasad v. State

13 Aug 2015 · Indermeet Kaur · 2015:DHC:6554

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of accused persons under Section 308/34 IPC due to contradictions in evidence and procedural lapses, emphasizing that appellate interference in acquittal orders requires compelling reasons.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant order of acquittal Section 308 IPC appellate interference identification parade

Commissioner of Income Tax Central-II v. Divine Infracon Pvt. Ltd.

13 Aug 2015 · S. Muralidhar; Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:6553-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the Revenue cannot challenge a CIT(A)'s finding not appealed against before the ITAT in an appeal filed by the Assessee, affirming the finality of such findings and limiting the Tribunal's jurisdiction to the subject matter of the appeal.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 153A Section 68 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Jamia Millia Islamia v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr.

13 Aug 2015 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2015:DHC:6552

The Delhi High Court held that a writ petition challenging property tax assessment under Section 123D of the DMC Act is not maintainable when an alternative statutory appeal remedy exists, and procedural compliance cannot be waived for a University.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant property tax Delhi Municipal Corporation Act Section 123D writ petition maintainability

Commissioner of Income Tax (C)-I v. MGF Automobiles Ltd.

13 Aug 2015 · S. Muralidhar; Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:6545-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court held that additions under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act must be based on incriminating material found during search, and absent such material, assessment orders disallowing amalgamation loss set-off were unsustainable.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 153A Income Tax Act Amalgamation losses set-off Incriminating material Search and seizure

Commissioner of Income Tax (C)-I v. MGF Automobiles Ltd.

13 Aug 2015 · S. Muralidhar; Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:6547-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court held that assessments under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act require incriminating material found during search, and absent such material, additions are unsustainable, dismissing Revenue's appeals.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 153A Section 72A Amalgamation

American School of Bombay Education Trust v. Union of India

13 Aug 2015 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2015:DHC:6546-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the CBDT's rejection of exemption under Section 10(23C)(vi) for an educational trust, directing grant of approval in line with Supreme Court precedent and clarifying the scope of conditions for exemption.

tax petition_allowed Significant Section 10(23C)(vi) Income-tax Act exemption application educational institution CBDT

Satbir Singh v. Financial Commissioner & Ors.

13 Aug 2015 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2015:DHC:6571

The Delhi High Court set aside the Financial Commissioner's order dismissing the revision without reasons and remanded the matter for fresh consideration in a land consolidation dispute under the East Punjab Holdings Act.

property other Significant East Punjab Holdings Act 1948 land consolidation Financial Commissioner reasoned order

Mela Ram Aggarwal v. Indu Devi

13 Aug 2015 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2015:DHC:6572

The High Court set aside the trial court's contradictory judgment in a possession suit and remanded the matter for fresh arguments to determine the respondent's status as licensee or tenant.

civil appeal_allowed Significant possession suit licensee vs tenant ownership of property contradictory findings

Mohd Ilyas v. Mohd Atiq

13 Aug 2015 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2015:DHC:6573

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the trial court's decree for recovery of a Rs. 5 lakh loan with interest, holding that credible evidence of loan payment and agreement outweighs bald denials and alleged tax violations.

civil appeal_dismissed loan agreement recovery suit loan repayment interest

Gautam Khanna v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

13 Aug 2015 · S.P. Garg · 2015:DHC:6569
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the conviction under Section 376 IPC due to inconsistencies and infirmities in the sole testimony of the prosecutrix, holding that such testimony must be reliable and of sterling quality to sustain conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant rape sole testimony prosecutrix Section 376 IPC

Inderpreet Kaur v. HDFC Bank

13 Aug 2015 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2015:DHC:6580-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the bank’s possession and sale notice under the SARFAESI Act, holding that a gift deed executed after mortgage creation cannot defeat the bank’s security interest.

civil petition_dismissed Gift Deed Mortgage SARFAESI Act Section 13(2)

Gian Chand Gupta & Anr. v. State & Anr.

13 Aug 2015 · Siddharth Mridul · 2015:DHC:6576-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Section 420 IPC arising from a property dispute following an amicable settlement between the parties and their undertaking to honor settlement terms.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 420 IPC Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement

GNCTD v. Ram Kishan

13 Aug 2015 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2015:DHC:6578-DB

The High Court held that a police officer cannot be subjected to double punishment for the same offence where a departmental enquiry and punishment preceded a criminal conviction, quashing the dismissal order and upholding the tribunal's decision.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Rule 11(1) Delhi Police Rules double punishment departmental enquiry criminal conviction

Lt. Col. Vijay Singh v. UOI and Anr.

13 Aug 2015 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Deepa Sharma · 2015:DHC:6584-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging denial of permanent secondment to DGQA, holding that final supersession disqualified the petitioner under longstanding eligibility criteria applied at the time of consideration.

administrative petition_dismissed permanent secondment DGQA final supersession eligibility criteria

Union of India v. Savita Khera & Ors.

13 Aug 2015 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2015:DHC:6579-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's application for restoration of a writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution due to failure to show sufficient cause for non-appearance and procedural lapses.

administrative petition_dismissed restoration of writ petition non-prosecution condonation of delay process fee

Commissioner of Income Tax Central-II v. Divine Infracon Pvt. Ltd.

13 Aug 2015 · S. Muralidhar; Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:6549-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the Revenue cannot challenge a CIT(A)'s finding on the scope of Section 153A in an appeal filed by the Assessee before the ITAT if the Revenue did not file a separate appeal on that issue.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 153A Income Tax Act Section 68 Income Tax Act Income Tax Appellate Tribunal jurisdiction Appeal scope

Kuldeep Kumar and Ors v. Commissioner of Police and Anr

13 Aug 2015 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2015:DHC:6582-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the use of a scaling method to adjust marks in a police recruitment exam, dismissing the petitioners' challenge to the altered marking scheme and affirming the fairness of the selection process.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant scaling method recruitment examination marking scheme principles of natural justice

Surender Kumar v. East Delhi Municipal Corporation

13 Aug 2015 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:6550-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that the appellant voluntarily abandoned his job and was not entitled to retrenchment compensation under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

labor appeal_dismissed voluntary abandonment retrenchement compensation Section 25F Industrial Disputes Act muster roll

Suraj v. State and Anr.

13 Aug 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:6558

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 308 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, applying its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC in light of Supreme Court precedents.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 308 IPC quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC non-compoundable offences