Delhi High Court

79,582 judgments

Year:

Vinod Kumar Jangid v. Government of National Capital Territory

14 Aug 2015 · Siddharth Mridul · 2015:DHC:6627-DB

The Delhi High Court held that it cannot interfere at the initial stage of investigation regarding territorial jurisdiction and that police authorities must decide and transfer FIRs if necessary under Section 156 CrPC.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant transfer of FIR territorial jurisdiction Section 156 CrPC High Court interference

Davender Kumar Singh v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr

14 Aug 2015 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2015:DHC:6615-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the disallowance of the petitioner from further recruitment tests, holding that absence of an appeal provision and delay in raising grievances do not warrant interference when the petitioner failed to qualify as per prescribed criteria.

administrative appeal_dismissed Physical Endurance and Measurement Test recruitment advertisement natural justice appeal provision

DELHI EPDP COOPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. v. REGISTRAR, COOP. SOCIETIES & ANR.

14 Aug 2015 · Gita Mittal; I. S. Mehta · 2015:DHC:6616-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the audit of co-operative society accounts must be completed within 120 days from 30th April, the prescribed date for making up accounts, and condoned a minimal delay caused by the auditor, setting aside penalty orders based on an incorrect deadline.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, 2003 audit deadline Section 60(1) Rule 38

Jagdish Singh v. State & Anr.

14 Aug 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:6617

The Delhi High Court upheld the order permitting handwriting expert examination of a cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act despite admitted signatures, holding that such admission only creates a rebuttable presumption.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act handwriting expert opinion rebuttable presumption cheque signature

Vijay Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi

14 Aug 2015 · Indermeet Kaur · 2015:DHC:6618

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of kidnapping and rape charges, holding that the minor prosecutrix was at the age of discretion and voluntarily accompanied the accused, rendering her consent valid under law.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant consent minor age of discretion kidnapping

PWI Northern Railway v. Jai Karan @ Nand Lal

14 Aug 2015 · Pratibha Rani · 2015:DHC:6628

The Delhi High Court dismissed Northern Railway's appeal challenging compensation awarded for permanent disability, affirming claimant's identity and the reasonableness of the award under the Motor Vehicles Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation permanent disability identity of claimant

Dilawar Sharma and Ors v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr

14 Aug 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:6610

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Section 308 IPC based on a compromise between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR non-compoundable offence Section 308 IPC

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pooja Sharma & Ors.

14 Aug 2015 · Pratibha Rani · 2015:DHC:6629

The Delhi High Court held that non-payment of annual authorization fee invalidating a vehicle permit does not constitute a fundamental breach entitling the insurer to recovery rights, dismissing the insurance company's appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 149(2)(i)(c) fundamental breach insurance recovery rights

Krishan Lal v. D.D.A.

14 Aug 2015 · S. Muralidhar · 2015:DHC:6608
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the DDA's review petition to recall its earlier judgment allotting a plot to a displaced person, on grounds of suspected forged official letters, condoning delay and restoring the writ petition for fresh consideration.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant review petition fabrication of documents presumption of genuineness Section 114(e) Indian Evidence Act

Amit Jain and Ors. v. State and Anr.

14 Aug 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:6601

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute non-compoundable offence

Rachna Pandey and Ors. v. State and Anr

14 Aug 2015 · Suresh Kait, J. · 2015:DHC:6599

The Delhi High Court quashed a road rage FIR under non-compoundable offences based on an amicable settlement between parties, affirming the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC non-compoundable offences settlement between parties

Tarun Kumar and Anr v. The State NCT of Delhi

14 Aug 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:6605

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC

Ram Sahu @ Ram v. State

14 Aug 2015 · S.P. Garg · 2015:DHC:6606

The Delhi High Court allowed the criminal appeal of Ram Sahu @ Ram in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered in a related case on the same day.

criminal appeal_allowed criminal appeal conviction sentence High Court of Delhi

Ajay Kumar v. State; Ram Sahu @ Ram v. State

14 Aug 2015 · S.P. Garg · 2015:DHC:6607

The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants accused of kidnapping and rape due to failure of prosecution to prove victim's minority and absence of consent beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant kidnapping rape consent minor

Union of India v. Cairn India Ltd & Ors.

14 Aug 2015 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:7328
Cites 0 · Cited by 16

The Delhi High Court held that challenges to an arbitral tribunal's jurisdiction post-final award must be pursued in the courts of the seat of arbitration, dismissing the suit for lack of territorial jurisdiction.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitral tribunal jurisdiction functus officio territorial jurisdiction seat of arbitration

Ashish Bhagat v. Veena Bhagat & Ors.

13 Aug 2015 · A.K. Pathak · 2015:DHC:11816

The Delhi High Court transferred a probate case to itself to be tried along with a civil suit involving the same Will and properties to avoid conflicting orders.

civil appeal_allowed Significant probate case transfer petition partition suit Will

Vikram Sachdeva & Anr v. State (GNCT of Delhi)

13 Aug 2015 · S. P. Garg · 2015:DHC:11249

The Delhi High Court allowed revision petitions setting aside non-bailable warrants against absent accused on their assurance to appear and payment of costs, withdrawing proceedings under Section 82 Cr.P.C.

criminal appeal_allowed non-bailable warrants Section 82 Cr.P.C. coercive steps interim protection

Deepak Kumar v. B D Sharma

13 Aug 2015 · Manmohan · 2015:DHC:10885

The Delhi High Court directed respondents to reinstate petitioners within eight weeks as per its earlier order, despite a pending Supreme Court petition, and disposed of contempt petitions with liberty to revive if non-compliance occurs.

administrative other contempt of court disobedience of court order reinstatement in service Special Leave Petition

Ved Bhushan v. Union of India & Ors.

13 Aug 2015 · Ved Prakash Vaish · 2015:DHC:6551

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging exclusion from the President’s Police Medal list, holding that seniority is a discretionary, not mandatory, criterion and the selection process was lawful.

administrative petition_dismissed President’s Police Medal Police Medal award recommendation seniority

DOW JONES & COMPANY v. M/S INDIABULLS HOUSING FINANCE LTD & ORS

13 Aug 2015 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2015:DHC:6542-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of a 14-day delay in filing appeals by a US-based corporation against an ex-parte injunction, holding the explanation bona fide and the appeals admitted despite contested service and jurisdiction issues.

civil petition_allowed Significant condonation of delay limitation period service of summons foreign corporation