Delhi High Court
79,582 judgments
Ramesh & Ors. v. State of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR involving serious offences and firing, holding that a crude compromise is insufficient to bypass trial once a charge-sheet is filed.
Tani Lal & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, applying the principles of inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Shree Beharijee Paper Mart v. Jain Enterprises
The Delhi High Court declined to quash a Section 138 NI Act complaint under its inherent jurisdiction, directing the petitioner to raise objections before the trial court at the framing of Notice stage under Section 251 Cr.P.C.
Shree Beharijee Paper Mart v. Jain Enterprises
The Delhi High Court held that inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should not be exercised to quash proceedings under Section 138 NI Act before the trial court frames Notice under Section 251 Cr.P.C., directing the petitioner to raise objections at the trial court stage.
Mahindeer Kaur & Ors. v. State (NCT Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court’s order allowing secondary evidence of lost original documents and FSL report under Section 65(c) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
Sunil Kumar v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Arun Kumar & Ors v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, applying the inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Anil Aggarwal v. State
The High Court upheld the acquittal in a cheque dishonour case, holding that the complainant failed to prove the existence of a legally enforceable debt despite statutory presumptions under the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Rajender Kanaujia v. Asha Rani Gupta
The High Court allowed the tenant limited additional time to conclude evidence in an eviction petition while emphasizing compliance with time-bound disposal directions.
Shivanu Mehta & Anr v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to quash an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, applying the principles under Section 482 CrPC.
Anil Kumar Matta v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a mediated settlement in a matrimonial dispute, affirming the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Manoj Kumar & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Aashik Saifi v. State (Govt. of NCT) of Delhi & Anr.
The appeal in Criminal Appeal No. 754/2013 was disposed of by referring to a common detailed judgment in Criminal Appeal No. 812/2013 without a separate order.
Afzal v. State (Govt. of NCT) of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of three appellants for raping a ten-year-old girl, affirming that credible child testimony alone can sustain conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC despite delay in FIR and minor discrepancies.
Hazrat Ali and Ors. v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Jitendra Singh Chahar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that personal illness does not constitute exceptional circumstances or public interest to revive a lapsed BSF appointment but directed medical verification before precluding future recruitment participation.
Renu Aggarwal v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the limitation period for filing an application for allotment of alternate plot is directory and must be computed from the date of obtaining the payment certificate, setting aside the rejection of the petitioner’s application on limitation grounds.
Ashoka Hotel v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's award reinstating a workman terminated without following due procedure under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, rejecting the management's plea of casual employment and improper legal representation.
Lalit Kapur v. Vinod Kumar Kapur & Ors.
The Delhi High Court decreed a partition suit based on a mutual settlement between the parties, granting equal shares and possession as agreed.
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited & Anr v. Sushil Kumar
The Delhi High Court held that revaluation of departmental examination answer scripts is barred by rules and courts cannot substitute their own evaluation, setting aside the Tribunal's order directing revaluation.