Delhi High Court

79,582 judgments

Year:

Sainath College of Education v. National Council for Teacher Education

18 Aug 2015 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking recognition and affiliation for the 2015-16 academic session due to delays, ordered inquiries into the delays, and emphasized adherence to prescribed timelines to prevent disruption of academic sessions.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant recognition affiliation D.El.Ed. course National Council for Teacher Education

Rajiv Kapoor v. Praveen Aggarwal

18 Aug 2015 · Manmohan · 2015:DHC:6685

The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition as barred by the one-year limitation under Section 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act, holding that failure to obtain a lift fitness certificate was a discrete act and not a continuous wrong.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 20 limitation contempt petition lift fitness certificate

Delhi Transport Corporation v. Bir Singh

18 Aug 2015 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:6683-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal of Delhi Transport Corporation, holding that habitual unauthorized absence without prior sanctioned leave justifies dismissal from service under the Standing Orders and Industrial Disputes Act.

labor appeal_allowed Significant unauthorized absence dismissal from service habitual absence disciplinary proceedings

R C Sood & Co Developers Pvt Ltd v. Anil Bansal & Ors.

18 Aug 2015 · Gita Mittal; I. S. Mehta · 2015:DHC:6715-DB

The High Court held that execution courts must implead and hear parties whose rights are affected, and that concealment of SARFAESI auction facts by judgment debtor and bank misled the court, granting liberty to the appellant to seek appropriate relief.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant execution proceedings SARFAESI Act concealment of facts misrepresentation

Rishi Raj v. S.A. Luthria

18 Aug 2015 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2015:DHC:6707

The Delhi High Court upheld the plaintiff's claim for Rs. 25 lakhs with interest based on an admitted settlement document, rejecting the defendant's forgery allegations and granting permanent injunction over film rights.

civil appeal_allowed Significant settlement of accounts signed document forgery allegation Indian Evidence Act

Society for Innovative Education and Development v. Union of India & Ors.

18 Aug 2015 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2015:DHC:6710-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is unpaid within five years, and that the 2015 Ordinance cannot retrospectively take away vested rights.

property petition_allowed Significant Section 24(2) of 2013 Act Land Acquisition Act 1894 acquisition proceedings lapse compensation payment

Savitri Aggarwal v. State through its Chief Secretary, Govt. of NCT of Delhi

18 Aug 2015 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2015:DHC:6709-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession and compensation are not completed within five years of the award.

property petition_allowed Significant Section 24(2) Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Land Acquisition Act, 1894 acquisition proceedings

Kartar Solanki v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

18 Aug 2015 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2015:DHC:6708-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is unpaid, and a 2015 Ordinance cannot retrospectively affect vested rights.

property petition_allowed Significant Section 24(2) of 2013 Act Land Acquisition Act 1894 lapse of acquisition proceedings compensation payment

Rahul Dubey v. State and Others

17 Aug 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:5737

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 279, 337, and 338 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR non-compoundable offences settlement between parties

Poonam Khurana & Anr. v. Ved Parkash Khurana & Anr.

17 Aug 2015 · Vipin Sanghi · 2015:DHC:6642
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the decree for possession based on a chain of documents and symbolic possession, dismissing the appellants' claim that the transaction was a loan and no actual possession was delivered.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant possession symbolic possession chain of documents Power of Attorney

Ahmad and Ors. v. The State Through Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr

17 Aug 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:6654

The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable offence FIR under Section 308 IPC based on a settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC after assessing the nature of the offence and likelihood of conviction.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR non-compoundable offence Section 308 IPC

S Harmeet Singh v. S Dalip Singh & Ors

17 Aug 2015 · Pratibha Rani · 2015:DHC:11801

The Delhi High Court dismissed transfer petitions seeking to move civil suits to another district as the petitioner no longer had any grievance against the current presiding judge, rendering the petitions infructuous.

civil appeal_dismissed transfer petition Section 24 CPC Section 151 CPC civil suits

B. Tiwary v. Union of India

17 Aug 2015 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2015:DHC:11528-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the transfer of a senior government engineer with less than two years to retirement, holding that transfers are an administrative prerogative absent mala fide or arbitrariness.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant transfer of government servant mala fide transfer administrative discretion service tenure

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-21 Delhi v. Ashokkumar

17 Aug 2015 · S. Muralidhar; Vibhu Bakhrru · 2015:DHC:11387-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeals, upholding the ITAT's decision that income from share transactions was capital gains and not business income based on factual findings.

tax appeal_dismissed Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 260A business income capital gains

School Management of Guru Harkrishan Public School v. The Director of Education

17 Aug 2015 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:11258-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of appeals by consent, directing the school management to frame a transfer policy ensuring employee transfers only to accessible schools within three months.

labor appeal_allowed transfer policy employee transfer school management consent terms

M/S INDIRA LODGING PVT LTD v. SURAT GOOD TRANSPORTPVT LTD

17 Aug 2015 · Pratibha Rani · 2015:DHC:10827

The Delhi High Court dismissed as withdrawn multiple transfer petitions seeking consolidation of eviction cases, leaving the matters to be adjudicated by the respective Additional Rent Controllers before whom they were pending.

civil appeal_dismissed transfer petition eviction petition Additional Rent Controller consolidation of cases

M/S SPREADHEAD DIGITAL STUDIO PVT LTD v. H K MITROO

17 Aug 2015 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:6637-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that an oral agreement collateral to a lease can be proved if not inconsistent with the lease, but the suit for specific performance was barred by limitation and liable to be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant oral agreement to sell specific performance limitation Order VII Rule 11 CPC

Suraj & Ors. v. Tata Sons & Anr.

17 Aug 2015 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:6636-DB

The Delhi High Court held that workmen gainfully employed or self-employed earning income comparable to last drawn wages are not entitled to relief under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act, dismissing their appeal against denial of back wages.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 17B Section 25F gainful employment

Rita Pal & Others v. Balbir Kohli

17 Aug 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:6662

The High Court declined to quash a criminal complaint under Section 500 IPC before framing of Notice under Section 251 Cr.P.C., directing the trial court to decide the matter after hearing both sides and applying its mind to the prima facie case.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. Section 251 Cr.P.C. quashing of complaint summoning order

Mohd Meharban & Ors. v. State & Anr.

17 Aug 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:6663

The Delhi High Court upheld the summoning order despite pending cancellation report and protest petition, holding that recording all witness depositions pre-summoning is not mandatory and such matters must be heard together by the Sessions Court under Section 210 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 210 Cr.P.C. cancellation report protest petition pre-summoning evidence