Delhi High Court
79,582 judgments
Skyway Ventures Limited v. Sai Industries Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application under Sections 390 and 391 of the Companies Act, 1956 to dispense with creditors' meetings and directed convening of equity shareholders' meetings to approve a Scheme of Arrangement between Skyway Ventures Limited and Sai Industries Limited.
Galaxy Commodities Private Limited v. Tex Apparels Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for sanctioning a Scheme of Amalgamation where all parties consented in writing and the court had jurisdiction.
N V Resorts Private Limited v. T & D Trading Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and unsecured creditors for sanctioning a Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, finding no prejudice to stakeholders.
Sunshine Global Agro Limited v. L M Technobuild Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application to dispense with certain shareholder and creditor meetings for a Scheme of Amalgamation, directing convening of others with prescribed procedural safeguards.
J.M. Infratech Private Limited v. J.M. Housing Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for a Scheme of Amalgamation where overwhelming written consents were obtained.
North Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Devi Dutt Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld the employer's right to recover damages for unauthorized occupation of official accommodation by deducting dues from the retired employee's pension and set aside the Industrial Tribunal's contrary award.
Puneet Singh v. Modern School & Anr
The court dismissed the petition seeking promotion to Class XII, holding that the petitioner failed to meet subject change deadlines and compartment exam eligibility criteria under CBSE and Delhi School Education Rules.
Paramjit Singh Alias Banty and Ors v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal proceeding under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Harish Manchanda and Ors v. State and Another
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
BAKSHI RAM & SONS (HUF) v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession is not taken and compensation not paid, and that mere deposit of compensation in treasury without possession does not prevent lapse.
State v. Amar Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld a lenient sentence for misbranding under the PFA Act, ruling that enhancing sentence after a plea of guilt given under assurance of leniency violates Article 21 and that the High Court has concurrent jurisdiction to entertain such appeals.
Shri Ranbir Singh & Anr. v. Shri Bhup Singh & Ors.
The court held that without pleading and proof of loss, a seller cannot forfeit the entire advance paid under an Agreement to Sell, limiting forfeiture to a nominal amount under Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act.
Harpreet Singh Makbkar v. Punjab and Sind Bank
The Delhi High Court held that departmental proceedings initiated after retirement and beyond the four-year limitation period under Punjab and Sind Bank Pension Regulations are barred and quashed the charge sheets issued against retired employees.
Praveen Arora v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable mediated settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Balal Sher @ Bilal Sher v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under the Indian Electricity Act and IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Yogesh Chandra Goyal & Anr v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr
The High Court declined to quash summons under Sections 409/420/120-B IPC and Companies Act, holding that petitioners must seek discharge before the trial court, and granted conditional exemption from personal appearance during preliminary proceedings.
Parvin Kumar & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
M/S Vishnu & Co Pvt Ltd v. Superintendent Central Excise
The Delhi High Court declined to quash the FIR under the Central Excise Act, holding that the petitioners must first raise their pleas before the trial court, as an alternate remedy is available.
Charanjeet Gupta @ Suyesh Gupta & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Suresh @ Tau & Anr v. State & Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 308/34 IPC on the basis of amicable settlement between neighbors, applying the principles under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.