Delhi High Court

80,866 judgments

Year:

Science Olympiad Foundation v. Shivalik Olympiad Foundation

31 Aug 2015 · Manmohan Singh · 2015:DHC:7150

The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining the defendant from using the plaintiff's registered trademark "SOF" and related marks, holding that such use prima facie constituted trademark infringement and passing off.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off interim injunction Olympiad exams

Sharda Devi v. Akshay Khandelwal

31 Aug 2015 · V.K. Shali · 2015:DHC:7153

The Delhi High Court upheld the grant of leave to defend to a tenant, holding that a financially independent son running his own business is not dependent on the landlord for accommodation under bona fide requirement eviction grounds.

property appeal_dismissed Significant bona fide requirement Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 leave to defend dependency for accommodation

Ashok Goel v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

31 Aug 2015 · Ashutosh Kumar · 2015:DHC:7154

The Delhi High Court held that Delhi Police had territorial jurisdiction to investigate the FIR under Sections 409 and 420 IPC and dismissed the petition seeking quashing or transfer of investigation to Ghaziabad.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant territorial jurisdiction investigation Section 156 CrPC Section 170 CrPC

Aero Club v. Commissioner, Trade & Taxes, Delhi

31 Aug 2015 · S. Muralidhar; Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:7143-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and quashed the penalty imposed under DVAT Act where the dealer promptly produced valid import documents despite initial absence of bill with one of two vehicles transporting the consignment.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 Section 86(19) penalty Mal Roko Aadesh bill of entry

Amit Katyal v. Harsh Gupta

31 Aug 2015 · Vipin Sanghi · 2015:DHC:7149

The Delhi High Court held that demolition of tenanted shops for road widening extinguished tenancy under Section 111(c) of the Transfer of Property Act, dismissing appeals claiming surviving tenancy over minor remaining structures.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Transfer of Property Act Section 111(c) Delhi Rent Control Act Section 50

Larsen and Toubro Ltd. v. Lachmi Narain Trades and Ors.

31 Aug 2015 · Manmohan Singh · 2015:DHC:7144

The Delhi High Court held that the defendants' use of the mark "LNT/ELENTE" was deceptively similar to plaintiff Larsen & Toubro's "L&T" mark, constituting passing off, and granted permanent injunction restraining such use.

civil appeal_allowed Significant passing off trademark infringement likelihood of confusion goodwill

Raju & Anr v. Kanti Devi

31 Aug 2015 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2015:DHC:7145

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging a registered relinquishment deed, holding that fraud was not proved and the deed validly vested property rights in the plaintiff.

civil appeal_dismissed relinquishment deed fraud burden of proof registered document

Master Subin Babu v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

31 Aug 2015 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2015:DHC:7146

The Delhi High Court upheld the aided school's authority to conduct a screening test for Class XI Commerce with Mathematics admission and dismissed the petition alleging discrimination and entitlement without passing the test.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant aided schools admission criteria screening test Class XI admission

G.L. Sagar v. Union of India

31 Aug 2015 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2015:DHC:7106

The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal order and remanded the matter for fresh decision after holding that the disciplinary authority violated natural justice by not giving the petitioner an opportunity to respond to its disagreement with the enquiry officer's findings.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary proceedings natural justice note of disagreement enquiry officer findings

Jaibeer Singh v. Jai Bhagwan Singh

31 Aug 2015 · Vipin Sanghi · 2015:DHC:7107

The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendant's second appeal and refused to admit additional evidence at the appellate stage, upholding the trial court's decree for recovery of Rs.2,40,500 with interest in a loan dispute.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order 41 Rule 27 CPC additional evidence loan recovery suit material evidence

Amit Katyal v. Harsh Gupta

31 Aug 2015 · Vipin Sanghi · 2015:DHC:7148

The Delhi High Court held that demolition of tenanted shops and the underlying land for road widening terminates the lease under Section 111(c) of the Transfer of Property Act, dismissing appeals claiming surviving tenancy over remaining structures.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Transfer of Property Act Section 111(c) Delhi Rent Control Act demolition

Malkeet Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

31 Aug 2015 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:7555-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a review petition challenging its earlier decision, reaffirming that review under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC is limited to correcting errors apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used as an appeal in disguise.

civil petition_dismissed Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC Review petition Error apparent on the face of the record Letters Patent Appeal

C.S. Malik v. Council of Scientific & Industrial Research & Anr

31 Aug 2015 · C. Hari Shankar; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:8856-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed a hastily issued charge sheet against a retired CSIR officer for violating natural justice and directed payment of interest on delayed retirement benefits, while upholding procedural safeguards for post-retirement disciplinary action.

administrative petition_allowed Significant disciplinary proceedings superannuation charge sheet natural justice

Pranab Gobinda Bhaumik v. Chandu Yadav and Ors.

28 Aug 2015 · Jayant Nath, J. · 2015:DHC:7060

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for permanent disability and pain suffered by the appellant in a motor accident claim, increasing disability percentage and future medical expenses while rejecting unsubstantiated claims for extended loss of income and additional physiotherapy costs.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim permanent disability functional disability loss of income

Rohit Rishi v. Rahul Rishi

28 Aug 2015 · JAYANT NATH · 2015:DHC:7058

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's application for a decree of partition under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC, holding that the defendant's pleadings did not contain clear and unequivocal admissions entitling the plaintiff to relief without trial.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order 12 Rule 6 CPC decree on admissions partition suit property dispute

Bhumika Enterprises v. Commissioner Value Added Tax & Anr.

28 Aug 2015 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2015:DHC:11537-DB

Delhi High Court quashed system generated tax notices and orders issued without human intervention under the Delhi VAT Act, emphasizing adherence to natural justice and due process.

tax petition_allowed Significant Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 Section 59(2) system generated notices natural justice

Aditya Goel and Ors. v. State and Anr.

28 Aug 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:7059

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, and 120B IPC based on a family settlement, emphasizing the sparing exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC and imposing costs for public resources used.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR non-compoundable offences settlement between parties

Dal Chand v. Union of India

28 Aug 2015 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Deepa Sharma · 2015:DHC:11566-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to grant the second financial upgradation under the ACP Scheme dated 09.08.1999 to eligible CRPF personnel within eight weeks based on their original dates of appointment.

administrative petition_allowed Assured Career Progression Scheme second financial upgradation CRPF service benefits

Hungama Digital Media Entertainment P VT Ltd v. M/S ADB Mobile Entertainment & Ors

28 Aug 2015 · JAYANT NATH · 2015:DHC:7057

The Delhi High Court held that interrogatories seeking detailed business documents unrelated to defamatory statements are not relevant and refused leave to deliver such interrogatories in a defamation suit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order 11 Rules 1 and 2 CPC interrogatories defamation suit relevance of interrogatories

Virender Kumar Singh v. CBI

28 Aug 2015 · Suresh Kait, J. · 2015:DHC:7056
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of charges under the Prevention of Corruption Act, holding that the trial court rightly found prima facie material to proceed with the trial.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 482 CrPC framing of charges Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 prima facie case