Delhi High Court
80,866 judgments
Swastik Industrial Powerline Ltd v. Commissioner Trade & Taxes Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a selling dealer is entitled to claim deduction for sales made against genuine ST-1 Forms without being responsible for discrepancies in purchasing dealers' accounts, allowing the appeal and setting aside the denial of deduction.
Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-III v. Kabul Chawla
The Delhi High Court held that additions to completed income tax assessments under Section 153A are unsustainable without incriminating material found during search, dismissing Revenue's appeals for AYs 2002-03, 2005-06, and 2006-07.
DDA v. Central Timber Traders
The Delhi High Court held that a suit challenging a continuing demand for lease premium by the DDA was not barred by limitation as each fresh demand gave rise to a fresh cause of action.
Kohinoor Club Private Limited v. T.S. Kisan and Company Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between a wholly owned subsidiary and its parent company under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with meetings and approving dissolution without winding up.
Late Prem Raj Chaudhary Thr Legal Heirs v. Babu Ram & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of registered sale deeds and dismissed the plaintiff’s suit and review petition for lack of proof and delay, affirming the presumption of validity of registered documents and the necessity of registered revocation of power of attorney.
Roop Chand v. Delhi Transport Corporation
The Delhi High Court set aside a departmental enquiry and removal order against a workman for violation of natural justice, granting partial back wages due to the petitioner’s superannuation.
Abdul Quadir Khan v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the dismissal of a CRPF personnel for threatening his commander with a loaded rifle, holding that the disciplinary proceedings were fair and the punishment justified.
H.P. Gupta v. Delhi Administration
The Delhi High Court set aside compulsory retirement imposed on a college employee for negligence, holding that mere negligence without gross misconduct does not justify severe disciplinary penalties.
Saifuddin Choudhary v. Bartaman Limited and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a suit for defamation abates on the death of the plaintiff before decree, and legal heirs cannot continue the suit.
Mahabir Singh v. Prabha Gautam
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal seeking interim possession relief, directing maintenance of status quo pending suit proceedings based on the respondent's undertaking.
Ashis Jain v. Govt of NT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s application to recall the complainant for cross-examination under Section 311 Cr.P.C., emphasizing that delay alone cannot justify rejection if cross-examination is essential for a fair trial.
Mahanand v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the reversion of a CISF officer due to an erroneous seniority number but directed grant of MACP benefits and correction of promotion panel seniority.
Sanjay Dogra & Ors. v. The State (Delhi Admn.) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, applying the inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Sanjeev Kumar @ Sonu & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement, applying the inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to secure the ends of justice.
Aditi Upadhyay v. Lalit Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for declaration and partition, holding that no oral family settlement existed and a valid Will excluded her claim to the disputed properties.
Sushil Bidhuri v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 392/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties at the initial investigation stage, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Sujauddin Khan and Others v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Others
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 308 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Mohd Faizan Alias Popi and Others v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Another
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 324/323/341/427/34 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between parties at the investigation stage, affirming the High Court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to do so in appropriate cases.
Mohd Ashraf and Others v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Another
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 435/34 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between parties at the initial investigation stage, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Parveen Jain v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 406, 498A, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.