Delhi High Court

80,866 judgments

Year:

Ram Kishore v. State of NCT Delhi and Anr

08 Sep 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:7400

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 288 and 304A IPC on the basis of a settlement and compensation paid to the victim's family, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC non-compoundable offences settlement between parties

Saddam v. State NCT of Delhi

08 Sep 2015 · Suresh Kait, J. · 2015:DHC:7401
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed FIR under Section 308 IPC based on a compromise between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC, emphasizing that even non-compoundable offences can be quashed if continuation of proceedings is unjust.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR non-compoundable offence Section 308 IPC

Sanjiv Kumar v. State and Anr.

08 Sep 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:7402
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 406 and 498A IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial disputes non-compoundable offences

SUDI-JA v. STATE NCT OF DELHI

08 Sep 2015 · Indermeet Kaur, J. · 2015:DHC:11956

The Delhi High Court set aside the dowry death conviction due to lack of proof of dowry demand but upheld cruelty conviction under Section 498-A IPC against the husband, while acquitting the sister-in-law.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry death Section 304-B IPC Section 498-A IPC cruelty

M/S. Hamar Television Network Pvt Ltd v. Asst. Provident Fund Commissioner Delhi (North) Delhi

08 Sep 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:11544

The Delhi High Court held that delay beyond 120 days in filing appeals under the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 cannot be condoned, dismissing petitions challenging dismissal of time-barred appeals.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 limitation period condonation of delay Section 5 Limitation Act

Bisheshwar Jha v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr.

08 Sep 2015 · V. P. Vaish · 2015:DHC:11527

The Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation and blacklisting of parking contracts by SDMC for failure to provide an opportunity of hearing, directing a fresh hearing and speaking order.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant natural justice opportunity of hearing contract cancellation blacklisting

J. N. Prabhakarudu v. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation

08 Sep 2015 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2015:DHC:11454

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by J. N. Prabhakarudu against ONGC as withdrawn on the petitioner's request.

other petition_dismissed Procedural writ petition withdrawal petition dismissed High Court of Delhi

Brij Mohan Banerjee v. State of Delhi & Ors

08 Sep 2015 · S. P. Garg · 2015:DHC:11304

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the revision petition with liberty to file a fresh revision petition against the order on charge, disposing of all pending applications.

criminal appeal_allowed Procedural revision petition withdrawal liberty to file order on charge

Akash Builders v. Union of India

08 Sep 2015 · Najmi Waziri · 2015:DHC:10799

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, after objections to the respondent's delayed appointment, thereby ensuring arbitration proceedings could commence.

civil appeal_allowed Arbitration Section 11 Arbitration & Conciliation Act Appointment of Arbitrator Delhi High Court International Arbitration Centre

Inderpeet Singh Chawla v. State

08 Sep 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:7393
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC based on a genuine settlement and divorce decree, applying inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC

Rajesh Kumar Arora and Ors. v. The State of Govt of NCT Delhi and Anr

08 Sep 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:7394

The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable offence FIR under Section 308 IPC based on a full settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR non-compoundable offences Section 308 IPC

Rabbu Khan and Ors v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr

08 Sep 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:7395

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act on the basis of an amicable settlement between parties at the initial investigation stage, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute settlement

Imran Hussain v. State NCT of Delhi

08 Sep 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:7397
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 308 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC while applying Supreme Court guidelines.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR non-compoundable offence Section 308 IPC

Pavan Datta v. State

08 Sep 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:7396

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for bail of the accused managing director in a cheating case involving misappropriation of investor funds due to non-compliance with bail conditions and lack of cooperation.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail Section 439 CrPC cheating criminal conspiracy

Kavita v. Sandeep @ Sonu

08 Sep 2015 · Indermeet Kaur, J. · 2015:DHC:7428

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused, holding that consensual physical relations without an initial fraudulent promise of marriage do not constitute rape or cheating under IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape promise of marriage cheating criminal intimidation

Rajender Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

08 Sep 2015 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Deepa Sharma · 2015:DHC:7427-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a CRPF employee for misconduct despite his criminal acquittal, holding that departmental enquiry findings stand unless vitiated, while leaving compassionate allowance claims open for separate consideration.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant departmental enquiry dismissal from service criminal acquittal disciplinary proceedings

Bhawani Shanker Tank v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

08 Sep 2015 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2015:DHC:7438-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging removal from service for submission of a fake OBC certificate, holding that the disciplinary authority complied with natural justice and the certificate was not issued by the competent authority as required.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disciplinary proceedings natural justice fake certificate OBC certificate

Queeny Pradhan v. Rakesh Kumar

08 Sep 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:7414

The Delhi High Court decreed a divorce suit by accepting a mutually agreed settlement reached through mediation, emphasizing the enforceability of such agreements in matrimonial disputes.

family appeal_allowed Settlement Agreement Divorce by mutual consent Maintenance Mediation

Union Public Service Commission v. Rajveer Singh Verma & Anr

08 Sep 2015 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2015:DHC:7418-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed UPSC's writ petitions challenging the CAT order on candidate selection, allowing UPSC to file a review petition and suspending the CAT order pending review.

administrative appeal_dismissed Procedural Union Public Service Commission Central Administrative Tribunal shortlisting criteria recruitment rules

Union Public Service Commission v. Rajveer Singh Verma & Anr

08 Sep 2015 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2015:DHC:7419-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed UPSC's writ petitions as not pressed, allowed filing of a review against the CAT order with stay granted pending review, emphasizing procedural safeguards without deciding on recruitment merits.

administrative appeal_dismissed Procedural Central Administrative Tribunal Union Public Service Commission shortlisting criteria recruitment rules