Delhi High Court

77,325 judgments

Year:

VIR SINGH v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

09 Oct 2015 · G.S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2015:DHC:8524-DB

The Delhi High Court remanded the matter to the Central Administrative Tribunal to decide on the petitioner's entitlement to interest on pension and retirement benefits, which was not previously considered.

administrative other pension retirement benefits interest Central Administrative Tribunal

RKDF Medical College Hospital and Research Centre v. Union of India

09 Oct 2015 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2015:DHC:8513

Delhi High Court allowed provisional admission of medical students pending final adjudication of petition challenging Central Government's refusal to renew admission permission, emphasizing proper application of mind and adherence to Supreme Court's extended deadline.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Medical College Admission Central Government Decision Medical Council of India Faculty Deficiency

Omakari & Ors v. Union of India (Ministry of Railway)

09 Oct 2015 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2015:DHC:8514

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the Tribunal's finding of natural death and refused to condone the 140-day delay in filing the appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed death claim train accident natural cause of death delay in filing appeal

Ajay Maken v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

09 Oct 2015 · G. Rohini; Jayant Nath · 2015:DHC:8511-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking directions for dengue control measures, holding that the government had already taken adequate steps and must ensure proper fund utilization and monitoring.

administrative petition_dismissed Public Interest Litigation Dengue Control Government Fund Utilization Municipal Corporations

Sunder Kukreja & Ors. v. Mohan Lal Kukreja & Anr.

09 Oct 2015 · S. Muralidhar · 2015:DHC:8515

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding a retirement deed forged and partnership deed valid, dismissing defendants' objections and affirming plaintiffs' rights in the partnership.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration award partnership deed retirement deed forgery

Satyawan v. UOI & Ors.

09 Oct 2015 · Vipin Sanghi · 2015:DHC:8535

The Delhi High Court allowed a second appeal setting aside the dismissal of a first appeal as time-barred, holding that courts must liberally construe 'sufficient cause' under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to advance substantial justice.

civil appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay Section 5 Limitation Act sufficient cause first appeal

Raisa Begum v. State

09 Oct 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:8520

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition directing police to register FIR and investigate allegations of forgery and impersonation, clarifying the scope of Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. and the Priyanka Srivastava judgment.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Section 154(3) Cr.P.C. FIR registration Magistrate's jurisdiction

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-8 v. Sardar Exhibitors Pvt. Ltd.

09 Oct 2015 · S. Muralidhar; Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:11732-DB

The Delhi High Court condoned a 120-day delay in re-filing an income tax appeal but dismissed the appeal based on a prior decision involving the same parties.

tax appeal_dismissed delay condonation income tax appeal res judicata re-filing appeal

The New Bhim Handloom Co-Operative Industrial (P) Society Ltd. v. The Administrator / Lt. Governor Through Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors

09 Oct 2015 · Gita Mittal; L. S. Mehta · 2015:DHC:11401-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed as withdrawn writ petitions filed by cooperative societies after the Registrar granted permission to conduct audits, rendering the petitions infructuous.

administrative appeal_dismissed writ petition cooperative societies audit permission Registrar of Cooperative Societies

Hemant Kumar Sharma v. University of Delhi & Ors.

09 Oct 2015 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:11254-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's administrative service extension appeal for non-prosecution due to his absence at the hearing.

administrative appeal_dismissed Procedural non-prosecution appeal dismissal extension of service minor penalty proceedings

Satyam Finlease Pvt Ltd v. Lalit Kumar & Anr

09 Oct 2015 · S. P. Garg · 2015:DHC:11252

The Delhi High Court disposed of criminal revision petitions challenging conviction under Section 138 NI Act as settled following a compromise between the parties.

criminal other Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act criminal revision petition conviction under NI Act settlement in criminal case

SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT v. SIEMENS PROJECT INDIA PVT. LTD.

09 Oct 2015 · Manmohan Singh · 2015:DHC:8561

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and punitive damages against a defendant for unauthorized use of the well-known SIEMENS trademark and deceptively similar domain name, affirming protection against trademark infringement and passing off.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off permanent injunction punitive damages

Union of India and Anr. v. S.S. Singh

09 Oct 2015 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2015:DHC:8562-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's order quashing the penalty of censure imposed without a charge and without affording an opportunity of hearing, affirming the principle that no employee can be punished for uncharged allegations in disciplinary proceedings.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disciplinary proceedings natural justice opportunity of hearing charge not levelled

UOI & Anr. v. Madan Lal Sharma & Ors.

09 Oct 2015 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:8556-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed review petitions filed by the Union of India against earlier orders in connected writ petitions, holding that review jurisdiction is limited and no error apparent on record justified interference.

administrative appeal_dismissed review petition error apparent on face of record service matters Indian Railways

Rajesh & Ors. v. State & Anr.

09 Oct 2015 · P. S. Teji · 2015:DHC:8544

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes upon amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process of law.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC

Ramji Lal v. State (NCT of Delhi)

09 Oct 2015 · P. S. Teji · 2015:DHC:8546

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a dacoity case after prolonged custody and ongoing trial, emphasizing that bail may be allowed when investigation is complete and trial is pending.

criminal appeal_allowed bail Section 439 CrPC dacoity prolonged custody

Sandeep Kumar v. The State & Anr

09 Oct 2015 · P. S. Teji · 2015:DHC:8547

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 336/34 IPC and Arms Act on the basis of amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR compromise inherent powers

Mohan Lal Mehta & Ors. v. State & Anr.

09 Oct 2015 · P. S. Teji · 2015:DHC:8543

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 compromise

Rajia Begum v. The State

09 Oct 2015 · P. S. Teji · 2015:DHC:8540

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a dowry death case, holding that custodial interrogation was unnecessary as the petitioner cooperated with the investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC custodial interrogation dowry harassment

Gurdeep Arora & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

09 Oct 2015 · P. S. Teji · 2015:DHC:8545

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 324/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, reaffirming the scope of inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process in non-heinous offence cases.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR compromise inherent powers