Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Anil Khanna & Anr v. State (N.C.T., Delhi) & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellants' applications for additional evidence and forensic examination in a probate appeal, holding that the conditions under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC were not met and reaffirming that probate judgments are binding in rem.
Green Work Metal v. Principal Commissioner of GST & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires objective satisfaction and opportunity to be heard, and modified the cancellation to operate from the date of the petitioner’s application.
Shri Rajiv Kumar & Anr v. Shri Chaman Lal & Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that the tenant failed to establish a prima facie case to contest the landlord's bona fide requirement for possession.
NBCC India Limited v. Ramacivil India Constructions Private Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed NBCC's appeal and directed removal of Ramacivil's name from the Holiday List, holding that continuing blacklisting despite a court stay is arbitrary and unlawful.
Puneet Kumar v. Anju Kumari & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the husband's appeal, holding that enhanced maintenance for the son is payable only from the date fixed by the lower court, not from the date of the application.
Hindustan Vegetable Oil Corporation Ltd. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court ordered the dissolution of Hindustan Vegetable Oil Corporation Ltd. under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 2013, concluding winding up proceedings after transfer of assets and liabilities to the Union of India.
Geeta Nagar v. The State of NCT Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court refused to order production of an adult daughter who voluntarily married and chose to live with her husband, directing police protection for the couple against family threats.
MAN TRUCK BUS SE v. ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF PATENTS DESIGNS
The Delhi High Court set aside the rejection of a patent application due to lack of reasoned analysis and violation of natural justice, remanding the matter for fresh consideration with all objections properly communicated.
Rajesh Devi v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the dismissal of the petitioner's husband from the Army, upholding the Armed Forces Tribunal's rejection of the claim due to inordinate delay and laches.
Ambrish Radheshyam Tiwari v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Court dismissed the habeas corpus petition seeking custody of an adult married woman who voluntarily chose to live with her parents, affirming her personal liberty and autonomy.
State Bank of India v. Asha Enterprises Private Limited
The Delhi High Court condoned delay in refiling arbitration challenge petitions but held it lacks pecuniary jurisdiction as claims are below Rs. 2 crores, directing petitions to be filed in the competent District Court.
Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd. v. Dabur India Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the timelines for filing evidence in trademark opposition proceedings under Rule 50 of the 2002 Rules are mandatory, and failure to comply results in deemed abandonment, but delayed service of evidence does not amount to abandonment if evidence was filed within time.
Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd. v. Dabur India Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the time limits for filing evidence in trademark opposition proceedings under Rule 50 of the 2002 Rules are mandatory, and failure to comply results in deemed abandonment, but directed the Registrar to decide the opposition on merits given the facts of delayed service.
Khalid Akhtar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an APAR graded solely by the Initiating Officer without remarks from the Reviewing or Accepting Officer is invalid and quashed the impugned orders accordingly.
Om Prakash Verma v. National Testing Agency & Anr.
The court held that judicial interference with examination answer keys is permissible only in rare cases where the key answer is clearly and demonstrably wrong, and applied this principle to find the NTA's answer key partially incorrect in the UGC-NET exam.
Praveen Kumar v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a Habeas Corpus petition seeking production of the petitioner’s wife after she appeared voluntarily and denied allegations of unlawful detention.
Krishna Mahto v. State of NCT and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a major daughter who has voluntarily married has the right to live with her husband and refused to direct police to register an FIR for abduction, dismissing the petition seeking her production.
Court on Its Own Motion v. Narender Bhutani
The Delhi High Court accepted the respondent's unconditional apology for inadvertent contemptuous remarks and discharged him from contempt proceedings, directing no future reference to the withdrawn remarks.
Anand International and Ors. v. Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court held that the adjudication of a Show Cause Notice under the Customs Act must be deferred until disposal of the pending CESTAT appeal, excluding the appeal period from the statutory limitation.
Principal Commissioner of Customs v. Tasha Gold Pvt. Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the Tribunal's order permitting provisional release of gold dore bars imported under a preferential tariff scheme, holding that testing margins and factual circumstances justified the release.