Delhi High Court

35,876 judgments

Year:

Savitri Devi v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd

14 May 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:4263

The Delhi High Court modified the deduction for personal expenses from 50% to one-third in a motor accident claim where the bachelor deceased was the sole earning member of a large dependent family, remanding the matter for recalculation of compensation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act compensation personal and living expenses deduction Sarla Verma

National Seeds Corporation Ltd v. Associated Jute Industries

14 May 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:3741-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and refused to condone a 315-day delay in filing under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, holding that protracted settlement negotiations do not constitute sufficient cause for delay.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 37 appeal condonation of delay sufficient cause

M/S KLA CONST TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD v. M/S GULSHAN HOMZ PRIVATE LIMITED

14 May 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:4217
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that it has exclusive jurisdiction to appoint an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act where the contract designates Delhi as one of the arbitration seats, emphasizing harmonious construction of arbitration and jurisdiction clauses.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration seat territorial jurisdiction Section 11 Arbitration Act harmonious construction

Chishtiya Khuddam Khwaja Sahib Syedzadgan Dargah Sharif, Ajmer v. Union of India

14 May 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:4171

The Delhi High Court held that an audit under Section 20 of the CAG Act can only proceed after the CAG consents and terms are agreed upon, and the audited body is given a meaningful opportunity to represent against a concrete proposal.

administrative other Significant Comptroller and Auditor General Act, 1971 Section 20 CAG Act audit of accounts reasonable opportunity to represent

Zorawar Singh; Peechu Singh; Rohan v. Jawaharlal Nehru University & Ors.

14 May 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:3977

The Delhi High Court stayed the termination of a professor by JNU due to procedural irregularities in the sexual harassment inquiry and failure to issue a mandatory show cause notice under the JNU Act.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act Internal Complaints Committee Procedural irregularities Show cause notice

Bhagwan Sahai Sharma v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 13 -1 Delhi and Anr.

14 May 2025 · Vibhu BakhrU; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:3960-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a reassessment notice issued beyond three years without prior approval under Section 151(ii) of the Income Tax Act is invalid, setting aside the notice and proceedings initiated thereunder.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 notice Section 151 approval Reassessment proceedings

Nasir v. Ashwani Kumar Wadhwa and Others

14 May 2025 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2025:DHC:4043

The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for partition and injunctions based on an unregistered Agreement to Sell, holding that such an agreement does not confer ownership or enforceable possession rights under the law.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant unregistered Agreement to Sell Section 17(1)(A) Registration Act Section 53A Transfer of Property Act partition suit

Staff Selection Commission & Anr. v. Veerendra Singh

14 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:3794-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the CAT order due to unexplained delay, emphasizing that inordinate delay and laches bar interference under Article 226.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant delay and laches writ petition Article 226 Central Administrative Tribunal

Staff Selection Commission & Ors. v. Avgalla Meena

14 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:3793-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Tribunal's order for a fresh medical examination due to inordinate and unexplained delay, emphasizing that delay and laches bar the exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant delay and laches writ petition Article 226 extraordinary jurisdiction

Harish Kumar v. UOI & Ors.

14 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:3769-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Tribunal’s order denying relaxation of mandatory foot-plate experience for Railway promotion, holding no valid relaxation was granted and the petitioner was rightly de-empaneled.

administrative petition_dismissed promotion eligibility Railway Board Circular foot-plate experience relaxation of conditions

Ajay Kumar Sharma v. Vivek Bharat Ram & Ors.

14 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 4 SCC 8

The Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal against an interlocutory order recording prima facie views on Trust Deed amendments and audit, holding such orders non-appealable and courts cannot rewrite Trust Deeds in civil suits.

civil appeal_dismissed interlocutory order appealability Order XXXIX CPC Order XLIII Rule 1(r) CPC

Mahender Singh Dhakad v. Shruti Rathore

14 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:3798-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's order granting interim maintenance to the legally wedded wife, ruling that the husband's financial obligations to a live-in partner do not absolve him from maintaining his wife under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act.

family appeal_dismissed Significant interim maintenance Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 24 legally wedded wife

University of Delhi v. Dr. Ravindra Narayan Mishra & Ors.

14 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:3720-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the University of Delhi's appeal, holding that the respondent's entire service from initial temporary appointment counts for pension under the Old Pension Scheme, excluding applicability of the New Pension Scheme.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant pension Old Pension Scheme New Pension Scheme temporary appointment

Rabobank v. State Bank of Hyderabad

14 May 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:3976

The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Section 115 CPC challenging territorial jurisdiction in a commercial dispute, holding that such disputes must be governed by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

civil petition_dismissed Section 115 CPC Commercial Courts Act 2015 territorial jurisdiction commercial dispute

TAPI PRESTRESSED PRODUCTS LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

14 May 2025 · PRATHIBA M. SINGH; RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA · 2025:DHC:3853-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST demand orders due to non-communication of show cause notices on the GST portal, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of the impugned notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant GST notifications Section 168A CGST Act show cause notice natural justice

VERTO BIZSERV v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS

14 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3854-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a cryptic ex-parte GST adjudication order for violation of natural justice and granted the petitioner an opportunity to be heard, leaving the validity of extension notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice Principles of Natural Justice Section 168A GST Act Extension of Limitation

Mohit Bhunsali v. Intec Capital Ltd. & Ors.

14 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3948

The Delhi High Court recalled bailable warrants issued in execution proceedings pending consideration of an application invoking the statutory moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, emphasizing procedural fairness.

civil petition_dismissed Procedural Execution Petition bailable warrants Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 96

Hardesh Kumar Arora v. Praveen Kumar Chhabra

14 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3947

The High Court held that a suit combining commercial and non-commercial causes of action cannot be summarily dismissed for misjoinder at the initial stage and directed the Trial Court to decide the issue at final judgment.

civil petition_dismissed Procedural Commercial Court misjoinder of causes of action commercial dispute friendly loan

TDI Infrastructure Limited v. Bikramjit Singh & Ors.

14 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3945
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

Delhi High Court held that jurisdiction under Article 227 lies with the High Court where the cause of action arises and allowed withdrawal of petition with liberty to file in the correct jurisdiction.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Article 227 Constitution of India jurisdiction National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission cause of action

M/S TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED v. ANANT BIR SINGH & ORS

14 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3943

Delhi High Court held it lacks jurisdiction under Article 227 to entertain a petition against NCDRC orders when the cause of action arose outside Delhi, permitting withdrawal with liberty to approach the correct High Court.

civil petition_allowed Significant Article 227 jurisdiction National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission cause of action