Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Gur Amritpal Singh Multani v. Mahesh Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the motor accident claim appeal as withdrawn following an amicable settlement between the vehicle owner appellant and the respondents.
Sachin Dahiya & Anr v. Union of India
The High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the deceased was not a bona fide passenger and that his death by being run over while crossing railway tracks did not amount to an untoward incident under the Railways Act, thus no compensation was payable.
Rajat Pillai & Anr. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC on the basis of a valid settlement and mutual divorce, emphasizing the court's power to prevent abuse of process through amicable dispute resolution.
Raghav Mittal v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the accused's second interim bail application on medical grounds for seizure treatment, emphasizing the seriousness of charges and directing timely medical care within custody.
Sudhir Dhaka v. NTPC Ltd & Ors.
An employee acquitted in criminal proceedings is entitled to full pay, leave encashment, and ex-gratia for suspension period treated as duty, but not to allowances or promotions contingent on active service.
Gaurav Narula & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute after the parties reached a full and final compromise and mutual consent divorce.
Sumit Kumar and Ors v. State Through SHO PS Maidan Garhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC on the ground of a voluntary compromise and full settlement between the parties in a matrimonial dispute.
Jatin Bhola & Ors. v. The State (N.C.T. of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC on the ground of compromise and mutual settlement between parties in a matrimonial dispute.
Atul Singh and Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act on the ground of compromise and full settlement between parties in a matrimonial dispute.
NXXXX XXXXX v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking directions for further investigation, holding that the Investigating Officer's decision to issue notice instead of arrest was lawful and no interference was warranted.
Hukum Chand @ Monu v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed interim bail sought for medical treatment of piles in a murder case, holding that the ailment was not serious and appropriate treatment was already provided in custody.
Deepak Tyagi v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a dacoity case on the principle of parity with a co-accused, considering his lesser involvement and procedural irregularities in arrest.
Pluto Travels India Private Limited v. PTW Holidays Private Limited
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining defendant from using the deceptively similar mark "PLUTO TOURS" infringing plaintiff's registered trademark "PLUTO" in travel services.
Sushila Devi Mittal & Amit Mittal v. Shikha Garg
The Delhi High Court quashed domestic violence proceedings against the brother-in-law due to lack of specific allegations and held that general claims without material cannot sustain such complaints under the DV Act.
Anique Abdullah v. Mahenoor @ Eirum
The Delhi High Court modified the interim maintenance payable by the husband under the Domestic Violence Act, reducing it to Rs.20,000 per month after considering the parties' income, property, and children's educational expenses.
Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd v. Indorbit Pharmaceuticals P. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that a decree under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC cannot be granted merely due to defendants' default without the plaintiff proving prior adoption and use of the trade dress, and thus refused to pass a decree without trial in a passing off and copyright infringement suit.
Mankind Pharma Limited v. Zhejiang Yige Enterprise Management Group Co. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal of Mankind Pharma, holding that the mark 'FLORASIS' is deceptively similar to the prior registered trademark 'FLORA' and directed removal of 'FLORASIS' from the trademark register.
Romil Gupta Trading as Sohan Lal Gupta v. Registrar of Trade Marks & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of a trademark registration due to the Registrar's failure to give mandatory one month's notice and held that correcting a clerical error without substantial alteration is permissible under the Trade Marks Rules.
Anil Kumar and Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a 2013 FIR under Sections 328, 506, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between parties, emphasizing the Court's power under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to end criminal proceedings where continuation would be unjust.
Sanjeev Kumar & Ors. v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a genuine and voluntary settlement between matrimonial parties, emphasizing the role of mediation and abuse of process doctrine.