Delhi High Court

35,876 judgments

Year:

Pritam Singh v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

13 May 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:3657
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that under the Senior Citizen Act and Rules, a senior citizen can seek eviction of children or legal heirs from property without proving ill-treatment or residing in the property, emphasizing the welfare and protection of senior citizens over title disputes.

family appeal_allowed Significant Senior Citizen Act Delhi Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Rules eviction ill-treatment

Sunny Kant v. The State NCT of Delhi

13 May 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:3626

The Delhi High Court held that Section 377 IPC cannot be applied to criminalize oral sex between husband and wife absent an allegation of non-consent, setting aside the charge framed against the petitioner.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 377 IPC Section 375 IPC marital rape consent

Gautam Walia v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi 12 & Anr.

13 May 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:3941-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a rectification order enhancing income tax liability and remanded the matter for reconsideration, emphasizing that repeated rectifications without proper procedure are impermissible.

tax other Significant Section 154 Income Tax Act rectification order Section 143(1)(a) intimation opportunity of hearing

AXIS FINANCE LIMITED v. CHUKKA KAVITHA

13 May 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:4017
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that judicial scrutiny at this stage is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and does not extend to merits of the dispute.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 appointment of arbitrator scope of judicial scrutiny arbitration agreement

Tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

13 May 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:3650

The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner cannot retain Late Payment Surcharge collected on electricity tax and must refund it to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi, as such surcharge falls under municipal law and not under electricity tariff regulations.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Late Payment Surcharge Electricity Tax Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 DMC E-Tax Bye-Laws, 1962

Sudhisha Dubey v. Union of India and Ors.

13 May 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:3950-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the widow of a deceased Coast Guard officer was entitled to Extraordinary Pension as his death from cardiac arrest was attributable to service, and the denial without reasons was unsustainable.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Extraordinary Pension Attributability to service Coast Guard Orders Central Civil Services (Extraordinary Pension) Rules, 1939

Narender Kumar Jain v. Pawan Kumar Jain

13 May 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:3974

The High Court held that findings dismissing applications under Order VII Rule 11 CPC are prima facie and not final, allowing the petitioner to raise defenses fully at trial.

civil appeal_allowed Order VII Rule 11 CPC Section 115 CPC prima facie findings rejection of plaint

KK Trading Co v. Avato Ward 77 State Goods and Service Tax & Ors.

13 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3967-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a GST adjudication order passed without hearing, allowing the petitioner to file a reply and be heard, while leaving the validity of related GST notifications to the Supreme Court.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Section 73 CGST Act Section 168A CGST Act Show Cause Notice Non-speaking order

PNB Housing Finance Ltd v. G.K. Naidu Trust & Ors.

13 May 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:3660
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from loan agreements containing a valid arbitration clause, despite respondents' non-cooperation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(5) Arbitral tribunal constitution Loan agreement dispute

Oravel Stays Private Limited v. Zostel Hospitality Private Limited

13 May 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:3661

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding a non-binding term sheet to be a binding contract by conduct, affirming the tribunal's jurisdiction and granting specific performance against the petitioner.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Term Sheet binding nature Specific performance Jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal

Joginder Kumar Goyal & Anr. v. BSES Rajdhani Power Limited & Anr.

13 May 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:3652

The Delhi High Court held that a basement used for domestic storage as part of a residential property must be classified under the domestic electricity category, quashing the respondents' arbitrary non-domestic classification.

administrative petition_allowed Significant electricity connection classification domestic category non-domestic category basement usage

PUERTO LIFE SCIENCES PVT. LTD. v. ANCON INFRATECH

13 May 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:3655

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award correcting retention money omission but set aside an unsupported loss of profit claim, affirming limited judicial interference under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 33 correction Section 34 challenge loss of profit claim

Elecon Engineering Company Limited v. Bhartiya Rail Bijlee Company Limited

13 May 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:3654

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking appointment of an arbitrator against a non-signatory party due to absence of a valid arbitration agreement binding that party.

arbitration petition_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement non-signatory Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Tripartite Agreement

Religare Finvest Limited v. Surya Silk Mills & Ors.

13 May 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:3662
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed fresh invocation of arbitration under loan agreements despite prior terminated arbitration, holding unilateral arbitrator appointment invalid and leaving maintainability issues to the arbitral tribunal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 29A unilateral appointment of arbitrator

Indu v. Pankaj Malhotra

13 May 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:3964

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's maintenance order for the minor son, affirming the assessment of the Respondent's income and rejecting claims for enhancement or reduction of maintenance.

family appeal_dismissed Significant maintenance Section 125 Cr.P.C. family court income assessment

Yogeshwar Dayal v. The Vishnu Urban Cooperative Thrift Credit Society Ltd

13 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3764-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the joint and several liability of sureties under Section 128 of the Indian Contract Act in cooperative society loan recovery proceedings, granting interim relief against salary attachment subject to deposit.

civil petition_dismissed Significant surety liability Section 128 Indian Contract Act cooperative society loan recovery joint and several liability

XXX v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

13 May 2025 · Dr. Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:3632

The Delhi High Court set aside the Trial Court’s discharge of the accused under Section 304 IPC, directing reconsideration of charges after holistic evaluation of oral and scientific evidence, while upholding discharge under the IT Act.

criminal remanded Significant charge framing post-mortem report unprescribed medicines Section 304 IPC

Union of India v. M/S Roshan Real Estate Pvt. Ltd.

13 May 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:3621-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award on dewatering charges but set aside the award on arbitration costs for patent illegality, reaffirming the limited scope of judicial interference under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 37 patent illegality

ICICI Bank v. Major (Retd) Jaideep Singh & Anr

13 May 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:3656

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award directing a bank to update credit information supplied to a credit information company with details of pending disputes affecting the borrower's creditworthiness, holding such disputes arbitrable under Section 18 of CICRA, 2005.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Credit Information Companies (Regulation) Act, 2005 Section 18 CICRA Arbitrability Credit Information

Tirupati Constwell Private Limited v. Delhi States Employees Federation CGHS Ltd

13 May 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:3649
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for appointment of arbitrator as barred by limitation, holding that no bona fide negotiations or mediation occurred to exclude any period from limitation under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Limitation Bona fide negotiations