Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Bhushan Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., holding that a prima facie case under Sections 419 and 420 IPC existed against the petitioner, warranting framing of charges.
Varun Nagpal & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed multiple FIRs arising from matrimonial disputes under Section 482 Cr.P.C. following an amicable settlement between the parties, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Viceroy Engineering v. Smiths Detection Veecon Systems Private Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging condonation of delay in filing an arbitration petition, affirming the limited scope of review jurisdiction and the sufficiency of explanations for delay.
Ajey Kumar Mishra v. Sangeeta Mishra & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court’s interim maintenance order assessing the petitioner’s income at Rs.70,000 per month based on evidence, allowing modification on changed circumstances.
Dr Namit Gupta v. Delhi Medical Council and Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the mandatory registration requirement with the Delhi Medical Council for medical practitioners practicing in Delhi, affirming the regulatory framework under the National Medical Commission Act, 2019.
Din Bandhu Dass v. Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld increased financial eligibility criteria in an IIT Delhi canteen tender, dismissing the petition for lack of arbitrariness or mala fide and emphasizing judicial restraint in tender matters.
Shirsat Umesh Madan & Ors. v. Indian Coast Guard & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging rejection from the Indian Coast Guard recruitment Stage-II exam due to late reporting and non-compliance with procedural instructions.
Salmuddin Saifi v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed regular monitoring and possible transfer of investigation in a missing minor child case, while disposing of the writ petition seeking immediate production of the child.
Shyam Sundar v. State (NCT) of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed the revision petition and set aside the conviction under Section 138 NI Act based on an amicable settlement between the parties, acquitting the petitioner and waiving costs.
Bhupender Mudgal @ Bhupender Sharma v. The State NCT Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 308 IPC based on an amicable settlement between husband and wife, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Central University of Jharkhand v. M/S. King Furnishing and Safe Co.
The Delhi High Court held that failure to make the mandatory 75% pre-deposit under Section 19 of the MSMED Act at the time of filing a Section 34 petition does not bar filing but the petition will not be entertained without the deposit.
Parijat Saurabh v. Kavita Srivastava
The Delhi High Court allowed the husband's appeal and granted divorce on the ground of mental cruelty by the wife under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, setting aside the Family Court's dismissal.
Shashvat Nakrani v. Ashneer Grover
The Delhi High Court disposed of a commercial appeal by directing fast track trial with appointment of a Court Commissioner to record evidence, leaving substantive issues open.
Samim Akhtar v. The State and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Habeas Corpus petition seeking production of a missing minor girl, directing continued police investigation and monitoring through status reports.
Vishakha & Anr. v. The Controller of Examination Central Board of Secondary Education & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the mandatory requirement of submitting a domicile certificate for female private candidates to appear in CBSE Board exams, rejecting Aadhaar as a substitute and dismissing the appeal for non-compliance.
Sunita Sharma and Ors. v. The Delhi State Cooperative Bank Ltd. and Anr.
The Delhi State Cooperative Bank Limited is not a 'State' under Article 12 and thus writ petitions challenging its service disciplinary actions are not maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution.
SKS College of Education v. National Council for Teacher Education
The Delhi High Court quashed the NCTE Northern Regional Committee's decision as it was based on a government letter already quashed by the Punjab & Haryana High Court, thereby invalidating the impugned decision.
Star Catalyst v. Commissioner of Delhi Value Added Tax
The Delhi High Court directed the tax authorities to process and pay the petitioner’s admissible VAT refund with statutory interest within four weeks or communicate reasons for denial.
M/S JAI SHRI BANKE BIHARI TRADERS v. UNION OF INDIA
The court held that provisional attachment orders under Section 83 of the CGST Act are valid for one year only, and while the challenged order had expired, the petitioner may challenge any fresh attachment order separately.
Babu Khan v. Zabuddin & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court’s refusal to admit a belatedly produced registered Will in a partition suit, emphasizing due diligence and Muslim law limitations on testamentary bequests.