Delhi High Court

71,673 judgments

Year:

M/S.KAMDHENU LTD v. M/S.RAGHUVEER METALINDUSTRIES LTD

20 Jun 2016 · G. S. Sistani J · 2016:DHC:8619

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s application to appoint Local Commissioners for inspection and seizure of infringing goods bearing the trademark 'KAMDHENU', holding that refusal on grounds of non-disclosure was erroneous when addresses and invoices were on record.

civil petition_allowed Significant Trademark infringement Passing off Local Commissioner Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC

Sunita Bharti v. Commandent of Army Hospital (R&R)

20 Jun 2016 · G. S. Sistani · 2016:DHC:4770

The Delhi High Court held that eviction and deprivation of amenities from licensee shops in public premises must follow due process under the Public Premises Eviction Act, and stayed electricity disconnection pending proper legal proceedings.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 Licence Deed Eviction proceedings Estate Officer

Atul Tripathi & Ors. v. Sanjay Bansal

20 Jun 2016 · G. S. Sistani · 2016:DHC:9042

The Delhi High Court held that a trial court must first decide an application for cancellation of non-bailable warrants under Section 70(2) CrPC without insisting on the accused's presence and stay coercive action pending such decision.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant non-bailable warrants Section 70(2) CrPC Section 482 CrPC Article 227 Constitution

GREEN POWER INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD v. TRIVENI ENGINEERING & INDUSTRIES LTD.

17 Jun 2016 · Manmohan Singh · 2016:DHC:4764

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act for lack of territorial jurisdiction due to an exclusive jurisdiction clause conferring jurisdiction on Noida Courts.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant exclusive jurisdiction arbitration and conciliation act 1996 section 37 appeal territorial jurisdiction

SHREE RANI SATI SALES PVT. LTD v. HAMDARD LABORATORIES INDIA

17 Jun 2016 · Manmohan Singh · 2016:DHC:4763

The Delhi High Court held that fresh petitions challenging termination of a contract are maintainable despite earlier withdrawal, where a fresh cause of action arises, and interim status quo must be maintained pending adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed Significant res judicata termination notice C & F Agreement interim injunction

SHREE RANI SATI SALES PVT. LTD v. HAMDARD LABORATORIES INDIA

17 Jun 2016 · Manmohan Singh · 2016:DHC:4765

The Delhi High Court held that fresh petitions based on new cause of action are maintainable despite earlier withdrawal of similar petitions and granted interim relief maintaining status quo against illegal termination of a contractual agreement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant res judicata fresh cause of action interim injunction status quo

M/S NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA v. M/S PROGRESSIVE-MVR (JV)

17 Jun 2016 · Manmohan Singh · 2016:DHC:4767
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld arbitral awards interpreting price adjustment clauses to use current market costs rather than base costs, dismissing NHAI's challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Price adjustment clause Contract interpretation

JMC Projects (India) Ltd. & Anr v. MRT Signals Ltd.

17 Jun 2016 · Manmohan Singh · 2016:DHC:4762

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for appointment of a substitute sole Arbitrator under Section 15(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, appointing Justice V.K. Shali to adjudicate disputes arising from the MoUs dated 14th October 2014.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 15(2) Substitute Arbitrator Arbitration Agreement

SMS AAMW Tollways Private Limited v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation

17 Jun 2016 · Manmohan Singh · 2016:DHC:4768

The Delhi High Court held that Clause 16 of the Bilateral Agreement constitutes a valid arbitration agreement and appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, despite the respondent's failure to appoint one.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arbitration agreement Clause 16 Bilateral Agreement State Support Agreement

M/S NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA v. M/S PROGRESSIVE-MVR (JV)

17 Jun 2016 · Manmohan Singh · 2016:DHC:4766
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court upheld arbitral awards interpreting price adjustment clause to use current costs for calculating material percentages, dismissing NHAI's challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitral Award Price Adjustment Clause Contract Interpretation Current Cost

Kamla & Anr v. State (NCT of Delhi)

17 Jun 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:9229

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioners' revision challenging the trial court's refusal to produce case property and alter charges under the NDPS Act, holding that the trial court acted within its discretion and the petitioners' applications were dilatory.

criminal appeal_dismissed NDPS Act ganja commercial quantity alteration of charge

Major Anamdeep Singh Dhingra v. Union of India & Ors.

16 Jun 2016 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2016:DHC:5190-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s writ petition, quashing his posting orders and directing his posting in NCR to enable him to support his wife undergoing critical assisted reproductive treatment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant posting orders Assisted Reproductive Technology Polycystic Ovarian Disease intrauterine insemination

Union of India & Anr v. Shri R K Nim

15 Jun 2016 · C. Hari Shankar; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:8582-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 10

The Delhi High Court upheld the quashing of disciplinary proceedings against a government servant for lack of approval of the chargesheet by the Disciplinary Authority, reaffirming the distinct and mandatory requirement of such approval under Rule 14 CCS (CCA) Rules and Article 311 of the Constitution.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant disciplinary proceedings chargesheet approval Rule 14 CCS (CCA) Rules Article 311 Constitution

R K Aggarwal v. Brig Madan Lal Nassa

13 Jun 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:4758

The Delhi High Court held that in summons cases under Chapter XX Cr.P.C., non-service of notice under Section 251 Cr.P.C. does not vitiate trial if accused are represented, and there is no provision for discharge, dismissing petitions seeking quashing of defamation complaint proceedings.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 482 Cr.P.C. Section 251 Cr.P.C. summons case discharge of accused

Pratap Singh Saingar & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

13 Jun 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:4759

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 406 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act on the basis of an amicable compromise between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR Dowry Prohibition Act Section 406 IPC

Shalainder Upadhyay v. Govt of NCT Delhi

13 Jun 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:4760

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s anticipatory bail application in a rape and criminal intimidation case involving alleged blackmail with obscene videos, emphasizing the gravity of allegations and need for custodial investigation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC rape criminal intimidation

State v. Hargyan

13 Jun 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:4747

The Delhi High Court upheld bail granted under Section 167(2) Cr. P.C., ruling that an incomplete charge sheet returned for further investigation cannot deny the accused's statutory right to bail.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant statutory bail Section 167(2) Cr. P.C. charge sheet incomplete investigation

Surrender Kumar Mehra v. State & Anr.

13 Jun 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:4756

The High Court upheld the conviction under Section 138 NI Act but set aside the appellate enhancement of sentence and compensation due to lack of appeal by the complainant.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Cheque dishonour Revisional jurisdiction Concurrent findings of fact

M/S STANDARD FIREWORKS PVT.LTD. v. THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

13 Jun 2016 · P.S. Teji · 2016:DHC:4757

The Delhi High Court upheld the summoning order against Standard Fireworks Pvt. Ltd. for failing to mention a mandatory customer care number on product packaging, dismissing the petition to quash criminal proceedings under the Legal Metrology Act.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Legal Metrology Act 2009 Section 18(1) Section 36(1) Rule 6(2) Legal Metrology Rules 2011

Sunair Hotels Ltd. v. Union of India, Ministry of Corporate Affairs & Anr.

13 Jun 2016 · Manmohan Singh · 2016:DHC:4746

The Delhi High Court refused to stay a corporate investigation under Section 212(c) of the Companies Act, 2013 but restrained coercive action pending further hearing.

corporate appeal_dismissed Companies Act 2013 Section 212(c) investigation writ petition