Delhi High Court

71,673 judgments

Year:

Neha Aggarwal v. PNB Housing Finance Ltd

07 Jul 2016 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2016:DHC:4785

The Delhi High Court upheld the bar on civil court jurisdiction over disputes involving recovery of debts secured by mortgage under the SARFAESI Act, holding that such matters fall exclusively within the Debt Recovery Tribunal's jurisdiction except in narrow cases of fraudulent enforcement.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant SARFAESI Act Debt Recovery Tribunal civil court jurisdiction equitable mortgage

Sri Guru Singh Sabha v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation

07 Jul 2016 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2016:DHC:4778

The Delhi High Court held that the MCD/SDMC lawfully modified the layout plan to change land use from a school to residential and community facilities, dismissing residents' petitions challenging the change.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant layout plan modification Section 313 Delhi Municipal Corporation Act public purpose reservation land use change

Dr. V.K. Agrawal v. University of Delhi

07 Jul 2016 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2016:DHC:4777

The Delhi High Court upheld the Vice-Chancellor's interpretation that a person cannot serve more than two terms cumulatively under categories (x) or (xi) of the University Executive Council, dismissing the petition challenging disqualification.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Executive Council University of Delhi Statute 5(2) term limits

New Delhi Municipal Council v. Jaswinder Rai

07 Jul 2016 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2016:DHC:4775

The Delhi High Court held that NDMC's Resolution allowing reassessment of rateable value for self-occupied residential properties after letting applies irrespective of timing of letting, and rateable value must be fixed as per NDMC Act provisions, dismissing NDMC's challenge.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant rateable value self-occupied property NDMC Resolution No.12(Q-5) property tax assessment

Common Cause v. Bahujan Samaj Party

07 Jul 2016 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2016:DHC:4774

The Delhi High Court held that the Election Commission lacks power to freeze or withdraw a reserved election symbol outside prescribed grounds but must issue guidelines to prevent misuse of public funds by ruling parties for propagating their symbols.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Election Commission of India reserved election symbol freezing symbol Model Code of Conduct

M/S. MASAURHI SERVICE STATION v. BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. & ANR.

07 Jul 2016 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2016:DHC:4783

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging BPCL’s cancellation of the petitioner’s retail outlet resitement from Shanti Path to Azadpur, holding the resitement violated MoPNG policy and no vested right was created.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant resitement retail outlet dealership BPCL MoPNG guidelines

Aero Club of India v. Union of India

07 Jul 2016 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2016:DHC:4781

The Delhi High Court held that the Ministry of Civil Aviation's letter was not a binding policy direction under Section 40 of the AAI Act, allowing the Airport Authority of India to enforce enhanced licence fees and eviction notices against the petitioners.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Airport Authority of India Act, 1994 Section 40 directions Ministry of Civil Aviation licence fee

Madhvi Singh & Ors. v. Pavik Lifestyle Ltd.

07 Jul 2016 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2016:DHC:4784

The Delhi High Court allowed the landlord's appeal, holding that a suit for ejectment and mesne profits against a tenant admitted for the suit is maintainable despite initial denial of tenancy, and dismissed the trial court's finding of no landlord-tenant relationship with the respondent.

civil appeal_allowed Significant landlord-tenant relationship termination of tenancy mesne profits Transfer of Property Act Section 106

Raghav Buildcon Private Limited v. Union of India

07 Jul 2016 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2016:DHC:4776
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging alleged wrongful bank debits, holding that such contractual and monetary disputes are not maintainable under Article 226 where alternative remedies under specialized recovery laws exist.

civil petition_dismissed Significant writ jurisdiction Article 226 Debt Recovery Tribunal SARFAESI Act

Surajit Nundy & Ors. v. Management of Mirambika Free Progress School & Ors.

07 Jul 2016 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2016:DHC:4779

The Delhi High Court held that shifting a school within the same locality does not require prior approval under Rule 55 of the Delhi School Education Rules, and such shifting does not invalidate the school's recognition.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Delhi School Education Act, 1973 Rule 55 Delhi School Education Rules school shifting locality definition

Grover, Mr.Nikhil Sharda, Ms.Padma Priya, Ms.Ratna A., Advs v. JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY

05 Jul 2016 · HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO; V. KAMESWAR RAO, J · 2017:DHC:1547

The Delhi High Court held that the UGC Regulations, 2016 are mandatory and binding on Jawaharlal Nehru University by operation of law, and procedural irregularities in their adoption do not invalidate the Admission Policy based thereon.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant UGC Regulations 2016 Jawaharlal Nehru University Act 1966 University Grants Commission Act 1956 mandatory regulations

M/S COMPUTER KIDS PVT. LTD. v. SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

04 Jul 2016 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2016:DHC:8966 SC

The Delhi High Court held that a municipal notice under Section 345-A requires a hearing and reasoned order before sealing premises, directing the SDMC to hear the petitioner and stay sealing pending decision.

administrative other Significant Section 345-A Delhi Municipal Corporation Act Master Plan for Delhi-2021 misuse of premises coaching center

Jatindra Kumar Pradhan v. Union of India

04 Jul 2016 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2017:DHC:8171-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of writ petitions as infructuous after the respondents granted outliving permission and directed payment of House Rent Allowance to CISF couples denied family accommodation.

administrative petition_allowed outliving permission CISF family accommodation House Rent Allowance

Vinop v. Ranjeetsingh

01 Jul 2016 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2016:DHC:8620

The Delhi High Court directed the respondent to maintain status quo on possession pending the Rent Control Tribunal's decision on stay applications filed by petitioners against decrees under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.

property petition_dismissed Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(a) Section 14(1)(e) Rent Control Tribunal

B.K. College v. National Council for Teacher Education

01 Jul 2016 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:3370

The Delhi High Court set aside the withdrawal of recognition of a teacher education institution for procedural lapses and directed fresh inspection and due process before any adverse action.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant NCTE recognition withdrawal Teacher Education Institution shifting premises Section 17(1) NCTE Act show cause notice

TOSHIBA INDIA PVT LTD v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

24 Jun 2016 · S. Muralidhar; I. S. Mehta · 2019:DHC:7396-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Delhi High Court held that interest paid on customs duty is deductible only in the year of actual payment under Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, allowing deduction in AY 2016-17 but not in earlier years.

tax appeal_allowed Income Tax Appellate Tribunal customs duty interest deduction Section 43B Income Tax Act assessment year

Krishan Kumar Sood v. CBI

20 Jun 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:9011

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s refusal to recall a witness for further cross-examination on new facts emerging during another accused’s cross-examination, clarifying the limited scope of Section 311 Cr.P.C. to prevent endless trials.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 311 Cr.P.C. recall of witness cross-examination fair trial

N.S. Kapur and Ors. v. S G T B Khalsa College and Ors.

20 Jun 2016 · G.S. Sistani · 2016:DHC:4769

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioners' applications seeking continuation of interim relief against the minority status of Khalsa College, holding that no interim relief can continue without proper application and that the University of Delhi's withdrawal of its petitions amounted to acceptance of the minority status.

administrative petition_dismissed Minority Educational Institution interim relief reservation Scheduled Castes

Rusan Pharma Ltd. v. Union of India & Anr

20 Jun 2016 · G. S. Sistani; P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:4771-DB

The Delhi High Court held that an emergency procurement outside an expired tender is not bound by the tender’s terms on awarding contracts to the next lowest bidder, and upheld the procurement order placed on the third lowest bidder.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant tender process procurement bid validity emergency purchase

State v. Bina Ramani

20 Jun 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:4772

The Delhi High Court upheld the discharge of the accused from forgery-related offences on the ground of limitation under Section 468 Cr.P.C., dismissing the State's petition challenging the discharge.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 468 Cr.P.C. limitation period forgery Section 471 IPC