Delhi High Court

71,673 judgments

Year:

Salim Khan v. State of NCT of Delhi

08 Jul 2016 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2016:DHC:4794-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against acquittal in a murder case, holding that the child witness's testimony was unreliable and the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant child witness testimony Section 302 IPC Section 120-B IPC criminal conspiracy

Anil Kapoor v. Ved Prakash Sehgal and Others

08 Jul 2016 · G. S. Sistani · 2016:DHC:4795

The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for specific performance as barred by limitation, holding that the limitation period commenced from the last agreed date of performance which expired well before suit filing.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance limitation Article 54 Limitation Act agreement to sell

Sajjad Khan v. Union of India

08 Jul 2016 · G.S. Sistani; I.S. Mehta · 2016:DHC:4796-DB

The Delhi High Court directed respondents to reconsider NFU benefit claims of AFHQCS members individually under the DoP&T OM dated 24.04.2009, setting aside adverse Tribunal observations without deciding entitlement on merits.

administrative other Non-Functional Upgradation Armed Forces Headquarters Civil Service Organized Group A service Department of Personnel and Training

Deepak Kumar & Ors v. Union of India & Ors

08 Jul 2016 · G.S. Sistani; I.S. Mehta · 2016:DHC:4797-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld that an interim order can stand vacated due to non-prosecution, directed the Tribunal to expeditiously decide the matter, and continued interim protection pending disposal.

administrative other deputation interim order Central Administrative Tribunal automatic vacation

M/s. J B Overseas v. Union of India & Ors.

08 Jul 2016 · S. Muralidhar; Ashutosh Kumar · 230 (2016) DLT 38
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that Customs cannot require an importer to furnish a bank guarantee for 50% of provisional duty without reasons and directed release of gold jewellery consignments upon furnishing prescribed bond and deposit.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Customs (Provisional Duty Assessment) Regulations, 2011 provisional release bank guarantee customs duty differential

T. Ramesh v. State

08 Jul 2016 · Sunita Gupta · 2016:DHC:4787

The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for robbery causing grievous hurt under Sections 394/397 IPC, clarifying that grievous hurt during robbery triggers mandatory minimum sentencing under Section 397 IPC and sentences under Sections 394 and 397 must run concurrently.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 397 IPC grievous hurt robbery dacoity

Shashi Bala v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

08 Jul 2016 · Sunita Gupta · 2016:DHC:4788

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order directing the prosecution to furnish all investigation documents and statements to the accused under Section 207 Cr.P.C., emphasizing the accused's right to fair disclosure for a fair trial.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 207 CrPC Section 173 CrPC disclosure of documents fair trial

Shiv Chand Rao v. Union of India and Ors.

08 Jul 2016 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2016:DHC:4789-DB

The Delhi High Court held that failure of the department to send an employee for a pre-promotional course cannot prejudice his entitlement to ACP financial upgradation, which must be reckoned from initial appointment date, and directed grant of benefits with arrears.

service_law petition_allowed Significant Assured Career Progression Scheme financial upgradation pre-promotional course service period reckoning

The Atlas Electric Industries Pvt Ltd & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr

08 Jul 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:4815

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the compounding of a cheque bounce offence under Section 138 NI Act, holding the settlement was voluntary and not vitiated by coercion.

criminal petition_dismissed Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 NI Act Compounding of offence Section 147 NI Act

H.S. Atri v. UOI and Anr

08 Jul 2016 · A.K. Pathak · 2016:DHC:4813

Ravindra Singh v. UOI and Anr

08 Jul 2016 · A.K. Pathak · 2016:DHC:4814

The Delhi High Court upheld eviction orders against ex-servicemen licensees who overstayed their shops beyond license expiry under the valid 2007 SOP, affirming no indefeasible right to possession post-license.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant licensee rights public premises eviction Standing Operative Procedure Delhi Cantt shopping complex

National Highways Authority of India v. MBL Infrastructure Limited

08 Jul 2016 · Manmohan Singh · 2016:DHC:4810

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award, dismissing the petition challenging contract termination and certain claims, emphasizing limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Contract termination Arbitral award

Sharda Devi Sanskrit Vidyapeeth v. Director of Education & Anr

08 Jul 2016 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sunita Gupta · 2016:DHC:4811-DB

The Delhi High Court held that suspension without Director's approval lapses after 15 days, entitling the employee to full salary for that period, while belated approval validates suspension only from the approval date, allowing subsistence allowance thereafter.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant suspension Delhi School Education Act, 1973 approval of suspension salary during suspension

M/S L.G ELECTRONICS INDIA(P) LTD v. DINESH KALRA

08 Jul 2016 · Manmohan Singh, J. · 2016:DHC:4808
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award allowing claims under a distributorship agreement extended by conduct and documents beyond colour televisions, dismissing the petitioner's challenge on jurisdiction and limitation grounds.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 7 arbitration agreement Section 34 challenge Distributorship Agreement

State v. Ache Lal

08 Jul 2016 · S.P. Garg · 2016:DHC:4809

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal against acquittal in a rape case, upholding that inconsistencies and lack of corroboration in the prosecutrix's testimony warranted benefit of doubt to the accused.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant sexual assault rape prosecutrix testimony acquittal

Seema Sehgal v. Pawan Goyal & Anr.

08 Jul 2016 · S.P. Garg · 2016:DHC:4807

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the summoning order under Section 323 IPC, holding that the evidence did not prima facie disclose offences under Section 376(D) IPC and that the delay and inconsistencies justified refusal of further investigation or trial.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 376(D) IPC summoning order Section 482 Cr.P.C. delay in complaint

M/S NHAI NEW DELHI v. M/S BEL-TBL (JOINT VENTURE)

08 Jul 2016 · Manmohan Singh, J. · 2016:DHC:4812

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award granting additional costs to the contractor for delays attributable to the employer, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Extension of time Additional cost

CITICORP INTERNATIONAL LTD v. SHIV-VANI OIL & GAS EXPLORATION

08 Jul 2016 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2016:DHC:4793

The Delhi High Court held that rigs owned by subsidiaries are distinct from the judgment debtor's assets and cannot be restrained or executed against without proper jurisdiction and valid grounds to lift the corporate veil.

civil appeal_allowed Significant execution proceedings subsidiary company corporate veil separate legal entity

Hanuman Road Residents Welfare Association v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

07 Jul 2016 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2016:DHC:4782

The Delhi High Court upheld NDMC's lawful construction of an electric sub-station in a public park, ruling that judicial interference in municipal infrastructure decisions is limited absent illegality or mala fide.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant electric sub-station public park Master Plan for Delhi public utilities

Azad Singh Solanki v. Punjab National Bank

07 Jul 2016 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2016:DHC:4780

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging forfeiture of earnest money in a SARFAESI Act auction, holding that such disputes involve factual questions and contractual matters not amenable to writ jurisdiction and must be resolved through civil remedies.

civil petition_dismissed Significant SARFAESI Act earnest money forfeiture writ jurisdiction Article 226