Delhi High Court

71,673 judgments

Year:

NTPC v. Larsen & Toubro Limited

03 Jun 2016 · Manmohan Singh · 2016:DHC:4712

The Delhi High Court disposed of arbitration appeals between NTPC and Larsen & Toubro by approving parties' settlement on interim measures including bank guarantees and hire charges, upholding the Arbitral Tribunal's orders subject to agreed terms.

arbitration appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Interim orders Bank guarantees Hire charges

M/S. CHINA TRUST COMMERCIAL BANK v. LILLIPUT KIDSWEAR LTD.

03 Jun 2016 · Manmohan Singh, J. · 2016:DHC:4727

The Delhi High Court held that leased premises owned by a third party do not vest in a sick industrial company during liquidation and directed de-sealing and restoration of possession without requiring BIFR consent under Section 22 of SICA.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 Section 22 SICA de-sealing of property lease agreement

NTPC v. Larsen & Toubro Limited

03 Jun 2016 · Manmohan Singh, J. · 2016:DHC:4711

The Delhi High Court disposed of arbitration appeals between NTPC and Larsen & Toubro by approving agreed interim arrangements including bank guarantees, hire charges, and escrow deposits to facilitate ongoing arbitration proceedings.

arbitration appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Interim measures Bank guarantees Hire charges

Union of India & Anr. v. S.K. Gupta

03 Jun 2016 · Sanjiv Khanna; Najmi Waziri · 2016:DHC:4701-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that suspension does not automatically revoke upon retirement if judicial proceedings are pending, and pensionary benefits must be regulated as per applicable pension rules, setting aside the Tribunal's order granting full terminal benefits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant suspension superannuation pension provisional pension

Raj Pal Yadav v. Murli Projects Pvt. Ltd.

03 Jun 2016 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Deepa Sharma · 2016:DHC:4697-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld a 10-day imprisonment sentence for willful contempt by repeatedly breaching court undertakings and misleading the court, affirming that contempt and civil enforcement remedies are complementary.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant contempt of court breach of undertaking Order 39 Rule 2A CPC Section 14 Contempt of Courts Act

A.K. Rastogi v. Ministry of Corporate Affairs & Anr.

03 Jun 2016 · Hima Kohli · 2016:DHC:4723

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition as withdrawn, holding that the petitioner should seek relief before the Central Administrative Tribunal for administrative disputes involving government departments.

administrative petition_dismissed Central Administrative Tribunal writ petition maintainability Ministry of Corporate Affairs

Dharmender v. State

03 Jun 2016 · Sunita Gupta · 2016:DHC:4698

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and minimum sentence under Section 6 of the POCSO Act for sexual assault on a child, relying on consistent victim testimony corroborated by medical evidence and rejecting the appellant's plea of false implication.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant POCSO Act Section 6 POCSO sexual offence against child child victim testimony

Asif v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

03 Jun 2016 · S.P. Garg · 2016:DHC:4699

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of two appellants for robbery and related offences based on credible eyewitness testimony, medical evidence, and recovery of stolen property, dismissing their appeals.

criminal appeal_dismissed robbery voluntarily causing hurt identification recovery of stolen property

Sardar @ Ilyas v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

03 Jun 2016 · S.P. Garg · 2016:DHC:4682

The Delhi High Court disposed of the criminal appeal Crl.A.1035/2015 by referring to a detailed common judgment in a related case, without delivering a separate judgment.

criminal other Procedural criminal appeal disposal common judgment Delhi High Court

M/S. CHINA TRUST COMMERCIAL BANK v. LILLIPUT KIDSWEAR LTD.

03 Jun 2016 · Manmohan Singh, J. · 2016:DHC:4729

The Delhi High Court directed the Official Liquidator to hand over possession of leased premises to the landlord, affirming that claims for possession are independent of winding up proceedings and may be enforced through Court-appointed Local Commissioners.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Official Liquidator Lease Deed Possession Unauthorized Occupation

Anand Mehta & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

03 Jun 2016 · S. Muralidhar; Vibhu Bakhru · 2016:DHC:4681-DB

The Delhi High Court held that without formal acceptance of the bid by the competent authority, the highest bidder at a public auction has no vested right to confirmation of sale, and directed refund of earnest money with interest after rejecting the Petitioners' claim for transfer of property.

property petition_dismissed Significant public auction highest bidder earnest money formal acceptance

Mega Cabs Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.

03 Jun 2016 · S. Muralidhar; Vibhu Bakhru · 2016:DHC:4685-DB

The Delhi High Court struck down amended Rule 5A(2) of the Service Tax Rules and related circulars as ultra vires the Finance Act, holding that departmental officers and the CAG cannot demand audit of service tax assessees without statutory authority and safeguards.

tax petition_allowed Significant Service Tax Rules Finance Act, 1994 Rule 5A(2) Section 72A

Mohd Bilal Qureshi v. State

03 Jun 2016 · Sunita Gupta · 2016:DHC:4684
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant in a rape case due to unreliable prosecutrix testimony, unexplained delay in FIR, and lack of evidence negating consent.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant rape sole testimony prosecutrix consent

Datawind Innovations Private Limited v. Indus Mobile Distribution Private Limited

03 Jun 2016 · Manmohan Singh, J. · 2016:DHC:4720

Delhi High Court held it has jurisdiction to entertain arbitration-related petitions despite an exclusive Mumbai jurisdiction clause, appointed arbitrator, and granted interim injunction against respondents.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration territorial jurisdiction exclusive jurisdiction clause cause of action

Subodh v. State

03 Jun 2016 · Sunita Gupta · 2016:DHC:4683

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for kidnapping and raping a two-year-old child based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence and medical proof.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence sexual assault minor victim last seen evidence

Ranjeet Kumar v. The State

03 Jun 2016 · Sunil Gaur · 2016:DHC:4707

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for cheating under Section 420 IPC but set aside forgery convictions due to absence of original forged document, reducing sentence accordingly.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant cheating forgery No Objection Certificate Section 420 IPC

Daisy Panna and Ors. v. Union of India and Anr.

03 Jun 2016 · Hima Kohli · 2016:DHC:4724

The High Court dismissed the writ petition as not maintainable, directing the petitioners to seek relief before the Central Administrative Tribunal which has exclusive jurisdiction under Section 14 of the CAT Act, 1985.

administrative petition_dismissed Central Administrative Tribunal Section 14 jurisdiction writ petition

BCH Electric Limited v. Eaton Corporation

03 Jun 2016 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Vibhu Bakhru

The Delhi High Court upheld Eaton Corporation's prior ownership of the CUTLER-HAMMER trademarks, restraining BCH Electric Limited from unauthorized use and fraudulent registration, emphasizing that licensees cannot claim proprietary rights post-license expiry.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant trademark infringement licensee rights proprietary rights abandonment of trademark

Suresh Kumar Bansal v. Union of India

03 Jun 2016 · S. Muralidhar; Vibhu Bakhru
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that while Parliament can levy service tax on construction services, the absence of statutory machinery to segregate the service component in composite contracts renders the levy on amounts paid by flat buyers unsustainable.

tax petition_allowed Significant service tax construction of complex composite contract legislative competence

South India Club v. Land and Development Office

03 Jun 2016 · Vibhu Bakhru, J · 2016:DHC:4704

The court held that while the lessee is responsible for unauthorized constructions by its sub-lessee on leased premises, it cannot be compelled to remove encroachments by third parties on adjoining government land, directing reconsideration of permissions accordingly.

administrative petition_allowed Significant perpetual lease deed unauthorized construction encroachment No Objection Certificate