Delhi High Court

71,673 judgments

Year:

Lava International Limited v. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ)

14 Jul 2016 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Deepa Sharma · 2016:DHC:4928-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendant's appeal against an interlocutory order limiting its right to lead additional rebuttal evidence in a patent infringement suit, emphasizing adherence to trial schedules and procedural compliance.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant patent infringement rebuttal evidence witness disclosure trial schedule

Master Samar Gupta v. Gyan Bharati School

14 Jul 2016 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2016:DHC:4927

The Delhi High Court restored the admission of a minor under the EWS category despite allegations of a forged income certificate, emphasizing protection of the child's rights and allowing admission subject to a penalty.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Economically Weaker Section income certificate admission cancellation minor child

Yashika v. D.A.V. Public School

14 Jul 2016 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2016:DHC:4930

The Delhi High Court restored the admission of a minor under the EWS category after verifying the authenticity of the income certificate and held that minors should not be penalized for alleged parental misdeeds.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant admission cancellation Economically Weaker Section income certificate minor student rights

Master Saksham Kamat v. Ryan International School

14 Jul 2016 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2016:DHC:4929

The Delhi High Court restored the admission of a minor student under the EWS category after verifying a valid income certificate, emphasizing leniency towards minors and imposing a penalty on the parent.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Economically Weaker Section income certificate admission cancellation minor child

Tanush Gautam v. Bulebells School International

14 Jul 2016 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2016:DHC:4934

Delhi High Court restored admission of a minor under EWS category despite allegations of forged income certificate, emphasizing protection of minor’s educational rights and permitting change of residence post-admission.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Economically Weaker Section income certificate admission cancellation minor student rights

Rehan Saifi v. Manava Bharati India International School

14 Jul 2016 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2016:DHC:4933

The Delhi High Court restored the admission of a minor student under the EWS category after verifying the authenticity of the income certificate and directed a penalty deposit, emphasizing protection of the child's right to education despite allegations of forgery.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Economically Weaker Section income certificate admission cancellation minor child

Jevisa v. Delhi Public School

14 Jul 2016 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2016:DHC:4932

The Delhi High Court restored a minor student's admission cancelled on alleged forged income certificate grounds, emphasizing protection of the child's right to education upon verification of eligibility.

family petition_allowed Significant Economically Weaker Section Income Certificate Admission Cancellation Minor Child

Master Razwan Ali Tariq v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

14 Jul 2016 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2016:DHC:4931

The Delhi High Court held that an ST certificate issued by an approved authority outside Delhi is valid for admission without requiring endorsement by Delhi authorities, directing admission of the petitioner accordingly.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Scheduled Tribe certificate admission diploma course certificate verification

Master Piyush Yadav v. Delhi Public School & Ors.

14 Jul 2016 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2016:DHC:4925

The Delhi High Court held that a minor cannot be denied admission under the EWS category due to the parent's misrepresentation and directed the school to consider the child's fresh application based on a valid income certificate.

family appeal_allowed Significant Economically Weaker Section EWS category admission minor child admission income certificate

Mohan Lal & Ors. v. UOI & Ors.

14 Jul 2016 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2016:DHC:4926-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of prescribed minimum qualifying marks including a 40% benchmark in interviews for promotion from Sub-Inspector to Inspector, dismissing the challenge as arbitrary.

administrative petition_dismissed Standing Order No.8/99/1999 promotion criteria minimum qualifying marks interview assessment

Jyoti v. Life Insurance Corporation of India & Ors.

14 Jul 2016 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2016:DHC:4947

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging termination of contractual engagement under LIC's Financial Services Executive Scheme, holding no right to continuation or regularisation beyond the contract period as per Scheme terms and binding precedents.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Financial Services Executive Scheme 2007 contractual appointment regularisation Life Insurance Corporation of India

Chief Engg. Delhi Admn.Kash.G v. Delhi Flood Control Mazdoor Union

14 Jul 2016 · G.S. Sistani; I.S. Mehta · 2016:DHC:4948-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order granting CPWD-equivalent service benefits to Delhi Flood Control Department workers in absence of independent departmental rules.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Central Administrative Tribunal CPWD manual Delhi Flood Control Department service conditions

India Glycols Limited v. Standard Chartered Bank & Ors.

14 Jul 2016 · Hima Kohli · 2016:DHC:4945

The Delhi High Court disposed of a civil suit following an out of court settlement between the parties, allowing the plaintiff to withdraw the suit.

civil other out of court settlement withdrawal of suit disposal of suit civil procedure

Gurnam Kaur v. BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. & Ors.

14 Jul 2016 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2016:DHC:4951

The Delhi High Court granted a mandatory injunction directing removal of an unauthorized transformer and electric pole from the plaintiff's property, affirming her ownership and rejecting defendants' delay and lack of legal right to retain the installations.

civil appeal_allowed Significant mandatory injunction property ownership transformer removal encroachment

Sant Prakash Singh v. State

14 Jul 2016 · Mukta Gupta · 2016:DHC:4946

The High Court held that a Magistrate should not direct police to register an FIR under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. when the complainant possesses evidence and no police investigation is necessary, dismissing the petition seeking such direction.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. FIR registration Forgery Handwriting expert report

State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) v. Pawan Jindal and Ors.

14 Jul 2016 · Gita Mittal; R.K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:4949-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a double murder and robbery case due to failure of prosecution to prove charges beyond reasonable doubt, emphasizing the appellate court's limited scope to interfere with reasonable trial court findings.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant murder robbery criminal conspiracy last seen theory

State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) v. Pawan Jindal and Ors.

14 Jul 2016 · Gita Mittal; R.K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:4950-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's acquittal of accused in a double murder and robbery case, finding the prosecution evidence vague and insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant criminal conspiracy murder robbery last seen theory

Exxon Mobil Corporation & Anr v. Shailesh H Mehta & Anr

14 Jul 2016 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2016:DHC:4941

The Delhi High Court upheld interim injunction restraining defendants from using the deceptively similar trademark 'EXON' to plaintiffs' famous 'EXXON' mark, stayed suit pending rectification proceedings under the Trademarks Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Trademark infringement EXXON vs EXON Interim injunction Trade Marks Act 1999

Airports Authority of India v. ADM/LAC (South West) & Ors.

13 Jul 2016 · Indermeet Kaur · 2016:DHC:8951

The Delhi High Court held that only the ADM appointed as Nodal Officer has jurisdiction to decide the matter and directed the matter to be decided afresh within three months, setting aside the impugned order for lack of jurisdiction.

administrative appeal_allowed jurisdiction ADM Nodal Officer Airports Authority of India illegal order

Nand Kishore@Anand v. Naresh Kumar & Ors.

13 Jul 2016 · Manmohan, J · 2016:DHC:8636

The Delhi High Court dismissed multiple contempt petitions for lack of proof of wilful disobedience of its order, clarifying that no opinion was expressed on the merits of the underlying dispute.

civil petition_dismissed contempt of court wilful disobedience undertaking court order