Delhi High Court
71,673 judgments
Through: Nemo v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
The Delhi High Court deferred judicial review of parole guidelines, directing administrative review by a government committee and allowing petitioners to submit suggestions, with liberty to approach the Court again if unresolved.
Indiabulls Financial Services Ltd v. Chandradeep Singh Bhurji
The High Court held that an executing court cannot grant compensation beyond the decree and set aside the order awarding damages for lost documents in execution proceedings.
Dr. Sahadeva Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that disciplinary proceedings require separate approval by the disciplinary authority for initiation and framing of charges, quashing the charge-sheet issued without such approval.
Asia Huayu Metal Wire Mesh Products (P) Ltd v. Principal Commissioner of Customs & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed Customs to treat the DRI alert on two containers as lifted and proceed with assessment and clearance, granting relief to the importer facing undue delay.
Prime Time India Ltd. v. Ashok Kapoor and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld a compromise for specific performance of sale of property shares, rejecting belated challenges based on fraud and duress, applying res judicata principles.
Davinder Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that shares issued to the Central Government by a cooperative society prior to the 2002 Act were valid and that redemption of such shares requires byelaw provisions or agreement, dismissing the petitioner's challenge and claim for refund as premature.
PEC LIMITED v. ADM ASIA PACIFIC TRADING PTE LTD
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting demurrage to the respondent, affirming limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act and proper contractual interpretation by the arbitral tribunal.
Suresh Kumar Goyal v. Chief Commissioner Income Tax-2 & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an attachment under the SARFAESI Act has precedence over a subsequent Income Tax Department attachment, directing registration of the sale deed executed by the secured creditor.
Rajinder Mohan Malhotra v. Vice Chairman Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal upholding the authority of the Director (Commercial Lands), DDA, to impose damages for unauthorized occupation, applying estoppel to bar the appellant from disputing the computation after limiting his challenge to jurisdiction.
Sushila Pareek v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging cancellation of a plot allotment due to inordinate delay and laches, affirming that stale claims for allotment restoration are not maintainable.
Moser Baer India Ltd. v. State Bank of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the State Bank of India to provide the petitioner with material and an opportunity of hearing before declaring it a Willful Defaulter under RBI Guidelines.
Raj Kumar Madan v. Hema Bhagia
The Delhi High Court disposed of eviction petitions by directing the petitioners to file a review petition before the trial court to raise contentions under Section 14-D of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, emphasizing procedural propriety.
Abhishek Sharma v. Vipin Kumar
The Delhi High Court allowed revision petitions and acquitted the petitioner after the parties compounded the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, directing his release from custody.
Khurana Enterprises v. The Commissioner Value Added Tax
The Delhi High Court disposed of VAT refund petitions after the respondent confirmed partial payment and assured timely credit of the balance amount, discharging the contempt notice.
India Woods v. Commissioner of Trade & Taxes
The Delhi High Court directed the tax department to release the balance VAT refund with interest within two months, holding that statutory timelines under Section 38 of the DVAT Act cannot be circumvented by administrative delays.
RP MALPIAN&COMPANY v. SANJEEV SRIVASTAVA
The Delhi High Court disposed of contempt petitions as satisfied after the respondents paid the amount directed by the earlier order, and the petitioners chose not to pursue the matter further.
Neeraj@Kashi v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the criminal appeal of Neeraj alias Kashi by referring to a detailed common judgment in a related case.
Commissioner of Income Tax-V v. New Delhi Television Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed Revenue's appeals and delay condonation applications, affirming ITAT's rulings allowing ESOP expenses and treating software expenses as revenue expenditure based on binding precedents.
Pupinder Kaur v. State (GNCT of Delhi); Prem Singh v. State (GNCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners in a cheating and criminal conspiracy case, emphasizing their cooperation with the investigation and the prosecution's non-opposition.
Sh. Balraj & Anr. v. Sh. Rajbir & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the plaintiffs failed to prove ownership and the suit for possession was barred by limitation under Section 27 of the Limitation Act, 1963, affirming the defendants' ownership by prescription.