Nand Kishore@Anand v. Naresh Kumar & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 13 Jul 2016 · 2016:DHC:8636
Manmohan, J
CONT.CAS(C)828/2016
2016:DHC:8636
civil petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed multiple contempt petitions for lack of proof of wilful disobedience of its order, clarifying that no opinion was expressed on the merits of the underlying dispute.

Full Text
Translation output
$--33 to 40 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CONT.CAS(C)828/2016& C.M.Nos.24298-24299/2016
NAND KISHORE@ANAND
Through Mr.Kirti Uppal,Sr.Advoca Petitioner
VERSUS
NARESH KUMAR & ORS
Through
With te with Mr.Satish Kumar Tripathi and Mr.Amit
Dubey,Advocates.
Respondents Mr.Sri HarshaPeechara,ASC with Mr.Mananjay Kumar Mishra,Advocate forNDMC.
CONT.CAS(C)829/2016& C.M.Nos.24300-24301/2016
HARENDERPRASAD
Through Mr.Kirti Uppal,Sr.Advoc Petitioner
VERSUS
NAl^SH KUMAR & ORS
Through
With ate with Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara,ASC with forNDMC.
CONT.CAS(C)830/2016& C.M.Nos.24302-24303/2016
VINOD KESPIARI Petitioner Tlirough Mr.KirtiUppal,Sr.Advocate with
Mi'.Satish Kumar Tripathi and Mr.Amit
VERSUS
Thi'ough forNDMC.
2016:DHC:8636
WITH
CONT.CAS(C)831/2016& C.M.Nos.24304-24305/2016
JAGDESH KUMAR Petitioner Thi'ough
VERSUS
Through Mr.Kirti Uppal,Sr.Advocate with Mr.Sri Eiarsha Peechara,ASC with forNDMC.
WITH
CONT.CAS(C)832/2016& C.M.Nos.24306-24307/2016
MOEE)MUZAEdD Petitioner Thi'ough Mr.Kirti Uppal,Sr.Advocate with
VERSUS
Thi'ough
With forNDMC.
CONT.CAS(C)833/2016& C.M.Nos.24308-24309/2016
SHANKARLAL Petitioner
Through
VERSUS
Through Mr.Kirti Uppal,Sr.Advocate with Mi-.Mananjay Kumar Mishi-a,Advocate for NDMC.
WITH
CONT.CAS(C)834/2016& C.M.Nos.24310-24311/2016
RAMNIWAS Petitioner Thi'ough Mr.Kirti Uppal,Sr.Advocate with
VERSUS
Through Mr.Mananjay Kumar Mishiu,Advocate forNDMC.
And
CONT.CAS(C)835/2016& C.M.Nos.24312-24313/2016
BINADEVI Petitioner
Through Mr.Kirti Uppal,Sr.Advocate with
VERSUS
Through
CORAM:
Mr.SriHarshaPeechara,ASC with Mi'.Mananjay Kumar Mishra,Advocate forNDMC.
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN
13.07.2016 Present contempt petitions have been filed alleging wilful disobedience ofthe undertaking given before this Court on 22"^^ June, 2016 in Contempt Case No.819/2016.
After some arguments,Mr.Kriti Uppal,learned senior counselfor the petitioners candidly admits that no violation ofthe order dated 22"''
June,2016 is made out.
Consequently,the present contempt petitions are dismissed.
In the event, if contempt of any of other order is made out, the petitioners are at liberty to file appropriate proceedings in accordance with law. This Court, however, clarifies that it has not expressed any opinion on the merits ofthe proposed case. Rights and contentions ofall parties are left open. u
MANMOHAN,J JULY 13,2016 KA
JUDGMENT