Delhi High Court
69,037 judgments
AAA Medicare Private Limited & Ors. v. Aditya Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the amended Scheme of Amalgamation of fifteen transferor companies into a transferee company under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, after addressing statutory compliance and objections.
Quadrant EPP Surlon Uttaranchal Private Limited v. Quadrant EPP Surlon India Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between two companies under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing dissolution of the transferor company without winding up.
Neelam Sisodia v. India Tourism Development Corporation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, due to the respondent's failure to do so as per the contract's arbitration clause.
M/S. HIMALAYAN FLORA AND AROMAS PVT. LTD. v. SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of petitions challenging earlier orders with liberty to file fresh petitions against new orders, while continuing the status quo order for three weeks.
Vijay Kumar & Anr. v. University of Delhi & Ors.
Petitions against University of Delhi were dismissed as withdrawn after the petitioners informed the court that the reliefs sought had already been granted.
Union of India v. Shama Rani & Anr
Appeals concerning compensation for acquired lands were dismissed for non-prosecution due to non-payment of court fees, as the issue was conclusively settled by a prior judgment affirmed by the Supreme Court.
Amit Kumar & Anr. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal proceeding under Section 498-A IPC arising from matrimonial disputes upon an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Randeer & Ors. v. State (N.C.T of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal proceeding under Section 498-A IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Sunil & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT Delhi) & Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties in a matrimonial dispute, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Jayant Bhargava & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498-A IPC based on a genuine compromise, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Tahir Ansari & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal proceeding under Section 498-A IPC arising from matrimonial disputes upon amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Rustam & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes upon an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Kripa Narayan v. Mamta Pathak
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court’s order awarding interim maintenance to the wife under Section 125 Cr.P.C., dismissing the husband’s revision petition challenging the amount and entitlement.
Ashok Vihar Residents Welfare Association v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court upheld the allotment and sanctioned construction of a nursery school on a plot earmarked for educational use under the Master Plan Delhi-2021, dismissing petitions challenging the same as without merit.
Sham Bhatia v. Raju Alias Raju Masih
The Delhi High Court held that an application under Order 21 Rule 26 CPC is not maintainable after execution of decree and set aside the order restoring possession to the respondent.
Amit Kumar Dua & Anr v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable FIR under Sections 380 and 454 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
North Delhi Power Ltd. v. Allena Auto Industries (P) Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellate court's decision restraining the power utility from charging higher industrial tariff where excess load was independently powered and not connected to the utility supply line.
Sarthak Aeron v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed AIIMS Bhubneshwar to conduct spot counseling with proper notice after it failed to publish the required admission notice on the official website, thereby denying the petitioner a fair opportunity.
Kinjal Rajnikant Patel v. National Board of Examinations
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging ineligibility for PDCET 2016 admission due to failure to submit proof of passing the qualifying examination by the prescribed cut-off date, holding the eligibility criteria mandatory and binding.
AMMTYS INTERIOR (INDIA) PROJECTS PVT.LTD. v. ITMA HOTELS INDIA PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court held it has jurisdiction to appoint a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 where part of the cause of action arises within its territory and the arbitration clause does not fix the venue.