Union of India v. Shama Rani & Anr

Delhi High Court · 26 Aug 2016 · 2016:DHC:8437
Valmiki J. Mehta
LA.APP. 296/2015
2016:DHC:8437
civil appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

Appeals concerning compensation for acquired lands were dismissed for non-prosecution due to non-payment of court fees, as the issue was conclusively settled by a prior judgment affirmed by the Supreme Court.

Full Text
Translation output
o $-5 to 11 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
LA.APP. 296/2015 and C.M. Appl. Nos. 10658/2015 (for stay, under Order 41 Rule 5 CPC read with Section 151 CPC), 10660/2015 (for condonation of delay of 18 days in filing the appeal, under Order 41 Rule 3A read with Section 151 CPC and
Section 5 of the Limitation Act)
UNION OF INDIA
Through:
VERSUS
Appellant Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Advocate.
DHARAM PAL & ANR Respondents
Through: Mr. Kartik Jindal, Advocate for DDA.
LA.APP. 299/2015 and C.M. Appl. Nos. 10669/2015 (for stay, 10670/2015 (for condonation of delay of 519 days in filing the
UNION OF INDIA Appellant
Through: Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for Mr.
VERSUS
HARIPRAKASH & ANR
Through:
Respondents Mr. Rahul Bakshi and Mr. Nishant Sharma, Advocates for DDA.
LA.APP. 304/2015 and C.M. Appl. Nos. 10726/2015 (for stay, 10727/2015 (for condonation of delay of 484days in filing the
LA.APP. 296/2015 and connected matters page 1 of4
2016:DHC:8437
VERSUS
MUICESHKR GUPTA & ANR Respondents
Through: Mr. Rahul Bakshi and Mr. Nishant Sharma, Advocates for DDA.
LA.APP. 305/2015 and C.M. Appl. Nos. 10752/2015 (for stay, 10753/2015 (for condonation of delay of 577 days in filing the
VERSUS
SHAMA RANI & ANR Respondents
LA.APP. 316/2015 and C.M. Appl. Nos. 10809/2015 (for stay, 10810/2015 (for condonation of delay of 487 days in filing the
LA.APP. 296/2015 andconnected matters page 2of4
/a-
VERSUS
SUBHASH NAGPAL & ANR Respondents
LA.APP. 321/2015 and C.M. Appl. Nos. 10852/2015 (for stay, 10853/2015 (for condonation of delay of 439 days in filing the
UNION OF INDIA
Through:
VERSUS
DINESH KUMAR & ANR
Through:
Appellant Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for Mr. Ms. Mrinalini Sen Gupta and
Ms.Kritika Gupta, Advocates.
LA.APP. 322/2015 and C.M. Appl. Nos. 10752/2015 (for stay, 10753/2015 (for condonation of delay of 577 days in filing the
VERSUS
KUSUM JAIN & ANR
Through None.
LA.APP. 296/2015 and connected matters page 3 of4
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKIJ. MEHTA
26.08.2016
ORDER

1. Counsel for the appellant states that the issue of compensation to be granted for acquired lands in the aforesaid cases stands concluded by the judgment of the learned Single Judge of this Court in the bunch of cases with lead case being Jai Singh Vs. Union of India in LA. Appeal No. 266/2008 decided on 23.8.2011 and against which judgment Special Leave Petition filed in the Supreme Court has been dismissed, and therefore, court fees are not being filed in these appeals which would be governed on merits by the decision in the case ofJai Singh (supra).

2. In view of the above, these appeals are accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution on account of court fees not being paid/filed.

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J AUGUST 26, 2016

M. LA.APP. 296/2015 and connectedmatters page 4of[4]