Full Text
Translation output
ir $-20 to 23 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 5914/2015, C.M. No.10704-05/1016 & C.M. No.14807/2015
M/S. HIMALAYAN FLORA AND AROMAS PVT. LTD. i Petitioner
Through Mr. Anand Mishra and Mr. Hemant Kumar, Advs.
W.P.(C) 5914/2015, C.M. No.10704-05/1016 & C.M. No.14807/2015
M/S. HIMALAYAN FLORA AND AROMAS PVT. LTD. i Petitioner
Through Mr. Anand Mishra and Mr. Hemant Kumar, Advs.
VERSUS
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (SDMC)
Respondent
Through Mr. Mukesh Gupta, standingcounsel.
Respondent
Through Mr. Mukesh Gupta, standingcounsel.
W.P.(C) 5916/2015 & C.M. Nos.10709-10/2015
M/S ANANT ARTS
M/S ANANT ARTS
VERSUS
SDMC
Through Mr. Mukesh Gupta, standing counsel.
Through Mr. Mukesh Gupta, standing counsel.
W.P.(C) 5917/2015 & C.M. Nos.10712-13/2015 & 14803/2015
M/S. HINDUSTAN PUBLICITY PVT. LTD.
M/S. HINDUSTAN PUBLICITY PVT. LTD.
VERSUS
Through Mr. Mukesh Gupta, standing cotmsel.
W.P.(C) 5919/2015 & C.M. Nos.10717-18/2015 & 14803/2015 ;
M/S. OUTDOOR COMMUNICATIONS P. LTD.
Kumar, Advs. j 2016:DHC:8764
M/S. OUTDOOR COMMUNICATIONS P. LTD.
Kumar, Advs. j 2016:DHC:8764
VERSUS
Through Mr. Mukesh Gupta, standing counsel.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
26.08.2016 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw these petitions in view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondent that fi^esh orderhas beenpassedby the Competent Authority/respondent.
These petitions are dismissedas withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court and impugn the fresh order which has been passed and which is known to the petitioner. The petitioner informs this Court that a status quo order was operating in his favour in these matters and this order should enure in his favour till the next three weeks by which time the petitionerproposes to file a fi-esh petition. Orderedaccordingly.
<•
Dismissed as withdrawn.
INDERMEET KAUR, J AUGUST 26,2016 A 2016:DHC:8764
26.08.2016 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw these petitions in view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondent that fi^esh orderhas beenpassedby the Competent Authority/respondent.
These petitions are dismissedas withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court and impugn the fresh order which has been passed and which is known to the petitioner. The petitioner informs this Court that a status quo order was operating in his favour in these matters and this order should enure in his favour till the next three weeks by which time the petitionerproposes to file a fi-esh petition. Orderedaccordingly.
<•
Dismissed as withdrawn.
INDERMEET KAUR, J AUGUST 26,2016 A 2016:DHC:8764
JUDGMENT