Delhi High Court

69,037 judgments

Year:

Rattanindia Power Ltd v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd

29 Aug 2016 · Manmohan Singh, J. · 2016:DHC:6081
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that unconditional Bank Guarantees are independent contracts unaffected by termination of the underlying contract and must be kept alive during arbitration unless exceptional circumstances exist, modifying the Arbitral Tribunal's order to protect the appellant's interests.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Bank Guarantee Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Unconditional Bank Guarantee Termination of Contract

AV Beverages Private Limited v. Solar Print Process Private Limited

29 Aug 2016 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2016:DHC:6071

The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between a wholly owned subsidiary and its holding company under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with meetings of shareholders and creditors due to absence of objections.

corporate petition_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act 1956 Sections 391 to 394 wholly owned subsidiary

HT Media Limited v. HT Digital Streams Limited

29 Aug 2016 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2016:DHC:6087

The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Arrangement between HT Media Limited and HT Digital Streams Limited under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 after requisite approvals and compliance with statutory requirements.

corporate petition_allowed Scheme of Arrangement Companies Act 1956 Companies Act 2013 Shareholders approval

Chandpur Enterprises Limited v. VKM Industries Limited

29 Aug 2016 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2016:DHC:6063

The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Arrangement involving demerger of business divisions under the Companies Act, 1956, allowing procedural lapses to be rectified post-sanction.

corporate petition_allowed Scheme of Arrangement Companies Act 1956 Companies Act 2013 Section 391

Mukesh Bhatia v. Ram Gopal Gupta

29 Aug 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:6085

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking forensic examination of a cheque at a late stage of a long-pending NI Act case, emphasizing prevention of undue delay and the need for timely bona fide applications.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 243 Negotiable Instruments Act Forensic Science Laboratory Cheque dishonour Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act

Lionforge Fracht Veranstalter Private Limited v. Balaji Infra Private Limited & Dighi Port Limited

29 Aug 2016 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2016:DHC:6059

The Delhi High Court allowed the applicant company to dispense with convening shareholder and creditor meetings and sanctioned the Composite Scheme of Arrangement under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956.

corporate appeal_allowed Composite Scheme of Arrangement Companies Act, 1956 Sections 391 and 394 dispensing with meetings

Holistic Dentistry Private Limited v. Kaizen Builders and Developers Private Limited

29 Aug 2016 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2016:DHC:6060

The Delhi High Court allowed the application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for approving a Scheme of Amalgamation where all parties consented in writing, under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956.

corporate appeal_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act, 1956 Sections 391 and 394 dispensing with meetings

Elite Townships Private Limited v. Proud Buildwell Private Limited & Wisdom Infrahome Private Limited

29 Aug 2016 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2016:DHC:6061

The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Arrangement involving demerger and transfer of business undertakings after ensuring compliance with statutory and FDI policy requirements.

corporate petition_allowed Scheme of Arrangement Companies Act 1956 demerger Foreign Direct Investment

B.J. Duplex Boards Limited v. Regional Director, Northern Region

29 Aug 2016 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2016:DHC:6062

The Delhi High Court approved B.J. Duplex Boards Limited's petition for reduction of its share capital under the Companies Act, 1956 and 2013, confirming compliance with statutory requirements and absence of prejudice to creditors or shareholders.

corporate petition_allowed reduction of share capital Companies Act, 1956 Companies Act, 2013 court confirmation

Indeen Bio Power Limited v. Its shareholders

29 Aug 2016 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2016:DHC:6064

The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Arrangement involving reduction and reorganization of share capital of Indeen Bio Power Limited under the Companies Act, 1956, after statutory approvals and no objections from regulatory authorities.

corporate petition_allowed Scheme of Arrangement Companies Act 1956 share capital reduction sanction of scheme

Abhishek v. State & Anr.

29 Aug 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:6086

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 308 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR non-compoundable offence Section 308 IPC

Rajpal v. State NCT of Delhi

29 Aug 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:6084

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to accused in a forgery case, holding that bail cannot be cancelled without cogent grounds such as interference with justice or abuse of bail.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail cancellation of bail forgery fraud

Narender Sagar & Ors. v. State (NCT) of Delhi & Ors.

29 Aug 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:6083

The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable FIR under Sections 308/323/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR non-compoundable offences compromise

Ganges Concast Industries Limited v. Salasar Stainless Limited

29 Aug 2016 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2016:DHC:6040

The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between a wholly owned subsidiary and its holding company under the Companies Act, 1956, subject to compliance with procedural requirements and payment of costs.

corporate petition_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act, 1956 Sections 391 and 394 Companies Act, 2013

Apra Automobiles Private Limited v. Registrar of Companies

29 Aug 2016 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2016:DHC:6072

The Delhi High Court allowed restoration of a company’s name struck off for non-filing of statutory documents under Section 560(6) of the Companies Act, 1956, emphasizing the interests of justice and compliance with procedural requirements.

corporate petition_allowed Significant Companies Act 1956 Section 560 restoration of company name striking off

CFR Asset Reconstruction India Limited v. Regional Director, Northern Region

29 Aug 2016 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2016:DHC:6073

The Delhi High Court approved the reduction of share capital of CFR Asset Reconstruction India Limited after ensuring compliance with statutory procedures and addressing objections raised by the Regional Director.

corporate petition_allowed reduction of share capital Companies Act 1956 Companies Act 2013 special resolution

Marvel Institute of Technology Private Limited; Shiva Infosystem Private Limited; New Ways Buildwell Private Limited v. Yuga Estate Private Limited

29 Aug 2016 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2016:DHC:6074

The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 after finding compliance with statutory requirements and no objections from regulatory authorities.

corporate petition_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act 1956 Sections 391 and 394 transferor company

Masterji Metalloys Private Limited v. Good Luck Steel Tubes Limited

29 Aug 2016 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2016:DHC:6075

The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between Masterji Metalloys Private Limited and Good Luck Steel Tubes Limited under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dissolving the transferor company without winding up.

corporate petition_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act 1956 Section 391 Section 394

Ace Securities Private Limited v. Mani Compusoft Private Limited

29 Aug 2016 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2016:DHC:6076

The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between Ace Securities Private Limited and Mani Compusoft Private Limited under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing the transferor company to be dissolved without winding up.

corporate petition_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act 1956 Section 391 Section 394

GNT Wood Mark Private Limited v. MG Polyplast Industries Private Limited

29 Aug 2016 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2016:DHC:6077

The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between GNT Wood Mark Private Limited and MG Polyplast Industries Private Limited under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dissolving the transferor company without winding up.

corporate petition_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act 1956 Section 391 Section 394