Delhi High Court
69,037 judgments
Yahoo! Inc v. Sanjay Patel & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to Yahoo! Inc. against Apricot Foods Pvt. Ltd. and its director for unauthorized use of the well-known 'YAHOO' trademark on snack products, holding it to be trademark infringement and passing off.
Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board v. Shashi Malik & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme cannot retrospectively withdraw financial upgradations vested under the earlier Assured Career Progression Scheme.
Neetu Tuli v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition by an individual member seeking possession of land allotted to a Cooperative Society, holding that the petitioner lacked locus standi and the claim was barred by laches despite repeated representations.
M/S PHONOGRAPHIC PERFORMANCE LTD. v. AMITABH DEVENDRA & ANR.
The Delhi High Court allowed an interim injunction restraining the respondent association from issuing communications undermining the appellant's exclusive copyright licensing rights, emphasizing the presumption of ownership under Section 55 of the Copyright Act.
Suraj Singh @ Sunny v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the victim's appeal for enhancement of sentence as settled after the respondents voluntarily offered additional compensation, and the victim chose not to proceed.
Krishan Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal holding that a civil suit challenging statutory disciplinary orders under the CISF Act is barred by res judicata and limitation, and such orders must be challenged by writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution.
Harkirat Singh Ryait v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the charge under Section 328 IPC, holding that at the charge framing stage, the victim's allegations of administration of a substance to vitiate consent cannot be disbelieved despite absence of medical evidence.
Vijay Kumar & Ors. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable FIR under Sections 498-A and 307 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Narinder Kumar Sikka v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The High Court upheld the framing of charges against the petitioner for using a forged invitation letter to obtain a visa, holding that sufficient prima facie material existed at the charge framing stage.
Ashok Kumar Bind v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's refusal to recall prosecution witnesses for further cross-examination, holding that once witnesses are examined, cross-examined, and discharged, they cannot be recalled merely due to ineffective earlier cross-examination or change of counsel.
Yogesh Kumar & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498-A IPC based on an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Ashwani Kumar Sharma v. State (GNCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of a husband charged with murder of his wife, holding that parity with co-accused does not guarantee bail and serious offences require careful scrutiny before granting bail.
Inderjeet @ Poppy v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of Inderjeet @ Poppy in a murder case, holding that the prima facie evidence and risk of witness tampering justified denial of bail.
Harbhajan Singh v. State
Bail was rightly refused to an accused charged with murder who was declared a proclaimed offender and absconded, with the court holding that parity with co-accused granted bail is not an absolute ground for release.
Ravi Kant Prabhakar v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
Bail was denied to the petitioner accused of cheating and forgery involving fraudulent discount coupons due to pending investigation, non-arrest of co-accused, and risk of tampering with evidence.
MakeMyTrip (India) Pvt Ltd v. Union of India; IBIBO Group Pvt Ltd v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that DGCEI cannot arrest officials or take coercive action without issuing a show cause notice under the Finance Act, and that online travel agents are liable to pay service tax only on their commission, not on gross hotel booking amounts.
M/S MANGLAYATAM PROJECTS PVT LTD v. DHARAM VEER SINGH THR LRS & ANR
The Delhi High Court granted specific performance of a sale agreement for agricultural land, directing the defendants to execute the sale deed upon payment of the balance consideration and obtaining necessary statutory clearances.
Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Medi Pharma & Another
The Delhi High Court granted a permanent injunction restraining defendants from using the trademark "POLYCAP" for pharmaceutical products, holding it infringed the plaintiff's registered mark and goodwill.
Paramjit Kaur & Ors. v. Teja Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a restrictive clause in a Will prohibiting alienation of property for 10 years post-death, declared a relinquishment deed violating this clause void, and restored the trial court's decree in favor of the appellants.
Amtul Habib v. Maujma Khan
The Delhi High Court set aside the order granting leave to defend in an eviction petition under the DRC Act, affirming the landlord's bona fide requirement and ownership, and passed an eviction order against the tenant.