Delhi High Court
69,037 judgments
M/S APOLLO TYRES LTD v. M/S INDIRA TYRES
The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court's acquittal and convicted the accused under Section 138 NI Act, holding that the cheques were issued for discharge of admitted debt and the defence of security deposit was unsubstantiated.
M/S APOLLO TYRES LTD v. M/S INDIRA TYRES
The Delhi High Court set aside the Trial Court's acquittal and convicted the accused for dishonour of 61 cheques under Section 138 NI Act, holding that their unsubstantiated claim of security deposit failed to rebut the statutory presumption of debt.
M/S APOLLO TYRES LTD v. M/S INDIRA TYRES
The High Court convicted the respondents under Section 138 NI Act, holding that admission of debt and issuance of cheques in reply to statutory notice establishes liability, and unsubstantiated security deposit claims do not discharge it.
M/S APOLLO TYRES LTD v. M/S INDIRA TYRES
The Delhi High Court set aside the acquittal and convicted the accused under Section 138 NI Act, holding that admission of debt and issuance of cheques creates a presumption of liability which cannot be rebutted by unsubstantiated claims of security deposit.
M/S APOLLO TYRES LTD v. M/S INDIRA TYRES
The High Court set aside the acquittal and convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that admission of debt in reply to statutory notice establishes liability despite unsubstantiated claims of security deposit.
State Bank of India v. M/S. Malini Management and Consultancy Pvt. Ltd and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a bank's irrevocable written instructions to pay a liquidated amount to a third party create a binding contract enforceable under Order XXXVII CPC, estopping the bank from denying liability despite absence of privity of contract.
Shri Hukam Singh & Ors. v. Shri Joginder Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal upholding dismissal of a suit for cancellation of sale deed and possession due to failure to prove ownership and the suit being barred by limitation.
Gurvinder Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi and Another
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash the FIR and upheld the Trial Court's order summoning the accused to face trial, emphasizing the limited scope of interference under Section 482 Cr.P.C. at the cognizance stage and the primacy of victim's testimony in sexual offence cases.
M/S APOLLO TYRES LTD v. M/S INDIRA TYRES
The High Court reversed the Trial Court's acquittal and convicted the accused under Section 138 NI Act, holding that admission of issuance of cheques against outstanding debts rebuts the defence of security deposit without documentary proof.
M/S APOLLO TYRES LTD v. M/S INDIRA TYRES
The High Court set aside the acquittal and convicted the accused under Section 138 NI Act, holding that admission of debt in reply to statutory notice precludes defence of security deposit without evidence.
M/S APOLLO TYRES LTD v. M/S INDIRA TYRES
The High Court set aside the Trial Court's acquittal and convicted the accused under Section 138 NI Act, holding that admission of debt and issuance of cheques in statutory notice reply creates an irrebuttable presumption of liability absent credible contrary evidence.
Dr. Jang Bahadur Singh v. Jasmohan Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit challenging share transfers effected pursuant to final foreign court orders, holding the suit infructuous and an abuse of process under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
U.P. State Road Transport Corporation v. Ranjeet Kumar
Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for grievous injuries in a motor accident and mandated protective fixed deposit schemes to safeguard award amounts from misuse.
U.P. State Road Transport Corporation v. Ranjeet Kumar
Delhi High Court enhanced motor accident compensation and directed safeguarding of award amounts through phased fixed deposits with strict conditions to protect the claimant's interests.
M.P. State Cooperative Consumer Federation Ltd. v. National Cooperative Consumer Federation of India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award for lack of specific documentary evidence and upheld the limited scope of judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
M/S APOLLO TYRES LTD v. M/S INDIRA TYRES
The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court's acquittal and convicted the accused for dishonour of 61 cheques under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that admission of debt in reply to statutory notice establishes liability unless credibly rebutted.
M/S APOLLO TYRES LTD v. M/S INDIRA TYRES
The High Court overturned the acquittal and convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that admissions in the statutory notice and lack of documentary proof failed to rebut the presumption of liability for dishonoured cheques.
Saroj Kumar Yadav & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal FIR under Sections 308/34 IPC based on an amicable compromise between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Sudesh v. Suresh Solanki
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's decree dissolving marriage on grounds of mental cruelty and dismissed the wife's petition for restitution of conjugal rights due to lack of credible evidence and voluntary abandonment of matrimonial home.
Sudesh v. Suresh Solanki
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's dismissal of the wife's petition for restitution of conjugal rights and granted divorce to the husband on grounds of mental cruelty and desertion under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.