Delhi High Court

69,037 judgments

Year:

Chattarpal Singh & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

02 Sep 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:6243

The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498-A IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. Section 498-A IPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute

Avon Cycles Limited v. Avon Corporation Ltd

02 Sep 2016 · Hima Kohli · 2016:DHC:6254

The Delhi High Court permitted the plaintiff to withdraw the suit against a defendant company under provisional liquidation without prejudice to filing a fresh suit in the future.

civil appeal_allowed withdrawal of suit provisional liquidator company liquidation leave to withdraw

Foundation e-Learning Private Limited v. Cambridge University Press India Private Limited

02 Sep 2016 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2016:DHC:6237

The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between Foundation e-Learning Private Limited and Cambridge University Press India Private Limited under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 after statutory compliance and resolution of objections.

corporate petition_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act 1956 Sections 391 to 394 transferor company

Mamta v. State & Mangat Ram

02 Sep 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:6236

The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable theft FIR under Section 380 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR non-compoundable offence Section 380 IPC

Pen Investments Limited v. Pivet Finances Limited

02 Sep 2016 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2016:DHC:6235

The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Composite Scheme of Capital Reduction and Amalgamation involving eight transferor companies and one transferee company under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dissolving the transferor companies without winding up.

corporate petition_allowed Composite Scheme Capital Reduction Amalgamation Companies Act 1956

Dashrath v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors

02 Sep 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:6234

The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable FIR under Sections 279/337 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR non-compoundable offence Section 279 IPC

Ideal Knowledge Park Private Limited v. Barberry Real Estate and Land Developers Private Limited

02 Sep 2016 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2016:DHC:6250

The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation between four transferor companies and one transferee company under the Companies Act, 1956, finding no objections and directing dissolution of transferor companies without winding up.

corporate petition_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act 1956 Sections 391, 392, 394 transferor company

Karan Exports Private Limited v. Shree Puja Overseas Private Limited

02 Sep 2016 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2016:DHC:6249

The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between Karan Exports Private Limited and Shree Puja Overseas Private Limited under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dissolving the transferor company without winding up.

corporate petition_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act 1956 Sections 391 to 394 transferor company

Sanjay Kumar @ Bablu v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr

02 Sep 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:6248

The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498-A IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR Section 498-A IPC matrimonial dispute

Rita Khaneja v. Rajesh Khaneja

02 Sep 2016 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2016:DHC:6247-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the wife's appeal for enhanced maintenance beyond the husband's documented income under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, emphasizing maintenance as temporary relief and directing expeditious disposal of the pending divorce petition.

family appeal_dismissed Significant maintenance pendente lite Section 24 Hindu Marriage Act divorce petition delay income assessment

Aleron Builders & Constructions Private Limited & Ors. v. Atherol Builders & Developers Private Limited

02 Sep 2016 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2016:DHC:6251

The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956 to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for approving a Scheme of Amalgamation where all parties had given written consent.

corporate appeal_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Section 391 Companies Act 1956 dispensing meetings equity shareholders consent

Gifford India Private Limited v. Ramboll India Private Limited

02 Sep 2016 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2016:DHC:6252

The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and unsecured creditors for approving a Scheme of Arrangement under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, based on majority written consents.

corporate appeal_allowed Scheme of Arrangement Companies Act 1956 Sections 391 to 394 dispensing meetings

Sugam Exim Private Limited v. Atlas Constructions Private Limited

02 Sep 2016 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2016:DHC:6239

The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Arrangement amalgamating four transferor companies into a transferee company under the Companies Act, 1956, after ensuring compliance with statutory and regulatory requirements including RBI norms.

corporate petition_allowed Scheme of Arrangement Companies Act 1956 amalgamation transferor company

Puriflair India Private Limited v. Delair India Private Limited

02 Sep 2016 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2016:DHC:6240

The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between Puriflair India Private Limited and Delair India Private Limited under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dissolving the transferor company without winding up.

corporate petition_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act 1956 Sections 391 to 394 transferor company

Lalit Kumar v. The State (Through Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr

02 Sep 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:6238

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 304-A IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR non-compoundable offences Sections 279 and 304-A IPC

Vishal Thakur & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

02 Sep 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:6241

The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498-A IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR Section 498-A IPC matrimonial dispute

Mahesh Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

02 Sep 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:6242

The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable theft FIR under Section 380 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR non-compoundable offence Section 380 IPC

Shanti Devi & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

02 Sep 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:6253

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on an amicable settlement between parties in a matrimonial dispute, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR Section 498-A IPC Dowry Prohibition Act

Gaurav Karn v. Union of India

02 Sep 2016 · Sunil Gaur · 2016:DHC:6263

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and condonation application, holding that the appellant failed to show sufficient cause for the inordinate delay in filing the claim petition and appeal, thereby upholding the dismissal of the claim as time barred.

civil appeal_dismissed condonation of delay sufficient cause limitation period claim petition

Punjab National Bank v. BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd.

02 Sep 2016 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2016:DHC:6233-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a supplementary electricity bill raised within two years of discovering a bona fide mistake in the Current Transformer Ratio, holding that the Electricity Act, 2003 overrides earlier regulatory limitations on recovery.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Electricity Act, 2003 Section 56(2) Limitation period Current Transformer Ratio