Delhi High Court

69,037 judgments

Year:

Karambir Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

07 Nov 2016 · Indermeet Kaur · 2016:DHC:7371
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld mutation orders in favor of respondents after concluding that title was conclusively established and mutation jurisdiction properly exercised by the Tehsildar in an undisputed case.

property appeal_dismissed Significant mutation Delhi Land Revenue Act, 1954 lawful possession sale deed validity

Satbir Singh v. Ghanshyam Dass & Ors.

07 Nov 2016 · Indermeet Kaur · 2016:DHC:7369

Judgment delivered by the Delhi High Court in W.P.(C) 3486/2013 involving petitioner Satbir Singh and respondents Ghanshyam Dass and others on November 7, 2016.

other other High Court of Delhi Writ Petition Satbir Singh Ghanshyam Dass

Prabhakar Jeyapathy v. Akshaya Pvt Ltd

07 Nov 2016 · S. Muralidhar · 2016:DHC:7368

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte arbitral award for lack of proper service of the complaint, holding that failure to serve the complaint as per procedural rules violates natural justice and warrants setting aside the award under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 ex parte award natural justice

ICON BUILD CON. PVT.LTD v. AGGARWAL DEVELOPERS PVT.LTD

07 Nov 2016 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2016:DHC:7375

The Delhi High Court held that an application under Order XXXVII Rule 4 CPC to set aside a summary suit decree is not maintainable after leave to defend has been considered and refused, and only the appellate court can entertain such application once the decree has merged into its judgment.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order XXXVII Rule 4 CPC summary suit leave to defend doctrine of merger

M/S WORLDWIDE MACHINERY SOLUTIONS PVT LTD v. M/S BALIYAN ENTERPRISES PVT LTD & ORS

07 Nov 2016 · G.S. Sistani · 2016:DHC:7376

The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction restraining defendants from encashing post-dated cheques issued under a coerced settlement agreement involving misuse of police power, emphasizing the need for a strong prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury for interlocutory relief.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant interlocutory injunction Order XXXIX CPC coercion duress

Anil Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi

07 Nov 2016 · Gita Mittal; P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:7366-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC based on credible eyewitness and medical evidence, dismissing claims of lack of intent and weapon's dangerousness.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC murder eyewitness testimony medical evidence

M/S Mohan Meakin Limited v. M/S High Brew International Pvt Ltd & Ors.

07 Nov 2016 · G.S. Sistani · 2016:DHC:7365

The Delhi High Court decreed a trademark infringement suit in terms of a mediation settlement and granted refund of court fees under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act.

civil appeal_allowed Settlement Agreement Permanent Injunction Trademark Infringement Copyright Infringement

Pooja Gosain v. Sunil Gosain

07 Nov 2016 · G.S. Sistani · 2016:DHC:7364

The Delhi High Court recorded an amicable settlement between siblings regarding inheritance shares, vehicle ownership, and property sale, decreeing the suit accordingly.

civil settled amicable settlement partition suit inheritance rights declaration of share

Xstrata Coal Marketing AG v. Dalmia Bharat (Cement) Ltd

07 Nov 2016 · Vibhu Bahru · 2016:DHC:7363

The Delhi High Court upheld enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, holding that the awards did not violate the narrow scope of Indian public policy under Section 48 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil petition_dismissed Significant foreign arbitral award enforcement public policy Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Zinda Singh v. Sunil Kumar and Anr.

07 Nov 2016 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2016:DHC:7362

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Regular Second Appeal, upholding the plaintiff's ownership and possession rights over the suit property based on valid title documents and rejecting the defendant's unsubstantiated denial.

civil appeal_dismissed Regular Second Appeal Section 100 CPC possession suit title documents

Pradeep Dpiwan v. State; Prateek Dmawan v. State

04 Nov 2016 · S. P. Garg · 2016:DHC:8735

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners in a multi-section IPC case, considering their cooperation with investigation and voluntary compensation to the complainant.

criminal appeal_allowed anticipatory bail Section 377 IPC Section 498A IPC voluntary compensation

Virtuous Retail Ltd v. Kakade Construction Company Private Ltd

04 Nov 2016 · Manmohan J · 2016:DHC:8696

The Delhi High Court disposed of contempt petitions as satisfied and cancelled bailable warrants following a full and final settlement between the parties involving payment of Rs. 50 crores.

civil other contempt petition settlement agreement bailable warrant court order

Veerpal Singh v. Union of India; Jang Bhadur Singh v. Union of India

04 Nov 2016 · Indira Banerjee; V. Kameswar Rao · 2016:DHC:8671-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the competent authority to treat writ petitions on pay fixation as representations and decide them within eight weeks, emphasizing administrative consideration before judicial intervention.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition pay fixation competent authority representation

Union of India & Ors. v. Malbika Deb Gupta

04 Nov 2016 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sunita Gupta · 2016:DHC:8645-DB

Delhi High Court held that pay fixation under Rule 7A(ii) of the CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008 applies to all employees irrespective of appointment date, dismissing Union of India's challenge to CAT orders granting revised pay benefits to pre-2006 appointees.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant CCS Revised Pay Rules 2008 Rule 7A Note 2A pay fixation

Divya Jyoti Kanal & Anr v. Sanjukta S J Bahadur & Anr

04 Nov 2016 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2016:DHC:7355

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiffs' suit for partition and declaration of interest in HUF properties, holding that married daughters cannot claim coparcenary rights in an HUF created after their marriage and that a registered relinquishment deed bars their claim.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Hindu Undivided Family partition suit Release Deed married daughters

Hyacintia Real Estate Developers Private Limited v. Kavicon Partners Limited & Ors.

04 Nov 2016 · Siddharth Mridul · 2016:DHC:7356-DB

The Delhi High Court sanctioned a scheme of amalgamation under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with meetings of shareholders and creditors due to their unanimous written consent.

corporate appeal_allowed scheme of amalgamation Companies Act 1956 Sections 391 to 394 dispensation of meetings

Anuradha Chaudhary v. State

04 Nov 2016 · Vipin Sanghi · 2016:DHC:7354

Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner accused of misrepresenting authority and using forged documents in a property sale, as custodial interrogation was necessary to investigate serious criminal allegations.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. cheating forgery

FLAMAGAS, SA v. SUNDER & ORS

04 Nov 2016 · G.S. Sistani · 2016:DHC:7359

The Delhi High Court granted ex parte permanent injunction and punitive damages to the plaintiff for trademark infringement and passing off by defendants selling counterfeit 'Clipper' lighters, applying Order VIII Rule 10 CPC for summary decree.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off Order VIII Rule 10 CPC punitive damages

FLAMAGAS, SA v. IRFAN AHMED & ORS

04 Nov 2016 · G.S. Sistani · 2016:DHC:7358

The Delhi High Court decreed a commercial suit granting permanent injunction and punitive damages against defendants for trademark infringement and passing off of plaintiff's 'CLIPPER' lighters, relying on Order VIII Rule 10 CPC for summary disposal due to defendants' non-appearance.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off Order VIII Rule 10 CPC punitive damages

KRBL LTD v. PK OVERSEAS PVT LTD

04 Nov 2016 · Sunil Gaur · 2016:DHC:7351

The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court’s rejection of interim injunction in a passing off suit concerning trade dress colour combination, directing a fresh hearing after proper document admission and denial.

civil other Significant passing off trade dress colour combination interim injunction