Delhi High Court
69,037 judgments
M/S RIDDHI VISION v. THE MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking extension for digital set-top box installation, directing compliance with the government-mandated deadline for digital transmission conversion.
M/S BHIMA RIDHDHI DIGITAL SERVICES v. THE MINISTRY OF INFORMATION & BROADCASTING & ANR
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking extension for digital set-top box installation, directing completion of digital migration by the stipulated deadline and cessation of analogue signals.
Attar Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years, regardless of possession claims.
Santosh Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is not paid within five years under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, and directed payment of compensation to landowners despite physical possession and use of the land.
TEXMACO RAIL & ENGINEERING LTD v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
The Delhi High Court upheld the bona fide decision of the Railway Tender Committee to cancel and re-tender BOXNS wagons, dismissing the petition alleging arbitrariness and directing no interference in the commercial discretion exercised.
Shashi Shekhar @ Neeraj v. State of the NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that life imprisonment means imprisonment for natural life unless remitted by competent authority, rejected the petitioner's claim to premature release as a matter of right after 25 years, and refused parole during pendency of the writ petition, emphasizing the discretionary nature of premature release and parole under law.
Amit Ved v. Guljinder Singh & Anr
The High Court held that a petitioner claiming ownership is neither a necessary nor proper party to a suit for mandatory injunction regarding electricity supply and dismissed his application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.
CMYK PRINTECH LTD. v. UNITED INDIA PERIODICALS PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court upheld a mediated settlement in a lease dispute, ruling that the appellant ratified its representative's authority despite a purported revocation, and dismissed the appeal seeking to set aside the settlement on grounds of fraud and lack of authority.
National Highway Authority of India v. GVK Jaipur Expressway Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting compensation to a toll operator for loss of revenue due to statutory suspension of toll collection following demonetization, holding the event constituted a change in law under the concession agreement.
Union of India Ministry of Railways v. Kishan Lal Meena
The Delhi High Court quashed a CIC order directing disclosure of personal information under the RTI Act for lack of reasoned findings and public interest justification.
National Highways Authority of India v. Prakash Atlanta JV
The Delhi High Court held that limitation for challenging an arbitral award under Section 34 starts from disposal of a Section 33 application, condoned a 28-day delay, upheld the arbitral award rejecting NHAI's counter-claims, and directed release of the performance bank guarantee to PAJV.
M/S OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD v. VIJAY MAHAJAN
The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court's order summoning senior officers of ONGC as witnesses due to lack of cogent reasons and held that such interlocutory orders are not maintainable under Section 115 CPC.
Jagat Lalpaswan & Anr. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIRs arising from a trivial neighborly quarrel after the parties amicably settled and chose not to pursue criminal proceedings.
Radhika v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
Anticipatory bail was denied to the mother-in-law accused in a dowry death case due to serious allegations corroborated by prior complaints and non-cooperation with investigation.
Ramprakash v. TT o Axtd
The High Court declined to entertain writ petitions connected to a pending criminal case and granted liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate petitions after the criminal proceedings conclude.
Bishamberdutt v. GNCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of writ petitions by ordering replacement of an enquiry officer above 70 years of age with a new officer, allowing the petitioners to participate in the enquiry.
UP Technical Education Department v. M/S RITES & ANR
The court held that delay in challenging an arbitral award under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration Act cannot be condoned beyond 30 days, dismissing appeals with a 333-day delay.
Manjeet Singh v. Lt. Governor-Cum-Administrator
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is unpaid for over five years, directing fresh acquisition or return of possession.
Eshu Chaudhary v. Delhi High Court Bar Association
The Delhi High Court directed the use of Electronic Voting Machines and adherence to existing election by-laws in the Bar Association election, dismissing the writ petition as the issues were already finally adjudicated.
Union of India and Ors. v. Deena Nath and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order protecting employees' pay fixation pursuant to tribunal directions, dismissing the government's challenge based on departmental circulars and pay recovery.