Veerpal Singh v. Union of India; Jang Bhadur Singh v. Union of India

Delhi High Court · 04 Nov 2016 · 2016:DHC:8671-DB
Indira Banerjee; V. Kameswar Rao
W.P.(C) 10451/2016; W.P.(C) 10468/2016
2016:DHC:8671-DB
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed the competent authority to treat writ petitions on pay fixation as representations and decide them within eight weeks, emphasizing administrative consideration before judicial intervention.

Full Text
Translation output
■r--.
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 10451/2016
VEERPAL SINGH Petitioner
Through: Ms. SaahilaLamba & Mr. T.S. Dagar, Advocates.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ' ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Jagjit Singh,Mr.Preet Singh,Mr. Sukhdev Singh & Ms. KiranKaushik, Advocates for Railways.
W.P.(C) 10468/2016
JANG BHADUR SINGH & ANR Petitioners
Through: Ms. SaahilaLamba & Mr. T.S. Dagar, Advocates.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA «& ORS Respondents
Through: Mr. Jagjit Singh, Mr. Preet Singh,Mr. Sukhdev Singh & Ms. Kiran Kaushik, Advocates for Railways.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
04.11.2016 After hearing the learned counsel Ms. Saahila Lamba appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Jagjit Singh, the learned counsel appearing onbehalf oftherespondents, the writ petitions are disposed ofby directing
W.P.(C) Nos. 10451/2016, 10468/2016 page 1of2
■ ^
2016:DHC:8671-DB the competent authority to treat the writ petition(s) as representation(s) of the petitioners for pay fixation and to consider and dispose of the representation(s)in accordance with law within eight weeksfrom the date of communication ofthis order.
INDIRA BANERJEE,J V.KAMESWAR RAO,J NOVEMBER 04,2016 rs a
W.P.(C)Nos. 10451/2016, 10468/2016 page 2of2 2016:DHC:8671-DB
JUDGMENT