Delhi High Court
69,037 judgments
Sandeep Sachdeva & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial FIR under Sections 498-A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on an amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Atul Verma v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal proceeding under Section 498-A IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Paramjeet Singh & Anr v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 420, 406, and 120B IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Jai Karan v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the police's administrative order to keep the petitioner under surveillance based on reasonable belief of habitual criminality despite acquittals, dismissing the petition to quash his name from the Surveillance Register.
Amit Kumar Mutreja & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC upon amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Sachin Goyal & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A/406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes upon amicable settlement, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Hafiz Ahmad Hussain & Ors. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 323, 324, 341, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Farhan Alam v. The State (Govt of NCT Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable theft FIR under Section 380 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Brijesh Gautam and Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable offence FIR under Sections 326/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Pawan Kumar Aggarwal v. Usha Rani
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging the dismissal of a perjury application under Section 340 Cr.P.C., holding no prima facie case of perjury was made out and inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. were rightly not exercised.
Kanhiya Lal v. The Ld. District and Sessions Judge (HQ)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition for lack of cause of action and absence of prayer to set aside the disciplinary authority's order limiting suspension benefits to suspension allowance.
Mr. Vivek Chib, Mr. Asif Ahmed, Mr. Rishabh Kapur and Mr. Kushal Gupta, Advocates. v. DELHI TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY & ANR .....
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions seeking regularization of contractual Assistant Professors, reaffirming that regularization requires adherence to constitutional recruitment procedures as laid down in the Supreme Court's Umadevi judgment.
Pooja Saxena v. Union Bank of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking regularization of contractual employment on res judicata grounds but directed payment of any outstanding variable monetary component as per the employment contract.
Subhash Kwatra v. Registrar of Co-operative Societies & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed review petitions to exclude flats D-403 and F-301 from eviction orders, recognizing lawful allotment and possession by original allottees or their transferees.
J.P. Dubey v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a CRPF officer on deputation is entitled to arrears of salary and promotion benefits granted by a binding Supreme Court order, and directed payment of such arrears with interest.
Bablu Kumar Tiwari v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking quashing of FIRs on compromise grounds due to the petitioner’s prior criminal record and public interest considerations.
Sarita Khokhar v. State
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners accused under Sections 323/341/354B/506/34 IPC, considering simple injuries, delay in FIR, and cooperation with investigation.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-9 v. Vishuimpex Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's decision that penalty under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act cannot be imposed beyond the limitation period prescribed under Section 275(1)(c), dismissing the appeal.
Commissioner of Income Tax-III v. Shubhani Engineering & Consultant Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's time-barred appeals for lack of sufficient cause to condone a 997-day delay in re-filing against the ITAT's order.
Travelport L.P. v. Commissioner of Income Tax International Taxation -3, New Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeals holding that the legal question was identical to a prior binding decision which the tribunal had correctly applied.