Full Text
Translation output
$-1,18 19 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
ITA 302/2016
TRAVELPORT L.P.,USA Appellant
Through Mr Ajay Vohra,Senior Advocate and Mr Prakash Kumar,Adv.
ITA 302/2016
TRAVELPORT L.P.,USA Appellant
Through Mr Ajay Vohra,Senior Advocate and Mr Prakash Kumar,Adv.
VERSUS
COMMISSIGNER OFINCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION-3,NEW DELHI .....Respondent
Through Mr. Dileep Shivpuri, Senior Standing Counsel, Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Junior Standing
Counsel and Mr.Vikrant A Maheshwari,Adv.
Through Mr. Dileep Shivpuri, Senior Standing Counsel, Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Junior Standing
Counsel and Mr.Vikrant A Maheshwari,Adv.
WITH
ITA 298/2016
MrPrakash Kumar,Adv.
MrPrakash Kumar,Adv.
VERSUS
COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -3,NEW DELHI Respondent
Through Mr. Dileep Shivpuri, Senior Standing Counsel and Mr.Vikrant Maheshwari,Adv.
And
Through Mr. Dileep Shivpuri, Senior Standing Counsel and Mr.Vikrant Maheshwari,Adv.
And
ITA 299/2016
MrPrakash Kumar,Adv.
MrPrakash Kumar,Adv.
VERSUS
COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL 2016:DHC:8395-DB
TAXATION-3 NEW DELHI R6spondent
Through Mr.Dileep Shivpuri, Senior Standing Counsel and Mr.Vikrant A Maheshwari,Adv.
TAXATION-3 NEW DELHI R6spondent
Through Mr.Dileep Shivpuri, Senior Standing Counsel and Mr.Vikrant A Maheshwari,Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NAJMIWAZIRI
09.11.2016 The question oflaw urged bythe assessee in these appeals is identical to what was decided by this Court in Director ofIncome Tax v. Galileo
International Inc. 2009(2) TMI 497 (Delhi). In fact, the ITAT, by the impugned order, has relied upon and followed that decision. The question oflaw urged does notarise. The appeals are,therefore,dismissed.
S.RAVINDRA BHAT,J NAJMJAVAZIRI,J NOVEMBER 09,2016/acm
2016:DHC:8395-DB
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NAJMIWAZIRI
09.11.2016 The question oflaw urged bythe assessee in these appeals is identical to what was decided by this Court in Director ofIncome Tax v. Galileo
International Inc. 2009(2) TMI 497 (Delhi). In fact, the ITAT, by the impugned order, has relied upon and followed that decision. The question oflaw urged does notarise. The appeals are,therefore,dismissed.
S.RAVINDRA BHAT,J NAJMJAVAZIRI,J NOVEMBER 09,2016/acm
2016:DHC:8395-DB
JUDGMENT