Delhi High Court

67,253 judgments

Year:

Kamleshwar Pratap v. Registrar Cooperative Societies

15 Dec 2016 · Sanjiv Khanna; Chander Shekhar · 2016:DHC:8014-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a flawed allotment draw excluding senior members from category 'A' flats in a cooperative housing society and directed a fresh, transparent allotment process.

property appeal_allowed Significant cooperative society allotment of flats category A flats draw of lots

Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi v. Late Sh. K.M. Bijli thru LRs

15 Dec 2016 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Najmi Waziri · 2016:DHC:8009-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's deletion of income additions based on informal UK tax statements, emphasizing the need for objective evidence and timely reassessment proceedings.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Reassessment Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement Informal Statements Corroborative Evidence

Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-I v. M/S Russian Technology Centre (P) Ltd

15 Dec 2016 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Najmi Waziri · 2016:DHC:8026-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's deletion of additions under Section 68, holding that the assessee discharged its burden to prove genuineness and creditworthiness of foreign share capital receipts supported by documentary evidence.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 68 Income Tax Act share application money genuineness of transaction creditworthiness of creditor

Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-I v. M/S Russian Technology Centre (P) Ltd

15 Dec 2016 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Najmi Waziri · 2016:DHC:8019-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's deletion of additions under Section 68, holding that the assessee discharged the burden of proving genuineness and creditworthiness of foreign share capital transactions.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 68 Income Tax Act share application money genuineness of transaction creditworthiness

Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-I v. M/S Russian Technology Centre (P) Ltd

15 Dec 2016 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Najmi Waziri · 2016:DHC:8020-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's deletion of additions under Section 68, holding that the assessee discharged its burden to prove the genuineness and creditworthiness of foreign share capital transactions.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 68 Income Tax Act share application money creditworthiness genuineness of transaction

Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-I v. M/S Russian Technology Centre (P) Ltd

15 Dec 2016 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Najmi Waziri · 2016:DHC:8022-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's deletion of additions under Section 68, holding that the assessee discharged the burden of proving genuineness and creditworthiness of share application money with credible evidence and proper approvals.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 68 Income Tax Act share application money genuineness of transaction creditworthiness

Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-I v. M/S Russian Technology Centre (P) Ltd

15 Dec 2016 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Najmi Waziri · 2016:DHC:8023-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's deletion of additions under Section 68, holding that the assessee discharged the burden to prove genuineness and creditworthiness of foreign share capital investments supported by credible evidence.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 68 Income Tax Act share application money creditworthiness genuineness of transaction

Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-I v. M/S Russian Technology Centre (P) Ltd

15 Dec 2016 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Najmi Waziri · 2016:DHC:8024-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's deletion of additions under Section 68, holding that the assessee discharged the burden of proving genuineness and creditworthiness of foreign share capital transactions supported by credible documentary evidence.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 68 Income Tax Act share application money genuineness of transaction creditworthiness

Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-I v. M/S Russian Technology Centre (P) Ltd

15 Dec 2016 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Najmi Waziri · 2016:DHC:8027-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's deletion of additions under Section 68, holding that the assessee discharged the burden to prove genuineness and creditworthiness of foreign share capital transactions.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 68 Income Tax Act share application money genuineness of transaction creditworthiness of creditor

S.N. Santosh Kumar v. M/S Akshya Textiles Ltd. and Ors.

15 Dec 2016 · Indira Banerjee; Anil Kumar Chawla · 2016:DHC:8018-DB

The writ petition challenging BIFR and Appellate Authority orders was dismissed as infructuous following the repeal of SICA and dissolution of the authorities.

administrative petition_dismissed Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1986 Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Repeal Act, 2003 Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction BIFR

Neerja Sharma v. Sameer Jain

15 Dec 2016 · Jayant Nath · 2016:DHC:8028

The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order allowing a landlord to recover possession on bona fide requirement grounds under the Delhi Rent Control Act, emphasizing the landlord's right to occupy and the reasonableness of his need.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) bona fide requirement eviction

Pradeep Chikkara v. The State; Dharmender Kumar v. The State

15 Dec 2016 · Vipin Sanghi · 2016:DHC:8303

The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail applications of accused in a forgery case involving disputed property documents, emphasizing the necessity of custodial interrogation based on forensic evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail forgery custodial interrogation agreement to sell

Ishwar Singh v. University of Delhi & Anr

15 Dec 2016 · Jayant Nath

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s revision petitions challenging the trial court’s refusal to implead DDA, grant passage through a boundary wall, and appoint a Local Commissioner in a long-pending suit for possession and title.

civil appeal_dismissed impleadment Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Section 151 CPC Order 26 Rule 9 CPC

Sachin Aggarwal v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

15 Dec 2016 · A. K. Pathak · 2016:DHC:9154

The Delhi High Court quashed two cross FIRs involving minor offences on the ground of amicable settlement between the parties at the investigation stage.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 482 CrPC minor offences

Ashok Bhadauria v. State; C.P. Yadav & Anr. v. State; Kishan Lal Nagpal & Ors. v. State

15 Dec 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:9156

The High Court held that a trial court must apply judicial mind and record reasons when framing charges, setting aside a non-speaking order that failed to do so.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant framing of charge Section 227 CrPC Section 228 CrPC non-speaking order

Avinash v. State

15 Dec 2016 · Vipin Sanghi · 2016:DHC:9159

The Delhi High Court granted parole to a convicted prisoner with unsatisfactory jail conduct for a limited period to enable filing a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court, subject to strict conditions.

criminal petition_allowed parole Special Leave Petition convicted prisoner jail conduct

Dr Mohdidrees (Raja) & Anr v. Baburam & Ors

15 Dec 2016 · Pratibha Rani · 2016:DHC:9193

The Delhi High Court disposed of civil appeals by modifying the trial court decree to reflect a court-recorded settlement involving nominal division of a disputed plot and withdrawal of mesne profit claims.

civil appeal_allowed civil suit property dispute nominal division floor area ratio

Narender Batra v. CBI

15 Dec 2016 · Vipin Sanghi · 2016:DHC:9210

The Delhi High Court dismissed the criminal writ petition filed by Narender Batra as withdrawn after allowing an exemption application.

criminal petition_dismissed Procedural petition withdrawal criminal writ petition exemption application CBI

TATA SONS LIMITED v. RAM NIWAS & ORS

15 Dec 2016 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2016:DHC:8008

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and domain name transfer to Tata Sons Ltd, holding that defendants' use of 'TATA Packers and Movers' and www.tatapackers.com infringed the well-known 'TATA' trademark.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Trademark infringement Passing off Permanent injunction Domain name

Govind Kr Verma and Anr v. Joint Registrar (Medical) Faculty of Ayurvedic and Unani Medicines and Anr

15 Dec 2016 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2016:DHC:7993

The Delhi High Court held that the statutory 3% horizontal reservation for persons with disabilities must be implemented on a vacancy basis within the OBC category, directing admission of a physically disabled petitioner despite limited seats.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995 horizontal reservation vertical reservation PWD quota