Delhi High Court
67,253 judgments
BUDDHI VIDHATAJAN KALYAN SAMITI v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court upheld the Ministry of AYUSH's lawful disapproval of new homeopathic college proposals due to non-compliance with prescribed minimum standards and proper administrative procedure.
Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-I v. M/S Russian Technology Centre (P) Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's deletion of additions under Section 68, holding that the assessee discharged its burden to prove the genuineness and creditworthiness of foreign share capital and loans through credible evidence.
M/S PAL METAL WORKS v. COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES
The Delhi High Court directed the Commissioner of Trade & Taxes to pay refund amounts with interest under the DVAT Act, pass speaking orders if interest is withheld, and remit payments within ten days, disposing of multiple writ petitions accordingly.
Jamia Cooperative Bank Limited v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition as withdrawn after the impugned order was withdrawn and a fresh show cause notice issued, without expressing any opinion on the merits.
Lokesh Kumar v. Keshav Chandra
The court held that forwarding eligible candidates' names is the Selection Board's duty, but appointment and entitlement to back wages depend on the requisitioning department's discretion, dismissing the petition for back wages.
Anil Bansal v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the UPSC's shortlisting criteria for recruitment, dismissing the petitioner's challenge after he was allowed to appear in the interview under an interim order that was later rendered ineffective.
Ramkala Andors v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition after recording the valid delegation of powers under Section 33 of the Displaced Persons Act and the respondents' assurance to dispose of proceedings within four months.
Medhavi Krishna v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed admission of a PWD candidate to the Ph.D. programme, holding that post-interview cut-off marks imposed arbitrarily violated the Persons with Disabilities Act and principles of non-discrimination.
Manojaay Dabral v. Ravi Dabral
The Delhi High Court declined to interfere with a possession decree, granted stay of execution subject to status quo, and adjourned the matter for respondent's appearance and further consideration of appellant's request for time to vacate and waiver of mesne profits.
Avnija Ahluwalia (Minor) v. Bikramjit Ahluwalia & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that defendants may file delayed written statements despite dismissal of their Order VII Rule 11 application, subject to costs, as their right is not closed without a specific court order fixing time or closing that right.
M/S HCIL, ADHIKARYA ARSS (JV) v. RAIL VIKAS NIGAM LTD
The Delhi High Court held that the arbitral tribunal validly accepted the petitioner's challenge to the appointment of a government-employed arbitrator, terminating his mandate and requiring appointment of an independent arbitrator.
Ravinder Drama & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 328, 323, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties in a matrimonial dispute, emphasizing the court's power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and promote reconciliation.
M/S LOREAL v. COLLECTOR OF STAMPS / SDM-KALKAJI & ANR
The Delhi High Court held that the Collector of Stamps cannot adjudicate forgery claims while assessing stamp duty, and such issues must be decided in the pending civil suit, dismissing the writ petition as withdrawn.
R S GUPTA v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court set aside an order disposing of an appeal in the appellant's absence due to a road accident, restoring the appeal for fresh hearing to uphold natural justice.
TC SHARMA v. STATE OF NCT
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to purchase a new pistol without first selling the existing gun by depositing the old weapon with police or authorized dealer on the day of acquisition, ensuring continuous possession under threat perception.
Mukesh Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving charges under Sections 308, 323, and 34 IPC, emphasizing his cooperation with the investigation and the existence of a cross-FIR.
ADISHAKTI DIGITAL NETWORK AND ORS v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking extension for installing digital set-top boxes, directing completion of digital transition within two weeks as per government mandate.
M/S HCIL, ADHIKARYA ARSS (JV) v. RAIL VIKAS NIGAM LTD
The Delhi High Court held that the arbitral tribunal validly terminated the mandate of an arbitrator who was an executive of a party, requiring appointment of an independent arbitrator to ensure impartiality.
M/S LOREAL v. COLLECTOR OF STAMPS / SDM-KALKAJI & ANR
The Delhi High Court held that the Collector of Stamps can only assess stamp duty and cannot decide on the validity or forgery of a document, leaving such issues to be adjudicated in the pending civil suit.
R K Tarun v. Bhanu Praiasharma & Ors
The Delhi High Court closed a contempt petition challenging the takeover of University College of Medical Sciences, directing adherence to interim status quo orders and granting liberty to file afresh after modification or vacation of those orders.