Full Text
Translation output
t;. t $-47&48 HIGH COURT OF DELHI W,P.(CRL)3517/2016&Crl.M.A.19204/2016
SACHIN AGGARWAL Petitioner
Through; Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Adv. with petitioner in person.
SACHIN AGGARWAL Petitioner
Through; Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Adv. with petitioner in person.
VERSUS
THESTATE OF NCTOFDELHI&ORS. Respondents
Through: Ms. Nandita Rao, ASC and Ms. Srilina Roy, Adv. with SI Vijay
Kumar PS Farsh Bazar.
Mr. Puneet Goel, Adv. for R-2 with R-2in person.
Through: Ms. Nandita Rao, ASC and Ms. Srilina Roy, Adv. with SI Vijay
Kumar PS Farsh Bazar.
Mr. Puneet Goel, Adv. for R-2 with R-2in person.
AND
W.P.(CRL)3524/2016& Crl.M.A.19240/2016
GUNJAN CHAUDHARY Petitioner
Through: Mr.Puneet Goel,Adv. with petitioner in person.
GUNJAN CHAUDHARY Petitioner
Through: Mr.Puneet Goel,Adv. with petitioner in person.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI& ORS. Respondents
Through: Ms. Nandita Rao, ASC and Ms. Srilina Roy, Adv. with SI Vijay
Kumar PS Farsh Bazar.
Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Adv. for R-2 with R-2in person.
Through: Ms. Nandita Rao, ASC and Ms. Srilina Roy, Adv. with SI Vijay
Kumar PS Farsh Bazar.
Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Adv. for R-2 with R-2in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.K.PATHAK
15.12.2016 Petitioners have prayed for quashing ofthe following two cross FlRs.
(a)FIR No.355/2016 under Sections 323/354/506 IPC registered at police station Farsh Bazar on the complaintof
2016:DHC:9154 t;.
V
Ms.Gunjan Chauhdary.
(b)FIR No.356/2016 under Sections 323/341/506 IPG registered atpolice station Farzh Bazaron the complaintof
Mr.Sachin.
Complainantand accused are the advocates.Complainantand accused in both the aforesaid FIRs have settled their disputes amicably.
Complainants in both the FIRs are present in Court and have been identified by their respective counsels. They submit that they have settled the matter oftheir o\vn free will and without any undue force, pressure and coercion.
They further submit that they are not willing to pursue their respective FIRs anyfurther in view ofthe settlement.
Keeping in mind that a quarrel ensued between complainant and accused on some trivial matter and that they have now settled the disputes amicably,in the interest ofjustice, both the above referred FIRs,which are atthe investigation stage,are quashed.
Petitions are disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous applications are disposed ofas infructuous.
A.K.PATHAK,J.
DECEMBER 15,2016/dk 2016:DHC:9154
15.12.2016 Petitioners have prayed for quashing ofthe following two cross FlRs.
(a)FIR No.355/2016 under Sections 323/354/506 IPC registered at police station Farsh Bazar on the complaintof
2016:DHC:9154 t;.
V
Ms.Gunjan Chauhdary.
(b)FIR No.356/2016 under Sections 323/341/506 IPG registered atpolice station Farzh Bazaron the complaintof
Mr.Sachin.
Complainantand accused are the advocates.Complainantand accused in both the aforesaid FIRs have settled their disputes amicably.
Complainants in both the FIRs are present in Court and have been identified by their respective counsels. They submit that they have settled the matter oftheir o\vn free will and without any undue force, pressure and coercion.
They further submit that they are not willing to pursue their respective FIRs anyfurther in view ofthe settlement.
Keeping in mind that a quarrel ensued between complainant and accused on some trivial matter and that they have now settled the disputes amicably,in the interest ofjustice, both the above referred FIRs,which are atthe investigation stage,are quashed.
Petitions are disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous applications are disposed ofas infructuous.
A.K.PATHAK,J.
DECEMBER 15,2016/dk 2016:DHC:9154
JUDGMENT