Delhi High Court

67,253 judgments

Year:

Dhan Devi v. Laxmi Devi & Ors.

16 Dec 2016 · Pratibha Rani · 2016:DHC:8035

The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant's appeal, holding that without documentary proof of title, possession claims based on inheritance cannot be sustained, and recognized the appellant's possessory rights evidenced by a family arrangement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant title proof possession inheritance Hindu Succession Act

Farm Manufacturing Co. v. Delhi Development Authority

16 Dec 2016 · Vibhu BakhrU · 2016:DHC:8037

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award imposing misuse charges on leased property, holding that judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act is limited and the charges were correctly calculated as per applicable office orders.

civil petition_dismissed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 misuse charges lease deed

Subhadara v. Vijender Singh & Ors.

16 Dec 2016 · Ashutosh Kumar, J. · 2016:DHC:8045

The Delhi High Court held that civil courts lack jurisdiction over partition suits involving agricultural holdings under the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954, and dismissed the review petitions challenging such dismissal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 Section 185 Order VII Rule 11 CPC civil court jurisdiction

Santosh Kumari Chadha v. Railway Employees CGHS Ltd. & Anr

16 Dec 2016 · Sanjiv Khanna; Chander Shekhar · 2016:DHC:8046-DB

The Delhi High Court held that interest in an arbitration award must be simple unless specified, fixed the payable amount based on the General Body resolution, and directed possession of the flat to the petitioner's legal heirs upon payment.

civil petition_allowed Significant Cooperative Society Arbitration Award Interest - Simple vs Compound Flat Allotment

Gammon India Ltd. v. Delhi Development Authority

16 Dec 2016 · S. Muralidhar · 2016:DHC:8036

The Delhi High Court set aside parts of an arbitral Award for failing to provide reasons and lacking judicial approach, emphasizing the mandatory requirement of reasoned awards under the Arbitration Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 31(3) Section 34(2)(b)(ii) judicial approach

The Commissioner, Transport v. BSC-C&C JV

16 Dec 2016 · S. Muralidhar · 2016:DHC:8038

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding the petitioner responsible for project delays and denied judicial interference under the limited scope of Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Extension of Time Liquidated Damages

State (NCT of Delhi) v. Vinay Kumar

16 Dec 2016 · S. P. Garg · 2016:DHC:8040

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal seeking enhancement of sentence under the NDPS Act, upholding the Trial Court's lenient sentence considering mitigating factors and voluntary confession.

criminal appeal_dismissed NDPS Act Section 21(b) possession of narcotic drugs sentence enhancement

SHIRISH M.BARVE v. UNION OF INDIA

16 Dec 2016 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2016:DHC:8039

The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to consider and decide the petitioner’s pending Notary certificate renewal application by a reasoned order after allowing the petitioner to submit additional documents and be heard.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Notary certificate renewal reasoned order speaking order condonation of delay

RAMESH FAKIRRAO KUYATE v. UNION OF INDIA

16 Dec 2016 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2016:DHC:8041

The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to dispose of the petitioner’s pending Notary certificate renewal application by a reasoned order after allowing submission of additional documents and opportunity of hearing before denial.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Notary certificate renewal reasoned order condonation of delay opportunity of hearing

DAP BUILDCON PVT LTD v. B.B. LAL AGGARWAL

16 Dec 2016 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2016:DHC:8042

The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendant's leave to defend application in a summary suit, holding that a jurisdiction clause conferring jurisdiction on a court lacking jurisdiction is void and that the defendant's admission of liability entitled the plaintiff to a decree.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXXVII CPC leave to defend jurisdiction clause territorial jurisdiction

Patna Homeopathic Medical College & Hospital v. Union of India

16 Dec 2016 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2016:DHC:8029

The Delhi High Court held that while existing homeopathic colleges need not produce a State Government NOC, failure to provide mandatory facilities like dead bodies for dissection justifies denial of admission permission.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Homeopathy Central Council Act, 1973 No Objection Certificate Minimum Standards Requirements Regulations, 2013 admission permission

Union of India v. Shrey Bajaj and Anr.

16 Dec 2016 · Sanjiv Khanna; Chander Shekhar · 2016:DHC:8048-DB

The Delhi High Court held that failure to maintain a reserve panel or waiting list to fill vacancies arising from non-joining candidates is arbitrary, and qualified candidates must be considered for appointment from such lists.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant reserve panel waiting list staff selection commission appointment

Lalita Yadav v. State

16 Dec 2016 · Siddharth Mridul · 2016:DHC:9158

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging the denial of maintenance under section 125 CrPC, holding that the wife was employed, had sufficient means, and had willfully concealed material facts, thus disentitling her from maintenance.

family appeal_dismissed Significant maintenance section 125 CrPC family courts concealment of income

Rajiv Kumar v. Meena Sharma

16 Dec 2016 · Jayant Nath · 2016:DHC:9244

The Delhi High Court dismissed two petitions and all pending applications as withdrawn upon the petitioners' request for withdrawal.

other appeal_dismissed Procedural petition withdrawal dismissal as withdrawn High Court of Delhi procedural order

SWISSKEM HEALTHCARE v. THE DRUGS CONTROLLER GENERAL (INDIA)

16 Dec 2016 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2016:DHC:8875

The Delhi High Court formally included and disposed of several pharmaceutical companies' writ petitions by reference to an earlier common judgment, ensuring consistent and efficient adjudication.

administrative petition_allowed Procedural writ petitions Drugs Controller General of India judicial economy common judgment

Manglam Express Cargo Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India

16 Dec 2016 · Manmohan · 2016:DHC:8030

The Delhi High Court held that acceptance of tender bids after the prescribed validity period is ineffective, quashing termination orders and directing refund of earnest money.

civil appeal_allowed Significant tender validity period acceptance of offer Indian Contract Act 1872 Section 6(2)

Mohd. Yaseen v. State of Delhi

16 Dec 2016 · Mukta Gupta · 2016:DHC:8752

Bail was granted to accused in a murder case at an advanced trial stage where only formal witnesses remained and the sole circumstance against them was non-lodging of a missing report.

criminal bail_granted bail murder Section 302 IPC missing person report

Danny Singh @Denny v. State & Ors

15 Dec 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:9153
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR involving non-compoundable offences under IPC based on an amicable compromise between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR non-compoundable offences compromise

M/S ANS CONSTRUCTIONS LTD v. UNION OF INDIA

15 Dec 2016 · Vibhu Bakhrur · 2016:DHC:7999

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award rejecting claims based on a No Claim Certificate held valid despite allegations of coercion, emphasizing the binding nature of such certificates absent timely protest.

civil petition_dismissed Significant No Claim Certificate economic coercion financial duress accord and satisfaction

Anil Kumar Bakshi v. Satvir and Anr

15 Dec 2016 · S.P. Garg · 2016:DHC:8000

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's order treating a Section 138 NI Act case as a summons trial under Section 145(2), upholding the trial court's factual appreciation and discretion.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 482 Cr.P.C. Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 145(2) Negotiable Instruments Act summons trial