Delhi High Court
67,253 judgments
Kullu Valley Leisure Resorts Private Limited v. B R Bee Products Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the scheme of amalgamation between a wholly owned subsidiary and its holding company under the Companies Act, 1956, allowing dissolution of the transferor company without winding up.
Kalindee Rail Nirman (Engineers) Limited v. Texmaco Rail & Engineering Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the scheme of amalgamation between Kalindee Rail Nirman and Texmaco Rail & Engineering under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing dissolution of the amalgamating company without winding up.
Giesecke & Devrient India Private Limited v. Giesecke & Devrient MS India Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the proposed scheme of arrangement and demerger between two companies after ensuring statutory compliance and addressing regulatory concerns.
Yogita Godara v. Food Corporation of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld termination of a petitioner who obtained employment by submitting a false OBC certificate not from the Central List, holding that fraud vitiates equity and no estoppel applies against the State.
Shri Harish Chander v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking regularization of ad hoc service, holding that regularization requires sanctioned posts, vacancies, and adherence to regular recruitment procedures as per the Supreme Court’s Umadevi judgment.
Ajay Gautam v. PIO Delhi Waqf Board and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that an earlier CIC order on a different RTI application does not bar fresh adjudication of a distinct RTI appeal and remanded the matter for fresh decision.
Consolidated Finvest & Investments Limited v. Budhiya Marketing Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956, condoning procedural delays and addressing pending tax liabilities, resulting in the dissolution of transferor companies without winding up.
MODI-MUNDIPHARMA PVT. LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
The Delhi High Court held that a review petition against a pricing notification cannot be rejected solely on the ground of delay if a sufficient explanation is provided, and remitted the matter for reconsideration on merits with a personal hearing.
Samtech Informatics Private Limited v. Victoria Telecom Solutions Private Limited v. ASF Infrastructure Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a scheme of amalgamation between two transferor companies and a transferee company under the Companies Act, 1956, after considering all objections and reports, and imposed costs on the petitioners.
Vijay Sawhney v. Mrinalini Chopra
The Delhi High Court held that a consolidation order under the U.P. Consolidation Act overrides a civil court’s execution of a compromise decree for possession, dismissing the appeal to deliver possession from the University to receivers.
Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation) v. Compte Loyj
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeals, upholding the ITAT's ruling that payments to licensors did not constitute 'royalty' under the Income Tax Act and the Indo-Finland DTAA, following binding precedents.
Gulab Singh v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners accused under Sections 452, 506, 456, 427, and 34 IPC, relying on CCTV evidence and imposing conditions to maintain peace and ensure investigation cooperation.
Shikharaghav v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail applications of accused involved in cheating by collecting old currency notes post demonetization without depositing them as promised.
Store One Retail India Limited v. Annapurna Infrastructure Pvt Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award dismissing the challenge to lease termination and damages, affirming limited judicial review under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act and the validity requirements for termination notices.
SMS Paryavaran Ltd & Ors. v. Intergen Energy Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld framing of notice under Section 251 Cr.P.C. in cheque dishonour complaints, holding that defences cannot be adjudicated at the notice stage and the complaint prima facie disclosed the offence.
Madhava Hytech-Rani (JV) v. Ircon International Limited
The Delhi High Court held that the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 applies to the arbitration proceedings and disqualifies employees of a party from being arbitrators, allowing the petitioner’s request for appointment of an independent arbitrator despite dismissal of an earlier petition under the un-amended Act.
SMS Paryavaran Ltd & Ors. v. Intergen Energy Ltd
The High Court upheld the framing of notice under Section 251 Cr.P.C. in a Section 138 NI Act complaint, holding that detailed reasons are not mandatory at this stage and defences can be examined during trial.
SMS Paryavaran Ltd & Ors. v. Intergen Energy Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld framing of notice under Section 251 Cr.P.C. in a Section 138 NI Act complaint, holding that defence cannot be adjudicated at the notice stage and a prima facie case suffices.
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. v. Onil Kumar Gulati
The Delhi High Court upheld the compensation awarded to injured parties in a motor accident, dismissing insurer's challenge on negligence and rejecting enhancement of compensation sought by the injured driver.
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. v. Onil Kumar Gulati
The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals by the truck insurer and Innova driver, upholding the Tribunal's compensation awards and confirming insurer's liability due to absence of Section 170 application.