Full Text
Translation output
'
.+ HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date ofdecision:16^''December,2016.
W.P.tC)No.5442/2016 ..... Petitioner SWISSKEM HEALTHCAfe n ' n , :.
.+ HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date ofdecision:16^''December,2016.
W.P.tC)No.5442/2016 ..... Petitioner SWISSKEM HEALTHCAfe n ' n , :.
VERSUS
• ' ;
THEDRUGS CONTROLLER GENERAL(INDIA)
\ . - .....Respondents ' r ' -and " ^ > W.P.rC)No.5499/2016 i& ANR
M/S LEEFORD HEALTHCARE LIMITED , -' n ,
THEDRUGS CONTROLLER GENERAL(INDIA)
\ . - .....Respondents ' r ' -and " ^ > W.P.rC)No.5499/2016 i& ANR
M/S LEEFORD HEALTHCARE LIMITED , -' n ,
VERSUS
- n
UNION OFINDIA & ANR
\ ^ .AND ■-
W.P.(C)No.5510/2016 M/S ALLkiND HEALTHCARE UNIT HI
\
UNION OFINDIA & ANR
\ ^ .AND ■-
W.P.(C)No.5510/2016 M/S ALLkiND HEALTHCARE UNIT HI
\
VERSUS
. ' ' UNION OF INDIA AND ANR
: : ' AND_ , ■ ' '
W.P.(CyNo.5537/26l6 M/S ALLKIND HEALTHCARE
■ ■ ' ' - N-' .yersu?, ■ ' , -
UNION OFINDIA & ANR
■ '? v AND ■ '
W.P.rCl No.5589/2016 SKY HERBS INDIA versus. , , UNIONOFINblA^NDANR
^ ■; ■ ■ . ^ and
W.P.(CVNo.5590/20i6 SKY LAB..... Petitioner I..... Respondents ..... Petitioner
..Respondents Petitioner .Respondents ....; Petitioner ..... Respondents
Petitioner ^versus
: : ' AND_ , ■ ' '
W.P.(CyNo.5537/26l6 M/S ALLKIND HEALTHCARE
■ ■ ' ' - N-' .yersu?, ■ ' , -
UNION OFINDIA & ANR
■ '? v AND ■ '
W.P.rCl No.5589/2016 SKY HERBS INDIA versus. , , UNIONOFINblA^NDANR
^ ■; ■ ■ . ^ and
W.P.(CVNo.5590/20i6 SKY LAB..... Petitioner I..... Respondents ..... Petitioner
..Respondents Petitioner .Respondents ....; Petitioner ..... Respondents
Petitioner ^versus
W.P.(C) NO.S442/2016, W.P.(C)No.5499/2016, W.P.(C) NoiSS10/2016, W.P.(C) Nd.5537/2016, W.p.(C)
Nb.5589/2016,W.P.(C)No.5590/2016 ^ . - ' , , , ' Page1of2
2016:DHC:8875 ai
;• a::/.n nn n : ;n ■>■ :
..i/;Respondents Counsels for the petitioners;- s ^
: Mr. Anirudh Garg andMs.'Meenakshi Gupta, Advs. . '
- Mr. Counsels for the respondents;- .^Mf.Ru
'_G0RAM:\- ;■ ' V
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAIENDLAW d. , Though these petitions were lalso to he, disposed of in terms of
.
Nb.5589/2016,W.P.(C)No.5590/2016 ^ . - ' , , , ' Page1of2
2016:DHC:8875 ai
;• a::/.n nn n : ;n ■>■ :
..i/;Respondents Counsels for the petitioners;- s ^
: Mr. Anirudh Garg andMs.'Meenakshi Gupta, Advs. . '
- Mr. Counsels for the respondents;- .^Mf.Ru
'_G0RAM:\- ;■ ' V
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAIENDLAW d. , Though these petitions were lalso to he, disposed of in terms of
.
JUDGMENT
dated f^Deceniber-2016 in'W.P.;(CjNo.22l'2/2016,t^^^^^^
Limited & Anr. Vs. Union ofIndia & Anr. and 453 other petitions as per
Schedule thereto but,remained to be mentioned in the Schedule to the said
. , judgment dated l^^December^^^^ , ^ . : , ' ; ,
Limited & Anr. Vs. Union ofIndia & Anr. and 453 other petitions as per
Schedule thereto but,remained to be mentioned in the Schedule to the said
. , judgment dated l^^December^^^^ , ^ . : , ' ; ,
2. ■ The Assistant Court Master,Mr. Naveen Kumar has brought.this to. mynotice today. ' '.,, 3,. " For judgment in these petitions also,,see W.P.(C)No.22i2/2016 titled; PfizsrLimited^Anr. Vs. Union ofIndia & Anr.
DECEMBER 16,2016;PP ••, / RAJIV SAHAIENDLAW,J W.P.(C) No.5442/20r[6], W-P- No.5589/2016, W,P.(C) No.5S90/2016 >,W.P.(C) ■ '.*■ '. Page 2.of[2]