Delhi High Court

59,406 judgments

Year:

Central Secretariat Club v. Geetam Singh

02 Nov 2017 · C. Hari Shankar · 2017:DHC:6568

Central Secretariat Club v. Geetam Singh

02 Nov 2017 · C. Hari Shankar · 2017:DHC:6571

D.T.C v. Chander Singh

02 Nov 2017 · C. Hari Shankar · 2017:DHC:6572

Wasim Akram Malik v. National Investigation Agency

02 Nov 2017 · Vipin Sanghi; P. S. Teji · 2017:DHC:6573-DB

Jamna Dass & Ors. v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

02 Nov 2017 · G.S. Sistani; V. Kameswar Rao · 2017:DHC:6606-DB

Azad @ Anand Singh & Ors. v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

02 Nov 2017 · S. Ravindra Bhat; S.P. Garg · 2017:DHC:6574-DB

Kent RO Systems Ltd & Anr. v. Mr Jiten Aggarwal & Ors.

02 Nov 2017 · Manmohan · 2017:DHC:6570

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction against defendants for infringing plaintiffs' registered designs and trademarks in water purifiers, relying on verified pleadings and binding undertakings without requiring ex parte evidence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant permanent injunction design infringement trademark infringement passing off

Dilip Kumar v. State

02 Nov 2017 · Pratibha Rani · 2017:DHC:6567

The Delhi High Court set aside the appellant’s conviction under Section 6 of POCSO Act due to procedural lapses but upheld his conviction under Section 376 IPC for rape obtained by fraud, emphasizing mandatory compliance with Section 217 CrPC and invalidity of consent given under misconception of fact.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant charge amendment Section 217 CrPC POCSO Act consent under misconception

Saregama India Limited v. The Indian Singers Rights Association

02 Nov 2017 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2017:DHC:6569-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a court must judicially satisfy itself of the lawfulness of a compromise under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC before recording it and passing a decree, and set aside a decree based on a settlement not so examined.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC compromise lawful settlement Order I Rule 10 CPC

Madhusmita Bora v. Rahul Bhatnagar & Ors.

02 Nov 2017 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2017:DHC:6605

The Delhi High Court set aside the grant of leave to defend in a suit under Order XXXVII CPC for recovery of professional fees from dishonoured cheques, holding the defence to be mala fide and awarding summary decree with interest to the Advocate.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXXVII CPC leave to defend dishonoured cheque professional fees

S.K. Sharma v. B.L. Verma & Anr.

02 Nov 2017 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2017:DHC:6604

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the closure of the plaintiff’s right to cross-examine a defendant witness in a long-pending suit for specific performance, emphasizing the need for expeditious disposal and adherence to trial procedure.

civil petition_dismissed Article 227 Constitution of India specific performance cross-examination closure of evidence

VIRKARAN AWASTY v. State of NCT of Delhi

01 Nov 2017 · Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2017:DHC:6540

Purhpa Sud v. The Govt. of NCT

01 Nov 2017 · G. S. Sistani; V. Kameswar Rao · 2017:DHC:6541-DB

S.K. Bhattacharya (Retd.) v. Union of India

01 Nov 2017 · Hima Kohli; Rekha Palli · 2017:DHC:6556-DB

AAXIS NANO TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR

01 Nov 2017 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; SANJEEV SACHDEVA · 2017:DHC:6532-DB

The Delhi High Court held that cancellation of a tender acceptance without affording the successful bidder an opportunity of hearing violates natural justice and is liable to be quashed.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant tender cancellation letter of acceptance natural justice show-cause notice