Delhi High Court
59,406 judgments
M/S. L’OREAL v. SHRI YOGESH JETHI & ANOTHER
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to L’OREAL against defendants for trademark infringement, passing off, and copyright violation involving the ‘L’OREAL’ mark.
Vivek Srivastava v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed adverse ACR remarks tainted by reasonable likelihood of bias and directed a fresh review DPC for promotion of the petitioner.
Jagdish Lohra v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the disciplinary inquiry findings and penalty against a CISF officer, holding that the inquiry complied with natural justice and the findings were supported by evidence.
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. E. John & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal, holding that the tribunal rightly proceeded ex-parte and allowed evidence after the insurer failed to appear despite due notice in a motor accident claim under the Motor Vehicles Act.
Abhay Kumar v. Balbir Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the quantum of compensation awarded in a motor accident claim due to inadequate disability assessment and remanded the matter for fresh evaluation by a medical board including orthopedic and eye specialists.
Sheela & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the claimants' appeal seeking enhanced compensation and upheld the tribunal's finding of contributory negligence and apportionment of liability in a fatal accident at an unmanned railway crossing.
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Mahesh Kumar
The Delhi High Court modified compensation awarded for motor accident injuries by adjusting disability assessment, multiplier for prospective loss of income, and interest rate, emphasizing proper calculation based on medical evidence and future prospects.
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Mahesh Kumar
The Delhi High Court modified the compensation awarded in a motor accident claim by adjusting disability assessment, recalculating prospective loss of income with a reduced multiplier, enhancing leave salary compensation, and increasing interest to 9% per annum.
Savitri Sharma v. Asha Rani & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the grant of leave to defend in an eviction petition, ruling that the limitation period for filing leave to defend is computed from the first service of summons, but filings made under earlier law cannot be deemed delayed.
Rajni Bedi v. Desh Raj Chopra and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that general power of attorney and agreement to sell do not confer title and that a suit for recovery of possession is not barred by limitation even if the ancillary relief of declaration regarding such documents is time-barred.
HSIL LTD. v. MARVEL CERAMICS & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that a suit under the Trade Marks Act must be filed where the cause of action arose or the plaintiff's principal place of business is located, dismissing the appeal for lack of territorial jurisdiction in Delhi.
S. Amolak Singh v. Narender Kumar Dang
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of a tenant under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, holding that the landlord's bona fide requirement and better title justify eviction despite tenant's vague defenses and alleged alternate accommodation.
National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Jang Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the insurer's appeal granting it recovery rights against the owner and driver for compensation paid where the driver lacked a valid license, independent of criminal conviction.
M/S DIGICALL GLOBAL PVT LTD v. BLS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES LTD
The Delhi High Court referred the dispute between M/s Digicall Global Pvt Ltd and BLS International Services Ltd to arbitration, stayed the suit and counter-claim, and ordered refund of court fees under the Court Fees Act.
Shalinitaickar v. Rajeev Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that any transfer of suit properties during pending suits is subject to the doctrine of lis pendens under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and directed defendants to inform plaintiffs of such transfers, without deciding the merits.
Saregama India Limited v. The Indian Singers Rights Association & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of three commercial appeals involving Saregama India Limited and the Indian Singers Rights Association on 2nd November 2017, referring to a detailed judgment in one of the appeals.
Mohandas v. National Highways Authority of India
The Delhi High Court upheld NHAI’s rejection of the petitioner’s bids for failing to meet eligibility criteria, emphasizing judicial restraint in tender evaluations absent arbitrariness or mala fide.
Saregama India Limited v. The Indian Singers Rights Association & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of appeals filed by Saregama India Limited against the Indian Singers Rights Association on 2nd November 2017, referring to the detailed judgment in RFA(OS)(COMM) 16/2017.
Ram Kumar Goyal & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court transferred the writ petition to the Supreme Court following the Supreme Court's directive to consolidate similar cases before it.
Roopchand & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act if compensation is not paid to recorded owners despite possession, entitling petitioners to compensation under the new law.