Delhi High Court
31,024 judgments
Rajesh Gadiya v. The Additional Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court upheld penalties for smuggling under the Customs Act, ruling that denial of cross-examination was justified and directing the Petitioners to file appeals with pre-deposit within a limited time.
Ankit Saxena v. Roopvilla Co-operative Group Housing Society Ltd
The Delhi High Court directed the Registrar Cooperative Societies to expeditiously decide the petitioner's expulsion under Section 86 of the DCS Act, holding that the power of review is limited and expulsion must be based on proven illegal acts.
Dr. Shingini Sharma v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal and disposed of the petition accordingly.
Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors. v. Ram Pal Solanki
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order treating the appointment of a Group-D employee to Driver as direct recruitment, entitling him to Third Financial Upgradation under MACP.
Charan Dass & Ors. v. Mukesh Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the executability of a possession decree despite the objectors claiming possession of a slightly lesser area, dismissing their objection petition under Order XXI Rule 58 CPC.
Mohd. Yasir v. State GNCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 308 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, affirming the court's power under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita to end criminal proceedings in the interest of justice.
Nitin Kumar Sharma v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a real estate fraud case on parity with co-accused, emphasizing procedural fairness and settlement of claims.
Jitender Kumar Vickey v. The State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted a limited ten-day extension of furlough on medical grounds to a prisoner but declined a longer extension due to lack of medical necessity for further rest outside jail.
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Sudesh @ Swadesh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court ordered release of 50% of the awarded compensation to the claimant in a motor accident case, affirming that unchallenged evidence of rash driving supported by criminal records entitles the claimant to just and fair compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.
M/S ASICS CORPORATION v. VEEKESY FOOTGEAR PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR
The Delhi High Court dismissed the commercial appeal as withdrawn on the appellant's request without expressing any opinion on the merits.
VERSUS
The Delhi High Court quashed FIRs and chargesheets against Tablighi Jamaat members for alleged COVID-19 lockdown violations, holding no prima facie case under Sections 188, 269, 270 IPC and related health laws was made out.
Sharad Vaid and Anr. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, holding that continuing criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Harish Chander and Anr. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 420, 468, 471, 120B, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, applying the principle that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process of law.
Ashutosh and Others v. State of N.C.T. of Delhi and Others
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between parties, reaffirming the court's power to end criminal cases in the interest of justice under Article 226 and Section 528 BNS.
Union of India and Ors. v. Ex Sub Rajender Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are attributable to military service unless rebutted.
Chandrika Prasad v. Docbel Industries
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a Labour Court Award for non-prosecution after the petitioner settled the dispute and expressed intent to withdraw the petition.
Harihar Prasad v. Docbel Industries
The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Labour Court Award for non-prosecution after the petitioner settled the dispute and expressed his intention to withdraw the petition.
Nirmal Gupta v. Ram Niwas Gupta
The Delhi High Court held that revision petitions against interlocutory orders of Commercial Courts are barred under Section 8 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and Article 227 jurisdiction is to be exercised sparingly to uphold legislative intent.
Alpro Industries and Anr v. Indo Alusis Industries Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that revision under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable against interlocutory orders that do not finally dispose of the suit, dismissing the petition challenging the rejection of additional documents.
Susheel Saxena v. M/S I.C. Technologies Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that revision under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable against interim orders that do not finally dispose of the suit, dismissing the petition accordingly.